Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Edutaining Games - Effective/Ineffective?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Goku,

Try [url=http://www.mediafire.com/file/yzcimmonkzm/100 Games - Teaching English to Children in Asia.pdf] these games[/url] or even better, go HERE and find all the articles, activities, theory and description about games you'll need.


By the way, games work because language is something intimately connected to "will". When we use language to accomplish a task, to transfer meaning, to "get something", to communicate and send thought from A to B -- we are harnessing a powerful learning principle. Games have that embeded within. The key is to make them fully particpatory and involving -- the HOW. Use creative point awarding (a bag of photo copied money works wonders or a spinner) and make an aspect of suspence inherent (like in my BAAM game which does this in a simple but powerful fashion). Further, have the game focus on some kind of target language - contextualized learning - a theme or a grammatical feature. You don't need to pay anyone $$$ to learn about this.

It's all in the eating, not just the cooking.

DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com
DD
http://eflclassroom.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
QbertP



Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also I would consider your purpose in the classroom. Many teachers, especially in public school positions, may only see a given class for 45 minutes a week.

In the face of the rest of their time spent in school or in hagwon this is a pathetically small chance to make any sort of impression.

As Ddeubel said language is connected to the "will". Fostering some sort of intrinsic desire to learn English is IMO far more important than what language points you are actually teaching.
That said there is a difference between having fun in English class, and having English class as simply fun time. Appropriate games and activities introduce language and facilitate learning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmbfan



Joined: 09 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

See this is the ongoing problem in Korea (and in other places), concerning the idea of what learning English should or should not be.

First, Koreans have no clue on the matter so their opinions are pretty much useless. As I have said before, I have yet to meet one Korean who can.....
1. Speak English in the classroom.
2. Generate English conversation using methods/material that is not in the
book.
3. Prepare, deliver and engage a solid ESL lesson.


Anyway, I'm not a teaching genius but let me present a point. Learning ANY foreign language is like learning to play a musical instraument.

1. You have to know what you are reading.
2. You have to know what you are hearing.
3. You have to know how to process the information in your brain.
4. You have to know how to use your instraument and communicate the
information back to the sender.
5. You have to practice.


Inspiration, yes....it is important. But, I think back when I was learning Spanish in school and I recall that we were there to work...not to play bingo everyday. We worked, practiced, did our homework and went on about our day.

Here and in many places in Asia, the responsibility of the student and the parent(s) does not seem to matter...in addition to the responsibility to hire good instructors (especially in Korea.........speaking mainly towards the Korean "teachers"). The idea of "edutainment" does have it's place. But, it cannot be an everyday matter.

Perhaps Korea will one day realize that it spends so much on English education as a country, but yet has some of the lowest results.

Learning takes work. It takes responsibiliy.


Teaching takes preparation, dedication and discipline. Dedication does NOT mean playing the role of a parent, especially in ESL. It is not our job. Our job is to teach them English, have a little fun and get as much as we can out of them. It is not our job to be their friends, bribe them with candy and lavish them with attention (Korean teachers). We should them accountable as we hold ourselves accountable..........and in Korea, holding students accountable WILL put an instructor in a trick situation with the boss and Korean "teachers".

Here in Korea, motivation should come from the fact that these kids' parents are spending their money for their prince/princes to learn English. If I were a parent, I would make dam well sure my kids was practicing what he/she what was taught. It has to be realized that these kids are not here to be entertained by you or me. The Koreans can do what ever they want to do. At the end of the day, it is us who spend our time in the ESL trenches. I don't care how much admin work the Koreans do....not my problem. Until they can....

1. Set an example by speaking to the kids in English (40-50 minute classes....that's it).
2. Prepare a decent lesson that gets the kids speaking English.
3. Can come up with something (lesson) original, creative and not taken from another foreign teacher (without thanks)..
4. Can realize that it is not how many pages you do in the book that counts.......
5. Work for a boss that expects the same things as we do.

...until that time, they can't tell me (our most of you) anything about ESL, teaching or what it should be. Yes, they know a lot about the rules of grammar but they still can't comminucate. I've spent so much time with kids, breaking bad habits they learned from their Korean teachers, picking up the slack from other waygooks who go by the theory...

"Oh, these poor kids. This is the only time they can have fun. I need to make them smile. I NEED to make them laugh. I can't hold them accountable. It is not their fault.

Translation: Laziness


Education first.
Entertainment second.


dmbfan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Goku



Joined: 10 Dec 2008

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmbfan wrote:
See this is the ongoing problem in Korea (and in other places), concerning the idea of what learning English should or should not be.

First, Koreans have no clue on the matter so their opinions are pretty much useless. As I have said before, I have yet to meet one Korean who can.....
1. Speak English in the classroom.
2. Generate English conversation using methods/material that is not in the
book.
3. Prepare, deliver and engage a solid ESL lesson.


Anyway, I'm not a teaching genius but let me present a point. Learning ANY foreign language is like learning to play a musical instraument.

1. You have to know what you are reading.
2. You have to know what you are hearing.
3. You have to know how to process the information in your brain.
4. You have to know how to use your instraument and communicate the
information back to the sender.
5. You have to practice.


Inspiration, yes....it is important. But, I think back when I was learning Spanish in school and I recall that we were there to work...not to play bingo everyday. We worked, practiced, did our homework and went on about our day.

Here and in many places in Asia, the responsibility of the student and the parent(s) does not seem to matter...in addition to the responsibility to hire good instructors (especially in Korea.........speaking mainly towards the Korean "teachers"). The idea of "edutainment" does have it's place. But, it cannot be an everyday matter.

Perhaps Korea will one day realize that it spends so much on English education as a country, but yet has some of the lowest results.

Learning takes work. It takes responsibiliy.


Teaching takes preparation, dedication and discipline. Dedication does NOT mean playing the role of a parent, especially in ESL. It is not our job. Our job is to teach them English, have a little fun and get as much as we can out of them. It is not our job to be their friends, bribe them with candy and lavish them with attention (Korean teachers). We should them accountable as we hold ourselves accountable..........and in Korea, holding students accountable WILL put an instructor in a trick situation with the boss and Korean "teachers".

Here in Korea, motivation should come from the fact that these kids' parents are spending their money for their prince/princes to learn English. If I were a parent, I would make dam well sure my kids was practicing what he/she what was taught. It has to be realized that these kids are not here to be entertained by you or me. The Koreans can do what ever they want to do. At the end of the day, it is us who spend our time in the ESL trenches. I don't care how much admin work the Koreans do....not my problem. Until they can....

1. Set an example by speaking to the kids in English (40-50 minute classes....that's it).
2. Prepare a decent lesson that gets the kids speaking English.
3. Can come up with something (lesson) original, creative and not taken from another foreign teacher (without thanks)..
4. Can realize that it is not how many pages you do in the book that counts.......
5. Work for a boss that expects the same things as we do.

...until that time, they can't tell me (our most of you) anything about ESL, teaching or what it should be. Yes, they know a lot about the rules of grammar but they still can't comminucate. I've spent so much time with kids, breaking bad habits they learned from their Korean teachers, picking up the slack from other waygooks who go by the theory...

"Oh, these poor kids. This is the only time they can have fun. I need to make them smile. I NEED to make them laugh. I can't hold them accountable. It is not their fault.

Translation: Laziness


Education first.
Entertainment second.


dmbfan


That's exactly how I feel at this point of my ESL teaching.
Especially about the part of thinking back to my Spanish days...

We did play games but far and few between and I was trying to remember if I actually learned anything from them... I didn't... In fact, I can't even remember what the point of the game was. All I remember was that it was fun.

Whereas I recall the hardest part about spanish because I took a long time grapsing the concept. Subjunctive form. I drilled it hard into and it was boring as hell, but I understood it and it stayed with me. And I took pleasure in learning it and being able to apply it later.

But I have to consider the fact that I only learned these things because of my learning style.

I'm thinking games can be educational if done effectively and properly, but I'm observing my students more and more and I get the feeling (only feeling) it would be much more productive to be teaching them more solid lessons like phrases, some applicable grammar, or new vocabulary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmbfan



Joined: 09 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote]That's exactly how I feel at this point of my ESL teaching.
Especially about the part of thinking back to my Spanish days...

We did play games but far and few between and I was trying to remember if I actually learned anything from them... I didn't... In fact, I can't even remember what the point of the game was. All I remember was that it was fun.

Whereas I recall the hardest part about spanish because I took a long time grapsing the concept. Subjunctive form. I drilled it hard into and it was boring as hell, but I understood it and it stayed with me. And I took pleasure in learning it and being able to apply it later.

But I have to consider the fact that I only learned these things because of my learning style.

I'm thinking games can be educational if done effectively and properly, but I'm observing my students more and more and I get the feeling (only feeling) it would be much more productive to be teaching them more solid lessons like phrases, some applicable grammar, or new vocabulary.[/quote]


Good thoughts. Unfortunately, the only proven method that works is total immersion. However, what you described sounds somewhat like the Communicative/Lexical approach. I am a fan of that and I think it compliments my teaching style.

As for the kids, well..........................as in music, basics are very imporant. Most of my students can't sound out words because they can't read properly. They have not been taught, yet they are in classes that are beyond their level.

There are so many more important things kids have to learn BEFORE , for example.........You---have....vs.....She----has.

Months of the year.
Days of the week (Today is, Tomorrow will be, Yesterday was).
Time of day
Phonics
ordinal numbers
Site Words

If I had my way, we would spend about two solid weeks on the basics. Practice, writing, speaking and tests.

Here, I am desperately trying to give more visual aids at the start of class, using prepositions and articles (Bogglesworldesl.com is great for flashcards). Once they can gain a mental image, it is easier for them to make that connection with what to say and what it means.

Really, I had a upper level class that could not even respond to..........
"Jimmy, how are you today?".

or

"Hello, Jimmy".

Nothing but blank stares.


And you know what, I put a lot of blame on the korean "teachers".

It is all smoke and mirros and the parents are dumb enough to buy into it.


Education, first.
Entertainment, second.

dmbfan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cubanlord



Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Location: In Japan!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ddeubel wrote:
You don't need to pay anyone $$$ to learn about this.


You know, DD is right in that you don't have to pay anyone money to learn about these things. There is a wealth of information on the Internet that is readily available for free. My book doesn't discuss theory or the reasoning behind research. On the contrary, it provides teachers with proven to be effective listening lesson plans, much like the lesson plans on DD's site. The only difference is that I want to be compensated for my time and creativity with certain things ( http://www.teachingenglishmadeeasy.com ), but not all things (as demonstrated in my other site http://www.ralphsesljunction.com ); DD wants to give everything for free (or wants you to donate some money). Yet, DD has some extreme convictions regarding what I am doing.

What I don't understand is why DD, every chance he gets, hops on right behind me and tells people they don't have to buy my book, whether indirectly or directly. Then, he inevitably makes a reference to his website.

I don't mean to hijack your thread OP, so I will make this short. DD, why are you so against people's interest in my book? You have a wonderful site and offer a lot of free content. What is wrong with entrepreneurship? You briefly stated that you didn't like education being a commodity, but following me around on Dave's and saying people shouldn't buy my book and then turning around and advertising your site in your signature is a bit hypocritical don't you think? I know you aren't "selling" your site, per se. But why have such animosity towards me and my book?

I just don't understand what I did to you and why you feel it necessary to always tell people on this board that they shouldn't use my book?

P.S. People have been buying my book and they are content with their purchases. Just check out the testimonials. There must be something in my books that people are enjoying.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cubanlord



Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Location: In Japan!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Edutaining Games - Effective/Ineffective? Reply with quote

Goku wrote:
cubanlord wrote:
Goku wrote:
cubanlord wrote:


Game are quite effective in language learning. I've written about games and their effectiveness; I've also researched it. I even have one or two in my new book that was recently published. They work for a variety of reasons, all of which I won't discuss here because it'll take to long. Just make sure that the learning component is strong in the game and it just isn't a game. It'll increase what students will learn, especially if you are reiterating what they already know.


Thanks Cubanlord and posters.

If possible,
Do you have an electronic copy of your article?

I'm looking for more hard evidence of effectiveness beyond just theory of language learning.


Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed

I do, but, they are in the new book that I wrote which is found on my site. www.teachingenglishmadeeasy.com

If I just give it to you, then I am basically just giving away my book. Crying or Very sad Please forgive me.


Ah I totally understand,

I saw this book before, Buy/Trade/Sell forum

I might be interested in buying.


Goku,

Check out this link and look at what is in the book. http://www.teachingenglishmadeeasy.com/excerpts.html It'll give you an idea of what you would be purchasing. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Thanks again for understanding.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Otherside



Joined: 06 Sep 2007

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cubanlord wrote:


P.S. People have been buying my book and they are content with their purchases. Just check out the testimonials. There must be something in my books that people are enjoying.


I couldn't find the testimonials on your site, but I did find the comments.

Quote:
"It's so useful! Thank you!"

(A. Winchester - Korea)


Isn't she your wife^^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cubanlord



Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Location: In Japan!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Otherside wrote:
cubanlord wrote:


P.S. People have been buying my book and they are content with their purchases. Just check out the testimonials. There must be something in my books that people are enjoying.


I couldn't find the testimonials on your site, but I did find the comments.

Quote:
"It's so useful! Thank you!"

(A. Winchester - Korea)


Isn't she your wife^^


lol. Laughing Laughing Laughing Ironically, I was just updating the site with the recent purchases. Please check again.

http://www.teachingenglishmadeeasy.com/testimonials.html

The whole site was just updated a few second ago.

I will update the testimonials as I get permission (and quotes) from the other customers that have purchased the book.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cubanlord moaned

Quote:
I just don't understand what I did to you and why you feel it necessary to always tell people on this board that they shouldn't use my book?


I think you answered that question right off.

Quote:
ddeubel wrote:
You don't need to pay anyone $$$ to learn about this.

Cubanlord replied,

You know, DD is right in that you don't have to pay anyone money to learn about these things.


But I'll elaborate just to make sure it's clear.

A) I never said anything about "don't buy the book". I buy more than the average person. All paid for out of my own pocket. What I did say was you don't have to pay for knowledge. Your last post made it seem like teaching is some big secret and only you know it and teachers better pay money or they are missing out on something. To that kind of spirit - I say take the sideshow somewhere else. This isn't about snake oil and miraculous cures.

I think there are far too many places/people preying on new teachers, quite desperate for knowledge/know how. Consider me, the fifth estate. Both you and I make a great living out of education. In return, we shouldn't cannibalize our own vocation. We should pay it back, for our own society and that of a future that is a little brighter than the one we now look out upon.

There you have it. If you consider that position extreme, than you shouldn't be in education.

DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cubanlord



Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Location: In Japan!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ddeubel wrote:
Cubanlord moaned

Quote:
I just don't understand what I did to you and why you feel it necessary to always tell people on this board that they shouldn't use my book?


I think you answered that question right off.

Quote:
ddeubel wrote:
You don't need to pay anyone $$$ to learn about this.

Cubanlord replied,

You know, DD is right in that you don't have to pay anyone money to learn about these things.


But I'll elaborate just to make sure it's clear.

A) I never said anything about "don't buy the book". I buy more than the average person. All paid for out of my own pocket. What I did say was you don't have to pay for knowledge. Your last post made it seem like teaching is some big secret and only you know it and teachers better pay money or they are missing out on something. To that kind of spirit - I say take the sideshow somewhere else. This isn't about snake oil and miraculous cures.

I think there are far too many places/people preying on new teachers, quite desperate for knowledge/know how. Consider me, the fifth estate. Both you and I make a great living out of education. In return, we shouldn't cannibalize our own vocation. We should pay it back, for our own society and that of a future that is a little brighter than the one we now look out upon.

There you have it. If you consider that position extreme, than you shouldn't be in education.

DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com


Wow DD,

Cubanlord moaned? What was that? I guess you can call it a moan and no, my book is definitely not the end all of ESL/EFL teaching. It's just a little extra for one to add to his or her teaching repertoire. Are you still going to follow me around to EVERY thread I post that has a mention of my book and advertise your own stuff? Question

Quote:
If you consider that position extreme, than you shouldn't be in education.


Well DD, I am not "preying" on teachers. I am only providing a product to them that may help them. They always have a choice. Furthermore, I wouldn't dare be presumptuous and tell people that if you don't believe what I believe, then something is wrong with you. I do respect others' opinions regardless of the issue. I'm sorry we don't see things the same way.


Last edited by cubanlord on Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Games are useful and important, but any KT who tells their co-teacher 'you should only play games' likely has his/her head up their ass. In Korea they're too commonly used for the simple reason that Korean students don't want to try to pay attention to English or have been subconciously programmed not to.

The right kind of game can be great for repetition. This week one of my consistantly worst students (and we're talking over a period of more than two years) blurted out 'Please change the head!' when it was her team's turn after hearing the similar structure about 20 times from classmates during the game we were playing. I'm willing to bet it's the first grammatical English sentence she's ever uttered in her entire life that wasn't direct repetition. While I'm still quite confident that she'll score about 20% on the English component of her CSAT, perhaps one day she'll find herself in a position to make a request to a foreigner and actually be comprehensible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ddeubel wrote:
Cubanlord moaned

Quote:
I just don't understand what I did to you and why you feel it necessary to always tell people on this board that they shouldn't use my book?


I think you answered that question right off.

Quote:
ddeubel wrote:
You don't need to pay anyone $$$ to learn about this.

Cubanlord replied,

You know, DD is right in that you don't have to pay anyone money to learn about these things.


But I'll elaborate just to make sure it's clear.

A) I never said anything about "don't buy the book". I buy more than the average person. All paid for out of my own pocket. What I did say was you don't have to pay for knowledge. Your last post made it seem like teaching is some big secret and only you know it and teachers better pay money or they are missing out on something. To that kind of spirit - I say take the sideshow somewhere else. This isn't about snake oil and miraculous cures.

I think there are far too many places/people preying on new teachers, quite desperate for knowledge/know how. Consider me, the fifth estate. Both you and I make a great living out of education. In return, we shouldn't cannibalize our own vocation. We should pay it back, for our own society and that of a future that is a little brighter than the one we now look out upon.

There you have it. If you consider that position extreme, than you shouldn't be in education.

DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com


Harsh but true. However, I think that sentiment would be even better directed at the Korean teachers whose only interest in professional development is getting into the lucrative textbook publishing industry more so than a hogwon supervisor nickle-and-diming it with a self-publication.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yu_Bum_suk wrote:
Games are useful and important, but any KT who tells their co-teacher 'you should only play games' likely has his/her head up their ass. In Korea they're too commonly used for the simple reason that Korean students don't want to try to pay attention to English or have been subconciously programmed not to.

The right kind of game can be great for repetition. This week one of my consistantly worst students (and we're talking over a period of more than two years) blurted out 'Please change the head!' when it was her team's turn after hearing the similar structure about 20 times from classmates during the game we were playing. I'm willing to bet it's the first grammatical English sentence she's ever uttered in her entire life that wasn't direct repetition. While I'm still quite confident that she'll score about 20% on the English component of her CSAT, perhaps one day she'll find herself in a position to make a request to a foreigner and actually be comprehensible.



The "game" I used this week is basically a practice sentence-forming/ reading/pronunciation exercise for them....it's just disguised as a game so that they think it's fun.

I had students who were too shy to utter a word suddenly blurt out grammatically correct sentences, because guess what? It was part of the GAME!!! They were having fun doing it, and I didn't have to beat anyone over the head to get them to try either. (not that I ever would do such a thing, just being figurative)

As for my co-teacher's request... I think she is overworked and wants to slip out of my classes all the time. She recognizes (correctly I think) that I will have a lot fewer discipline problems if I am doing games, so it's easier for her to leave me on my own. Rightly or wrongly, that's the situation I'm in. It's what I was asked to do.

In a perfect world, I know I would change things, but I'm not in a perfect world. I just do the best I can with what I've got.

Sorry, I wasn't directing this entire post to you YBS, more to previous posters. I was trying to explain my reasoning and comment about my co-teacher all in the same post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cubanlord



Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Location: In Japan!

PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 1:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

some waygug-in wrote:
The "game" I used this week is basically a practice sentence-forming/ reading/pronunciation exercise for them....it's just disguised as a game so that they think it's fun.


and in my humble opinion, that is the key - to disguise the games as just that, games. The students won't even know that they are learning language!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International