|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:59 pm Post subject: Interesting read on adolescent oppositional defiant disorder |
|
|
http://www.aacap.org/cs/root/publication_store/your_adolescent_oppositional_defiant_disorder
I'm always hesitant to rush towards trying to identify and diagnose 'disorders' in specific kids, but this article does provide a lot of good background explanation about certain behavioural trends, even if it's very much lacking in practical suggestions.
I think that especially useful to consider from our perspective is:
Quote: |
Social Skills Training When coupled with other therapies, social skills training has been effective in helping teens alter their dif�ficult social behaviors that result from their angry and defiant approach to rules. Social skills training incorporates reinforcement strategies and rewards for appropriate behavior to help a teenager learn to generalize posi�tive behavior, that is, apply one set of social rules to other situations. Thus, following the rules of a game may be generalized to rules of the classroom; working together on a team may generalize to working with adults rather than against them. Through such training, adolescents can learn to evaluate social situa�tions and adjust their behavior accordingly. The most successful therapies are those that provide training in the teen's natural environments‑such as in the classroom or in social groups as this may help them apply what they learned directly to their lives.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChinaBoy
Joined: 17 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
These people have obviously no clue how to deal with kids. They would be laughed at. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChinaBoy wrote: |
These people have obviously no clue how to deal with kids. They would be laughed at. |
By whom and why?
Consider the following commonly agreed upon symptoms of ODD:
Quote: |
A pattern of negativistic, hostile, and defiant behavior lasting at least 6 months, during which four (or more) of the following are present:
often loses temper
often argues with adults
often actively defies or refuses to comply with adults' requests or rules
often deliberately annoys people
often blames others for his or her mistakes or misbehavior
is often touchy or easily annoyed by others
is often angry and resentful
is often spiteful or vindictive
Note: Consider a criterion met only if the behavior occurs more frequently than is typically observed in individuals of comparable age and developmental level.
The disturbance in behavior causes clinically significant impairment in social, academic, or occupational functioning.
|
I was thinking about why a few of my HS students seem consistantly angry over what seem like very mundane or trivial things - especially when most of my students, in contrast, are so pleasant - and did a bit of research into this. Obviously when cultures and languages change so does almost everything else, but I think that research into this disorder and the theory behind it does help give us some useful insight. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scotticus
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChinaBoy wrote: |
These people have obviously no clue how to deal with kids. They would be laughed at. |
How do you handle missing all your NASCAR races? Do you stay up late, or download them off the internet and watch them later? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D.D.
Joined: 29 May 2008
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
They result from bad home situations with busy and selfish parents that don't spend time with their children.
I don't like calling them disorders because soon enough the medic will follow with the happy pills claiming them to be chemical conditions.
If daddy got off the soju, late nights and took the kids fishing or to a ball game the kids wouldn't be so starved for attention. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Goku
Joined: 10 Dec 2008
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it's coupled with both genetics and parenting.
I think a child can be born with an inclination to rebel. You see it in young children... very young. Some kids are just more stubborn than others. My family has naturally, calm , sedimentary people. But have a toddler cousin far removed that basically says no to everything. If you have been around babies enough, you've probably seen that even at really young ages, genetics plays a huge factor on energy levels and behavior.
Parental reaction to their behavior will determine if children continue this behavior.
Children who question the rules or disobey authority do not fear consequence. Or somehow think in their mind they have the right, power, or authority to do such. A good amount of confidence is healthy in developing children, but when it becomes control obsession it is dangerous.
One could imagine how a child could grow up psychologically defiant.
Let's say a parent makes a rule for their child, You must eat all your food at the table. But the child asks why and the parent doesn't give him a good reason. And they nag it on the child. However, they don't punish the child, or if they do, it is incosistent or unfair. Children don't attribute an immediate fair consequence for not following the rules, the child won't become fearful of authority. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
poet13
Joined: 22 Jan 2006 Location: Just over there....throwing lemons.
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"My family has naturally, calm , sedimentary people."
As opposed to...igneous or metamorphic people?
I think you meant sedentary.
My first son fits a lot of the descriptions provided. Not good. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sector7G
Joined: 24 May 2008
|
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scotticus wrote: |
ChinaBoy wrote: |
These people have obviously no clue how to deal with kids. They would be laughed at. |
How do you handle missing all your NASCAR races? Do you stay up late, or download them off the internet and watch them later? |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Auslegung
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Location: MB, SC
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
As for labeling people with diseases and sicknesses, I am totally against it in any instance. It has nothing to do with PC, I don't care about that, it's about the health of the unit. Murray Bowen, and to a lesser extent Edwin Friedman, have done great studies that have led them and others to believe that a child's acting out is symptomatic of a deeper problem in the family. By labeling the child we are further focusing the attention on the child, rather than the problem at hand. This is clearly seen in chapters 1-6 of Family Therapy in Clinical Practice by Murray Bowen, wherein he presents, in six different papers, a research study done in the late 50s on the treatment of family groups with a schizophrenic member.
All that to say, from my (admittedly limited) experience in Korea, the children are better behaved than in America. That is possible for a number of reasons, not least of which is a strong sense of culture, ethnicity, and belonging, but I think the labeling has a lot to do with it, too. Asians tend to avoid labels while Americans flock too them like moths to flame. Asian families have nearly as many (perhaps as many) problems as American families, but there is less of a discipline issue with children here. Any other thoughts? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thegadfly

Joined: 01 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
...so, according to the symptoms you listed, 99.876% of teenagers have ODD?
I mean, teenagers display those "symptoms" pretty much constantly...so to do so "more than is normal" for their peer group would require the invention of time travel, or worm-holes, or multi-dimensional emo parties or something....
In 17 years of teaching, I have only met ONE kid that I would agree was truly ADHD or ADD...have had hundreds with that label though. The labels didn't help any of the hundreds, and the one that DID have it would have loved to have skipped the label and just taken his lumps for letting his mind wander.
I am all for teachers learning something about psychology and human development, so maybe reading up on this might give people some ideas on how to deal with the problems -- but I would HATE there to be another "disease" to blame for those problems I like to call "life."
Depressed, angry, spiteful, argumentative, easily annoyed, touchy? Yeah, I call that Tuesday morning. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Auslegung wrote: |
As for labeling people with diseases and sicknesses, I am totally against it in any instance. It has nothing to do with PC, I don't care about that, it's about the health of the unit. Murray Bowen, and to a lesser extent Edwin Friedman, have done great studies that have led them and others to believe that a child's acting out is symptomatic of a deeper problem in the family. By labeling the child we are further focusing the attention on the child, rather than the problem at hand. This is clearly seen in chapters 1-6 of Family Therapy in Clinical Practice by Murray Bowen, wherein he presents, in six different papers, a research study done in the late 50s on the treatment of family groups with a schizophrenic member.
All that to say, from my (admittedly limited) experience in Korea, the children are better behaved than in America. That is possible for a number of reasons, not least of which is a strong sense of culture, ethnicity, and belonging, but I think the labeling has a lot to do with it, too. Asians tend to avoid labels while Americans flock too them like moths to flame. Asian families have nearly as many (perhaps as many) problems as American families, but there is less of a discipline issue with children here. Any other thoughts? |
I agree with your thoughts about trying to avoid labelling and focusing on specific issues instead. However, a couple of my students just seem to fit the symptoms so well. You know, the ones who whine like you're giving them a huge assignment just because it's time to sit down and start another lesson just like everyone else; the ones who seem to get angry no matter what teachers say and just hate cooperating like everyone else. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Auslegung
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Location: MB, SC
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I agree with your thoughts about trying to avoid labelling and focusing on specific issues instead. However, a couple of my students just seem to fit the symptoms so well. You know, the ones who whine like you're giving them a huge assignment just because it's time to sit down and start another lesson just like everyone else; the ones who seem to get angry no matter what teachers say and just hate cooperating like everyone else. |
That's exactly the point. As a young child, high levels of anxiety were probably present in the parents and likely a low level of functioning (I use anxiety and functioning in the evolutionary sense). Instead of dealing with their own problems, the parents began to focus on their child. This is classic triangularization, from a Bowen perspective: the child, without a proper defense mechanism, absorbed the anxiety and began expressing the symptoms the parents forced upon him. From a Bowen Theory perspective, there is little "nature" involved in the development of a child, and lots of "nurture."
A good example is found in the overbearing mother. When born, the mother may have thoughts that the child is so helpless, he needs all my attention. The mother may then begin to do everything for the child, preventing him/her from maturing. That makes sense, right? It happens time and again, over and over, in many different ways and with many different results.
I know it may sound a little odd or far-fetched, I believed that when I first began reading about it, but if you can find Family Therapy in Clinical Practice, you will be amazed at the research and results. You would be able to find it in an American library, but I don't know how you'd find it here. When I get some time I'll type out some lengthy quotes from his essays. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: China
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am sceptical of this. My daughter who was a very calm well behaved child. i think this was due to genetics and the fact that my wife and I had a very good relationship and never quarreled and the house was very quiet. We both hated t.v. so we never turned it on. My daughter began primary school and after a month or so we were called to the priciples office for a meeting. the school psychologist and her teacher suggested that she showed signs of ADD. I listened, I had never seen any behavior in this child that matched what they were describing. I was very sceptical, and fortunately so was the principle. So she was moved to a different class. Voila the new teacher reported that she was a very well behaved child and showed no signs of any problems. A new environment corrected the problems. Some studies have shown things like a noisy home, turmoil in the home even just parents who work too much or bring work home can create problems. Also a Canadian study showed that young female teachers were quicker to call Add in boys than girls, possibly because they are not used to the natural rowdiness of young boys. I call b.s. on this oppositional Defiance disorder. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
rollo wrote: |
I am sceptical of this. My daughter who was a very calm well behaved child. i think this was due to genetics and the fact that my wife and I had a very good relationship and never quarreled and the house was very quiet. We both hated t.v. so we never turned it on. My daughter began primary school and after a month or so we were called to the priciples office for a meeting. the school psychologist and her teacher suggested that she showed signs of ADD. I listened, I had never seen any behavior in this child that matched what they were describing. I was very sceptical, and fortunately so was the principle. So she was moved to a different class. Voila the new teacher reported that she was a very well behaved child and showed no signs of any problems. A new environment corrected the problems. Some studies have shown things like a noisy home, turmoil in the home even just parents who work too much or bring work home can create problems. Also a Canadian study showed that young female teachers were quicker to call Add in boys than girls, possibly because they are not used to the natural rowdiness of young boys. I call b.s. on this oppositional Defiance disorder. |
But this is a completely different kind of 'disorder' and we're talking about adolescents, not little children. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|