View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
greedy_bones

Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Location: not quite sure anymore
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:12 pm Post subject: Fellow Darwinists: What would you do? |
|
|
I've been teaching at a great hagwon for about a month. The pay is great, the hours are low, and I teach using novels like The BFG and Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH. At the school, there are also math and science classes.
Yesterday, in my free time, I was checking out some of the science books. I opened up the biology book and noticed it was an intelligent design book. The first two chapters are dedicated to explaining why evolution doesn't work, mostly by disproving Lamarkian evolution.
I don't teach science, but I'm truly bothered by the choice of textbooks. I know it's not my class, and I should just be worrying about my own classes, but the book really irks me. Would you guys bring this book up to the science teacher, or just let it be? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dean_burrito

Joined: 12 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: Re: Fellow Darwinists: What would you do? |
|
|
greedy_bones wrote: |
I've been teaching at a great hagwon for about a month. The pay is great, the hours are low, and I teach using novels like The BFG and Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH. At the school, there are also math and science classes.
Yesterday, in my free time, I was checking out some of the science books. I opened up the biology book and noticed it was an intelligent design book. The first two chapters are dedicated to explaining why evolution doesn't work, mostly by disproving Lamarkian evolution.
I don't teach science, but I'm truly bothered by the choice of textbooks. I know it's not my class, and I should just be worrying about my own classes, but the book really irks me. Would you guys bring this book up to the science teacher, or just let it be? |
Why not ask the science teacher. He or She might agree with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
quite possibly the person in charge of buying the textbooks is a right-wing christian conservative and knows very well what is in that book.
I've had students in non-science class bring up such matters when something evolutionary-related was discussed. yes, there are people in K who are trying to dismiss evolution, just like in the west, and yes, they are right-wing christian nutjobs, just like in the west (and I don't really give a flying f*ck how many flames this attracts and I'm not going to argue about it either - you know who you are)
OP you can ignore it - which I would recommend or not - at your own peril. that's a big can of worms if you must open it.
do let us know how it goes tho, if you decide to bring it up. it could get very interesting
sort of reminds me of when Da Vince code came out and I called a K friend to go see it and she said no, she couldn't because the church had come out against it and it was all lies so she didn't want to go, even tho I suggested she decide for herself. She appeared offended I would say such a thing (imagine! making up one's own mind!). needless to say I never asked her to go to the cinema again
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clyde
Joined: 09 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stay out of it. There is no reasoning with Christian idiots. It is not worth making an issue about because even if if there is blatant irrefutable proof, faith mongers have "faith" and that trumps all else academically. Sit back and chuckle my friend, and save the arguement for the hof after work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
clyde wrote: |
Stay out of it. There is no reasoning with Christian idiots. It is not worth making an issue about because even if if there is blatant irrefutable proof, faith mongers have "faith" and that trumps all else academically. Sit back and chuckle my friend, and save the arguement for the hof after work. |
True, and in the Kroean education system creationism isn't a very big deal, at any rate. The students will get the mainstream scientific explanations when they get to middle and high school and can decide for themselves then. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bibbitybop

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Supplement it with a lesson from 1984 (the novel) about how people will believe anything (2+2=5) if they are repeatedly taught. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cruisemonkey

Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Location: Hopefully, the same place as my luggage.
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You could probably try to explain to the science teacher why 'intellegent design' is not an alternative scientific theory, is not based on science and has nothing to do with science... but it would be like beating your head against a brick wall.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cruisemonkey wrote: |
You could probably try to explain to the science teacher why 'intellegent design' is not an alternative scientific theory, is not based on science and has nothing to do with science... but it would be like beating your head against a brick wall.  |
Well, there is the God Hypothesis.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jdog2050

Joined: 17 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
clyde wrote: |
Stay out of it. There is no reasoning with Christian idiots. It is not worth making an issue about because even if if there is blatant irrefutable proof, faith mongers have "faith" and that trumps all else academically. Sit back and chuckle my friend, and save the arguement for the hof after work. |
Right...pretty dangerous situation here. It's worse because a lot of the anti-creationist literature simply hasn't been translated yet so you'd have a hard time giving counter-examples that you could refer to. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
harlowethrombey

Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:15 pm Post subject: Re: Fellow Darwinists: What would you do? |
|
|
greedy_bones wrote: |
I've been teaching at a great hagwon for about a month. The pay is great, the hours are low, and I teach using novels like The BFG and Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH. At the school, there are also math and science classes.
Yesterday, in my free time, I was checking out some of the science books. I opened up the biology book and noticed it was an intelligent design book. The first two chapters are dedicated to explaining why evolution doesn't work, mostly by disproving Lamarkian evolution.
I don't teach science, but I'm truly bothered by the choice of textbooks. I know it's not my class, and I should just be worrying about my own classes, but the book really irks me. Would you guys bring this book up to the science teacher, or just let it be? |
heh, fantastic
there's nothing you can do and making a stink will only affect the subject you do teach. Just chalk it up to. . .something.
You should post the ID theory from the book. I always need a good chuckle.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Underwaterbob

Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Location: In Cognito
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:23 pm Post subject: Re: Fellow Darwinists: What would you do? |
|
|
greedy_bones wrote: |
The first two chapters are dedicated to explaining why evolution doesn't work, mostly by disproving Lamarkian evolution.
|
This is the worst and most often repeated argument against evolution. Never mind providing any proof of your own claim, holes in evolution means our theory is right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sarbonn

Joined: 14 Oct 2008 Location: Michigan
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I wasn't teaching science, I wouldn't care. I have a specific job here in Korea, and I perform that job. If a science teacher's job is to give bad science to students, then that's on them and their country. If they want to develop students who are incapable of competing with the rest of the world, that's on them, too.
On that note, I've had students come to me and ask me science questions because the science teacher told them something that didn't make any sense. The kids know I have degrees in physics and cell biology, so I answer them directly, and they go away happy. Usually, the teacher, who is really a glorified Korean English teacher, is the one teaching them science, so I don't even make a point of pointing out that she hasn't a clue what she's talking about. The kids are smart enough to figure that out on their own. They're also smart enough to come to the one person in the building that does have most of those answers they need. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
greedy_bones

Joined: 01 Jul 2007 Location: not quite sure anymore
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I decided to leave it alone. I may teach science at some point, since that's what my degree is in. If I end up teaching science, I will demand a different biology textbook.
I think my favorite part of the evolution section is the part where it deals with the age of the earth. It says something along the lines of "When the theory of evolution first came about, evolutionists thought that it took a few thousand years for organisms to evolve. Later, they realized it would take longer and changed the age of the earth to millions and then billions of years old."
Apparently, the age of the earth is determined by what works for evolution, not geology or astronomy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Simplicity
Joined: 16 Feb 2009 Location: South Korea
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BS.Dos.

Joined: 29 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stop thinking so positively. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|