Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Homosexuals in the Islamic World
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Imams and Homosexuality: A Post-gay Debate in the Netherlands
by Gert Hekma
The online version of this article can be found at: http://sexualities.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/5/2/237

Quote:
The reversal of �homosexual� attributions is remarkable. Since the
medieval crusades, Christians equated Islam and pederasty, and now
Muslims, quite similar to Subsaharan African leaders, attribute homosexuality
to the modern Western world. None saw homosexuality,
regrettably, ever as an enrichment of their sexual cultures. In both Europe
and the Arab world, modernization means heterosexualization while both
traditional and high-modern societies have a gayer reputation. But
nowhere and never, has the straight norm been broken.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Thu May 14, 2009 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Might be of interest to FMS:

Between Religion and Desire: Being Muslim and Gay in Indonesia
TOM BOELLSTORFF

http://www.anthro.uci.edu/faculty_bios/boellstorff/Boellstorff-AA.pdf

Quote:
After I read many books, I came to the belief that God has
a different plan for me to have made me a gay person. And
there is a kind of poetry that is good for me, that is good
for you and for all gay people. �God has given me the
ability to accept the things that I cannot change about
myself, and has given me the ability to change the things
that can be changed.� Because gayness [kegayan] is inside
of me. If it was just a thing like this [pointing to a chair],
maybe I would have already thrown it away by now. But
it�s everywhere inside of my body. Inside of my nerves,
inside of my blood. [conversation with author, May 5,
1998]

Whydo I think it�s not a sin? Because it is God who creates
us as gay . . . if for instance we have a gay soul [jiwa gay],
and we try to be like a hetero man, it�s transgressing God�s
will for us [justru keluar dari kodratnya kita]. [conversation
with author, August 19, 2000]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kimbop



Joined: 31 Mar 2008

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big_Bird wrote:

I can not affect what happens to homosexuals in other parts of the world. I can protest the killing of homosexuals in my own society, by writing letters to the media and my local MP. But I have no influence over the legal system of any other nation that chooses to implement the death penalty against homosexuality. Nor is it in my power to affect the mentality of those who live in such countries and give their support such laws.


Yes, you can affect what happens. Yes, it IS in your power. These muslim garbage pits are YOUR civilization. Bhutto gave her life in trying to change things. Are you trying?? No, you're lazing comfortably in MY secular civilized world, to which you contribute very little.

Big_Bird wrote:


In my own society, I can treat heterosexuals and homosexuals with the common decency that I believe every human being should recieve. I can bring up my children not to have archaic and retarded views about gay people. But since my children are not Iranian children, this will not likely affect the plight of homosexuals in Iran.


Do you think YOUR OWN society is British society? News flash: it ain't! YOUR "society" seems very much to be that of your parents, whom you would not dare insult by apostasizing. I digress: you CAN change your deplorable civilization! You're just too scared and lazy to try! (Just so we're clear, YOUR civilization is the MUSLIM WORLD!) Zahra Kazemi tried! Bhutto tried! Akbar Mohammadi tried! Ayaz Marhoni tried!

Stop blaming Obama, move to Saudi Arabia, cure cancer. Yowsers, I can;'t WAIT for the labour party to be kicked out!

Big_Bird wrote:
This is my one and only post on the topic:


Do us a favor and stick to your word.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Interested



Joined: 10 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kimbop wrote:
Big_Bird wrote:

I can not affect what happens to homosexuals in other parts of the world. I can protest the killing of homosexuals in my own society, by writing letters to the media and my local MP. But I have no influence over the legal system of any other nation that chooses to implement the death penalty against homosexuality. Nor is it in my power to affect the mentality of those who live in such countries and give their support such laws.


Yes, you can affect what happens. Yes, it IS in your power. These muslim garbage pits are YOUR civilization. Bhutto gave her life in trying to change things. Are you trying?? No, you're lazing comfortably in MY secular civilized world, to which you contribute very little.


OK, assuming your assertion is true and it IS in ones power, how about explaining exactly how one might use that power. I believe the OP asked for 'practical steps.' What are these practical steps that one might take?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Interested



Joined: 10 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 9:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought I'd add this to the sample of literature here:

Quote:
In traditional Islam there was no conception of the "homosexual" as a permanent identity or social role. As in ancient Greece, the real distinction in sexuality (as Michel Foucault showed) was between the penetrator and the penetrated. Medieval and early modern Islamdom were like the Greece of Plato. Adult males were the penetrators. In premodern Muslim society, women could be penetrated if they were legally married to the man or if they were his slaves. Likewise, slave-boys (catamites) could be penetrated, although it was typically disapproved of by the Muslim clerics. Exclusive adult male-male sexual relationships are not recorded, and a taste for a slave-boy did not stop a wealthy man from being married or from having liasons with his female slaves, as well. About half the famous love-poems of the medieval Baghdad literary figure, Abu Nuwas, appear to have been addressed to boys.

As slavery was forbidden in the Ottoman Empire in the course of the mid- to late-nineteenth century, obviously the keeping of slave-boys by wealthy men ceased. As society modernized, notions of sexuality moved away from the penetrator/penetrated model similar to that of the ancient Greeks, and toward a modern male-female binary. Many Muslim societies in the course of the twentieth century also moved away from polygamy toward a model of one man, one woman as the family unit.

Modern homosexual identity has only slowly emerged in the Middle East, and has sometimes faced great hostility. I say sometimes because real-life Muslim societies are not as puritanical as outsiders or local elites imagine. It is obvious that American writer Paul Bowles liked living in Tangiers precisely because anything went as long as it stayed fairly private. In cosmopolitan Muslim cultures like Egypt, at best the modern gay subculture is winked at, but sometimes there are crackdowns. The situation resembles the US in, say, the 1930s and 1940s, when the police would arrest gays. In a radical Muslim regime like Taliban Afghanistan, gays were executed. This was in part an attempt to keep discipline in the Taliban military ranks, which were notorious for gay liaisons. So there is a spectrum. It should be underlined that Taliban Afghanistan was weird and not like most of the Muslim world.


http://www.juancole.com/2006/03/sistani-on-homosexuality-andrew.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kimbop wrote:

Do you think YOUR OWN society is British society? News flash: it ain't! YOUR "society" seems very much to be that of your parents, whom you would not dare insult by apostasizing.


You sound as nutty as the chap in your avatar. Someone recently described certain posters here as "probably sitting in front of their computers in y-fronts and string vests with gravy stains on them, polishing their BNP membership badges." I think you are another suitable candidate.

I'm amused at the idea of insulting my parents by apostasising, given that they were both apostates themselves (formerly of Roman Catholic and English Protestant denomination). Is it possible for atheists to apostasise?

Kimbop wrote:

Big_Bird wrote:
This is my one and only post on the topic:


Do us a favor and stick to your word.


Ah, but now I'm getting interested...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

...so interested that, I decided to chat to a muslim about it. I know several Libyans and am quite fluent in Liblish, so I had coffee with a Libyan friend earlier and decided to ask him about the topic.

Yes, I do realise that my taking coffee with muslims implicitly condones the wholesale slaughter of gays in the Middle East, and some poor gay is probably being strung up right now thanks to my too tolerant behaviour. But nonetheless, ignoring all good decency I did such a thing, and now here is the conversation to the best of my memory. Nothing embellished, but probably things omitted due to lack of total recall. I find myself paying close attention to someone's individual grammar (having studied foreign languages, applied linguistics, and having been an ESL/EFL teacher) and so I've tried to remain as faithful to his syntax as possible. The conversation was intermittant as he kept getting calls, and I jotted down some notes inbetween.

Me: Are there many gay guys in Libya?
Him: There are many. I see them walk around the city every day, and I know many who come to my shop and some is my friend.

Me: What do they think of gays in Libya?
Him: [Shrugs] There is some that feel uncomfortable to talk to them, so they don't talk. {Sounds rather like the West to me} Some people is very sorry for them, because they is man but like girl. Most people don't care. If the gay do his thing in his house and not in the road, nobody care. Some gay is good man and don't hurt nobody.

Me: A lot of people are saying that Muslims believe homosexuals should be killed.
Him: I never hear this. [Laughing] I never kill a gay!

Me: Did you know they killed gays in Iran?
Him: No. But they has a crazy mind. No Libyan want to go there. And no Libyan ever said to me he should kill the gay.

Me: Does the Koran say that gays should be killed?
Him: I been Muslim all my life and read Koran many times. I never read that you must kill a gay. Sure, the gay is wrong thing [goes on to talk about Lot]. Gay not Islam, but killing is not Islam. Maybe he go to hell for being gay, but if I kill him, God gonna kick my arse and send me straight to the hell.

Me: So aren't you suppose to punish gays?
Him: Look, his arse for him and my arse for me. What I'm gonna do? {Translation: Look, what someone does with his arse is his own business. What am I supposed to do?} He give his arse as he like. If God want to punish him when he die, that's for him. I am not his God to kill him! {Translation: punishing gays is up to God, and he has no right to decide in God's place what should be done to a homosexual}.
Him: Look, [talking gently as if to a child] killing a human being is not easy. A human being is not a rat. You can't just kill a human because he do wrong thing. This for him and God. I just live my life as try to be good man, that's all.

Me: Well, did you know that there are 5 major schools of Islam, and 4 out of 5 say that homosexuals should be killed.
Him: [Clearly surprised]. You say one school does not say this? Then that is the right school. The others are wrong.
Him: Look, since Muhammad, there is many who try to understand the Koran. Some understands right, some understand wrong. Only the very scientific mind who study for many years can understand this {the Koran}. That is why I never spend my time to worry about this. Islam is very simple. Pray and be a good person. Don't lie. Don't steal. Don't kill. Always be kind to any human being. And don't kill nobody. Even if he gay. [Laughs]. Even if he Jewish! [Laughs again]. {A reference to a previous conversation I'd had with him about Jews and Islam} Treat all people good and don't hurt nobody. Then, if you do this, you will go to heaven. You don't need to know anything else. Just be good person.

So, what did I get from this? Well, some Muslims clearly have a live and let live attitude. Homosexuals in Tripoli don't sound particularly oppressed, and walk around openly without fear, even if it's not quite the life of a gay man in San Francisco. Although some Islamic scholars may be advocating death to gays, this message hasn't always percolated down to the man in the street, who apparantly doesn't always have that great a respect for all Islamic clerics anyway.

And last of all, being a Muslim doesn't necessarily equate with being 'hate-filled' and preaching death to homosexuals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Leslie Cheswyck



Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So do you think Islamic extremism will peter out eventually?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Frankly Mr Shankly



Joined: 13 Feb 2008

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leslie Cheswyck wrote:
So do you think Islamic extremism will peter out eventually?


Wow, an intelligent question here on the DESL CE forum! Depends on a number of factors, IMHO, but not for a while.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frankly Mr Shankly wrote:
Leslie Cheswyck wrote:
So do you think Islamic extremism will peter out eventually?


Wow, an intelligent question here on the DESL CE forum! Depends on a number of factors, IMHO, but not for a while.


It's certainly on the decline in Indonesia, from what I can make out. Islamicism (not Islam) only really started in the 1920s in Egypt (at least from my understanding) and has only been spread about the world in recent decades. Unfortunately Britain - with its (former) culture of freespeech and political tolerance - was used as a springboard for such dissemination in the last 2 decades, with exiled radicals from the Middle East finding a refuge there. Unhindered by the authorities (unlike in their home countries) they were able to export their ideology to other parts of the world (including such places as Indonesia), as well as recruit from British universities, all of it greatly financed by Wahhabi Arabia. I think it is a pernicious fad that will eventually lose favour (if it isn't starting to already), given that the Islamists' first victims are generally muslims themselves. Think Algeria, for example.

My Libyan friends love the fact that Gaddafi throws anyone caught indulging in this kind of radical islamicism straight into his prisons. You don't find groups like Hizb ut-Tahrir taking root there. That is one of the few things they like about Gaddafi. They are Muslims and want to live an Islamic lifestyle. But they don't want crazy extremists forcing their tyranny onto them and their families.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Islamicism (not Islam) only really started in the 1920s in Egypt (at least from my understanding)


And here, we've found the problem. Absolutely one of the most incredibly silly statements in the history of the internet.

How many tens of millions would have to be killed in the name of islam prior to Occidental colonization for a dedicated leftist to admit that perhaps some of the problems today actually linger on from the pre-colonial period?

Never mind.

http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_2_pim-fortuyn.html

I'll wait.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Frankly Mr Shankly



Joined: 13 Feb 2008

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here, in Indonesia, we've just had a general election in which the religious parties have not fared well, but then again, neither have the other nationalist parties, save for SBY's Partai Demokrat. The Muslim Brotherhood-inspired PKS did the best of all Islamic Parties, garnering a mere 8% of the overall vote. Interestingly enough, though, when it looked like the PKS might do better, some sources in Australia were talking up the possibility of fostering working relationships with them as they saw their tough anti-corruption stand as a positive. From the ground here, though, I still abhor the buggers since their main targets seem to be Jaipong and Dangdut dancing and enforcing the kind of moral codes in places they control like West Java and Tangerang that will make the place more like Kuwait or the east coast of Malaysia.

Other Islamist parties, milder incarnations like the PKB, PPP and PAN, have not done so well and political scientists posit this is because they all roughly offer the same moderate Islamist agenda. Most splits are along personal lines.

What is crudely called 'Jihadist' behaviour, violence in the name of Islam has been in retreat, I believe, due to the well-coordinated efforts of Indonesian and Australian law enforcement to take down the major players of Jemaah Islamiyah. Groups such as Laskar Jihad, who were more of a political creation of the armed forces, are nowhere to be seen. The only group that remains a concern, and who again are more of a criminal gang than an Islamist grouping, are the FPI, who have been banned, but continue to defy this.

The one factor I am unsure of is the rise of a fairly strict, but at the same time, apolitical, form of Wahabism. According to the International Crisis Group, communities of like-minded people are choosing the hijra option and opting out, forming their own communities. These could still provide the impetus for political violence, but how widespread they are, I do not know.

The big thing is that Islam here tends to strengthen in times of political and economic uncertainty. That has particularly been the case in the last decade or so, but now with SBY certain to control the house and win the presidency, and with the economy ticking over at around 4% growth rates, the place is looking to be one of the more stable countries in SE Asia.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mises wrote:
Quote:
Islamicism (not Islam) only really started in the 1920s in Egypt (at least from my understanding)


And here, we've found the problem. Absolutely one of the most incredibly silly statements in the history of the internet.

How many tens of millions would have to be killed in the name of islam prior to Occidental colonization for a dedicated leftist to admit that perhaps some of the problems today actually linger on from the pre-colonial period?

Never mind.

http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_2_pim-fortuyn.html

I'll wait.


Sorry, but this is just typical of your told-you-so hysterical nonsense. On this issue you lose all reason. First of all, we are discussing present times, and I'm not interested in harking back to events of the seventh century. Anyhow, millions and millions of people have been killed all over the world in the name of religion, Christians being some of the biggest perpetrators. But the real reasons for those wars were rarely religion but politics, greed or self aggrandisement. Religion was generally a rallying cry to justify other underlying motives.

Back to the here and now: Islamicism is a radical political/religious ideology that was initially inspired (and spurred on) by such writers as Qutb. It first reified itself inthe form of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and since then even more pernicious organisations have been on the rise (Al Qaeda etc).

It's an ideology that is quite foreign to older generations of Muslims. The political brand of Islam being disseminated through Britain's universities (and prisons) is quite unrecognisable to the immigrant parents of those younger people who are seduced by it. Most Muslims have traditionally practiced Sufi influenced forms of Islam, and this more fundamental and highly political movement spreading across the globe is a phenonemon perculiar to recent times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

1
Quote:
Islamicism (not Islam) only really started in the 1920s in Egypt (at least from my understanding) and has only been spread about the world in recent decades


2
Quote:
First of all, we are discussing present times, and I'm not interested in harking back to events of the seventh century.


If you insist on narrowing the field of relevant history to only the time in which you want to discuss, I suppose it is quite easy to then place all problems within a politically useful yet inaccurate time line.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2009 4:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mises wrote:
1
Quote:
Islamicism (not Islam) only really started in the 1920s in Egypt (at least from my understanding) and has only been spread about the world in recent decades


2
Quote:
First of all, we are discussing present times, and I'm not interested in harking back to events of the seventh century.


If you insist on narrowing the field of relevant history to only the time in which you want to discuss, I suppose it is quite easy to then place all problems within a politically useful yet inaccurate time line.


When Lesley (slyly) posed that question, it was assumed the 'Islamic extremism' he is refering to is that which has blighted the modern world in recent decades. It is the Current Events Forum, after all. In pretending his question was asked in good faith, FMS and I responded to it in that context.


Last edited by Big_Bird on Mon May 18, 2009 4:56 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International