| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| And if that's impossible, than the rest of the whole theory falls apart. |
I'd be interested to know if anyone besides the OP can see any logic here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bacasper wrote: |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| And if that's impossible, than the rest of the whole theory falls apart. |
I'd be interested to know if anyone besides the OP can see any logic here. |
Ok, let me help you with it.
Commandeering Flight 77, landing it elsewhere, taking all the passengers and crew off the plane, killing them, dismembering their bodies in such a fashion as to appear they were crash victims, doing so in a manner completely fooling every pathologist and forensic scientist from whatever country that has ever examined the remains, then distributing all the remains around the Pentagon crash site in such an expert and organized fashion so as to raise absolutely no doubt, all within a space of two hours.
Possible or not? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| bacasper wrote: |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| And if that's impossible, than the rest of the whole theory falls apart. |
I'd be interested to know if anyone besides the OP can see any logic here. |
Ok, let me help you with it.
Commandeering Flight 77, landing it elsewhere, taking all the passengers and crew off the plane, killing them, dismembering their bodies in such a fashion as to appear they were crash victims, doing so in a manner completely fooling every pathologist and forensic scientist from whatever country that has ever examined the remains, then distributing all the remains around the Pentagon crash site in such an expert and organized fashion so as to raise absolutely no doubt, all within a space of two hours.
Possible or not? |
Who believes that?
What exactly is "the" "whole theory" anyway? Is there only one?
And that implausible scenario you cooked up from somewhere being impossible means that the conspiracy theory that 19 Arabs armed with boxcutters planned and executed the entire 9/11 operation (and everything else that entails) is therefore true?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bacasper wrote: |
| Who believes that? |
Ok so you are saying that it's impossible, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It is impossible for someone to have commandeered Flight 77, landing it elsewhere, taking all the passengers and crew off the plane, killing them, dismembering their bodies in such a fashion as to appear they were crash victims, doing so in a manner completely fooling every pathologist and forensic scientist from whatever country that has ever examined the remains, then distributing all the remains around the Pentagon crash site in such an expert and organized fashion so as to raise absolutely no doubt, all within a space of two hours. Agreed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Was that the scenario from the early "Loose Change?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bacasper wrote: |
| Was that the scenario from the early "Loose Change?" |
You're the one who asked:
| bacasper wrote: |
| I'd be interested to know if anyone besides the OP can see any logic here. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Do you think it was impossible, yes or no? Simple question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| bacasper wrote: |
| Was that the scenario from the early "Loose Change?" |
You're the one who asked:
| bacasper wrote: |
| I'd be interested to know if anyone besides the OP can see any logic here. |
|
You're the OP. Why did you respond? Simple question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why did I respond to your question?
Because you said you don't understand the logic in the discussion.
You're right, yours is a simple question. Asked and answered.
Now getting back on topic, how about answering my question?
It is impossible for someone to have commandeered Flight 77, landing it elsewhere, taking all the passengers and crew off the plane, killing them, dismembering their bodies in such a fashion as to appear they were crash victims, doing so in a manner completely fooling every pathologist and forensic scientist from whatever country that has ever examined the remains, then distributing all the remains around the Pentagon crash site in such an expert and organized fashion so as to raise absolutely no doubt, all within a space of two hours. Agreed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
Why did I respond to your question?
Because you said you don't understand the logic in the discussion. |
Let's read carefully now. What is asked was if anyone else followed your logic here. Doesn't look good for you so far.
But since you are going to insist on explaining it anyway, knock yourself out. Let's say it is impossible. So what? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arjuna

Joined: 31 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| It is impossible for someone [1] to have commandeered Flight 77, landing it elsewhere, taking all the passengers and crew off the plane, killing them, [2] dismembering their bodies in such a fashion as to appear they were crash victims, doing so in a manner completely fooling every pathologist and forensic scientist from whatever country that has ever examined the remains, then distributing all the remains around the Pentagon crash site in such an expert and organized fashion so as to raise absolutely no doubt, all within a space of two hours. Agreed? |
1. That is very simple. It could also have been done in other ways.
2. This was not necessary, and it was not done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| arjuna wrote: |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| It is impossible for someone [1] to have commandeered Flight 77, landing it elsewhere, taking all the passengers and crew off the plane, killing them, [2] dismembering their bodies in such a fashion as to appear they were crash victims, doing so in a manner completely fooling every pathologist and forensic scientist from whatever country that has ever examined the remains, then distributing all the remains around the Pentagon crash site in such an expert and organized fashion so as to raise absolutely no doubt, all within a space of two hours. Agreed? |
1. That is very simple. It could also have been done in other ways. |
Such as?
| Quote: |
| 2. This was not necessary, and it was not done. |
So you agree with me that the human remains found at the site were actually the passengers/victims of the hijacking and crash...? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arjuna

Joined: 31 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| arjuna wrote: |
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| It is impossible for someone [1] to have commandeered Flight 77, landing it elsewhere, taking all the passengers and crew off the plane, killing them, [2] dismembering their bodies in such a fashion as to appear they were crash victims, doing so in a manner completely fooling every pathologist and forensic scientist from whatever country that has ever examined the remains, then distributing all the remains around the Pentagon crash site in such an expert and organized fashion so as to raise absolutely no doubt, all within a space of two hours. Agreed? |
1. That is very simple. It could also have been done in other ways. |
Such as? |
The flight never existed, most probably.
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
| Quote: |
| 2. This was not necessary, and it was not done. |
So you agree with me that the human remains found at the site were actually the passengers/victims of the hijacking and crash...? |
How could there have been any remains? The report on the remains of the passengers was fake. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| arjuna wrote: |
How could there have been any remains? The report on the remains of the passengers was fake. |
Got a link? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|