Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The etymology of "Octopus" and its plurals

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which do you use to pluralize "octopus"?
-i
70%
 70%  [ 17 ]
-es
20%
 20%  [ 5 ]
-odes
8%
 8%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 24

Author Message
cubanlord



Joined: 08 Jul 2005
Location: In Japan!

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:56 am    Post subject: The etymology of "Octopus" and its plurals Reply with quote

Man, have I read more than I wanted to read about whether or not Octopus should be -i or -es. Wow. So, which do you prefer? For the sake of my students, I am going with -es, even though I tend to use -i a lot more.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crossmr



Joined: 22 Nov 2008
Location: Hwayangdong, Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The plural octopi is hypercorrect, and comes from the mistaken notion that the -us in octopus is a Latin second declension ending. The word is actually treated as a third declension noun in Latin. The plural octopodes follows the Ancient Greek plural, ὀκτώποδες (oktōpodes).

Sources differ on which plurals are acceptable: Fowler�s Modern English Usage asserts that "the only acceptable plural in English is octopuses", while Merriam-Webster and other dictionaries accept octopi as a plural form. The Oxford English Dictionary lists octopuses, octopi, and octopodes (the order reflecting decreasing frequency of use), stating that the last form is rare.

The term octopod (either plural octopods and octopodes can be found) is taken from the taxonomic order Octopoda but has no classical equivalent, and is not necessarily synonymous (it can encompass any member of that order). The collective form octopus is usually reserved for animals consumed for food.


Octopi is clearly wrong, but becoming "right". Much like I imagine "can't have" will be one day...
otherwise just flip a coin, roll a dice.. if the experts can't decide there is no point in forcing anyone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Leslie Cheswyck



Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I want to say octovagina but that's probably not it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChopChaeJoe



Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Octopuses is correct, though it sounds silly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arthur Dent



Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Location: Kochu whirld

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octopi

I use octopi. 'es' is more fun though.

Amazing creatures. I used to dive for them. Had to stop, just too amazing an animal to fish. Beautiful to see though. Biggest I ever caught was about 20 + kilos. I saw a bigger one at about 30 metres. Wasn't going to mess with it. The beak is as hard as a birds beak.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andrewchon



Joined: 16 Nov 2008
Location: Back in Oz. Living in ISIS Aust.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought it was octopussy...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReeseDog



Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The word being of Greek rather than Latin origin, either octopus or octopuses is a correct plural. As has been pointed out upthread, though, through ignorance and popular use octopi is becoming acceptable as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
toadhjo



Joined: 07 Apr 2009

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 12:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

crossmr wrote:
Much like I imagine "can't have" will be one day...


Could you give me an example of this? Do you have "can't have" in place of "couldn't have"?

Because saying something "I can't have this madness going on my message boards!" seems grammatically correct to be, at least in an informal context (though I'm not a grammar master by any means).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
yingwenlaoshi



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Location: ... location, location!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 2:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I want to be under the sea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Straphanger



Joined: 09 Oct 2008
Location: Chilgok, Korea

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ReeseDog wrote:
The word being of Greek rather than Latin origin, either octopus or octopuses is a correct plural. As has been pointed out upthread, though, through ignorance and popular use octopi is becoming acceptable as well.

All of you need to consult a dictionary.
m-w.com wrote:
Main Entry:
oc�to�pus Listen to the pronunciation of octopus
Pronunciation:
\ˈ�k-tə-pəs, -ˌpu̇s\
Function:
noun
Inflected Form(s):
plural oc�to�pus�es or oc�to�pi Listen to the pronunciation of octopi \-ˌpī\
Etymology:
New Latin Octopod-, Octopus, from Greek oktōpous
Date:
1758

1: any of a genus (Octopus) of cephalopod mollusks that have eight muscular arms equipped with two rows of suckers ; broadly : any octopod excepting the paper nautilus2: something that resembles an octopus especially in having many centrally directed branches
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chris_J2



Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Location: From Brisbane, Au.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:24 am    Post subject: Plurals Reply with quote

What about platypus?

'Platypi' sounds better than platypuses!

From Wiki:

Quote:
There is no universally agreed upon plural of "platypus" in the English language. Scientists generally use "platypuses" or simply "platypus". Colloquially, "platypi" is also used for the plural, although this is pseudo-Latin;[3] the Greek plural would be "platypodes".


And how about locus, radius?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Straphanger



Joined: 09 Oct 2008
Location: Chilgok, Korea

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:37 am    Post subject: Re: Plurals Reply with quote

chris_J2 wrote:
And how about locus, radius?

I don't trust any word that ends in two Is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iammac2002



Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Location: 'n Beter plek.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yingwenlaoshi wrote:
I want to be under the sea.


I have 8 pussies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thiuda



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Location: Religion ist f�r Sklaven geschaffen, f�r Wesen ohne Geist.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"One hippopotami / Cannot get on a bus. Because one hippopotami / Is two hippopotamus." - Alan Sherman

Personally, when it comes to questions of usage, I usually go with the flow, i.e. consult a corpus. A quick check on Google lists approx. 544.000 results for Octopi, 366.000 for Octopuses, but only 21.500 for Octopodes. So, while Octopi may not be strictly speaking correct, it seems to be the most popular form.

There is a very good passage in Steven Pinker's Words and Rules which deals with Latin and Greek derived plurals. He states, "These nouns come from science and academia, and the plurals were borrowed directly from Latin or Greek together with the singulars. They must be irregular forms that are memorized as a list, not the products of a rule attaching -i or -ae, because most nouns shun these plurals except in the speech of people with an attitude.

Latin- and Greek-inspired plurals in a sense are still not part of the English language. They are not acquired as part of the mother tongue in childhood, and are uncommon in everyday speech with nonacademic adults. Instead they are learned in school together with the Pythagorean theorem and the dates of the Peloponnesian War. Since they follow no living rule, and people couldn't have memorized them unless they went to the right schools and read the right books, they are shibboleths of membership in the educated elite and gotcha! material for pedants and know-it-alls" (Pinker, 1999: pp. 54-55).

He goes on and says, "In any case, whenever pedants correct, ordinary speakers hypercorrect, so the attempt to foist "proper" Greek and Latin plurals has bred pseudo-erudite horrors such as axia (more than one axiom), peni, rhinoceri, and [octopi]. It should be "[] octopuses." The -us in Octopus is not the Latin noun ending that switches to -i in the plural, but the Greek pous (foot). The etymologically defensible octopodes is not an improvement" (ibid.).

The book also discusses irregular verbs and the rules that govern their creation and usage. I recommend it for a great read.

Pinker, S. 1999. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. Perennial, HarperCollins, NY.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International