|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bacasper wrote: |
Fox wrote: |
Any bill that passes which does not include a viable public option is not only not a win, it's the most pathetic of losses for the Democratic Party: a loss caused purely and only by their own actions. |
No. The passage of a public option would be a loss for Democrats - specifically, a loss of millions of dollars in campaign contributions from the health industry. |
That extra money is meaningless if it comes with a loss of seats rather than a gain in seats. Campaign contributions are valuable only insofar as they can gain additional seats and/or prevent the loss of current seats for the party. The corrupt, detestable actions of the Democratic party is going to cost them seats, not gain them seats. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fox wrote: |
bacasper wrote: |
Fox wrote: |
Any bill that passes which does not include a viable public option is not only not a win, it's the most pathetic of losses for the Democratic Party: a loss caused purely and only by their own actions. |
No. The passage of a public option would be a loss for Democrats - specifically, a loss of millions of dollars in campaign contributions from the health industry. |
That extra money is meaningless if it comes with a loss of seats rather than a gain in seats. Campaign contributions are valuable only insofar as they can gain additional seats and/or prevent the loss of current seats for the party. The corrupt, detestable actions of the Democratic party is going to cost them seats, not gain them seats. |
These politicians are not thinking of any common good, but only of their own jobs on the line. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a loyal minion of Taibbi's, and I've been waiting for his health care piece before actually thinking about this issue, and how it will shape the future of the United States. His piece is out now in print, and RS offers a short glimpse into it, and 3 videos where MT speaks about his work.
http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/index.php/2009/08/19/matt-taibbi-on-health-care-reform-sick-and-wrong/
I'll post the article when I find it. There is usually a 7 day lag between his stuff being on newsstands and on the net.
As MT describes it, this bill is a nightmare and the height of corporatist absurdity. Fox, BBum, Kuros, Ya-ta and the rest of you are likely going to be angered. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Regarding Video 1: He does a really good job highlighting the administrative benefits of a well-run single player. My mother works in the health care industry in administration, and she's always talking about the immense complexities involved in medical billing in the current system. I do want to say, however, that according to her, he grossly over-states the "simplicity and ease" of billing for Medicare. Medicare actually has fairly complex -- and sometimes counterintuitive -- rules about what you can bill, what you need in order to bill, and how you need to go about it.
One example: if the hospital purchases a particular expensive scanning device (I'm sorry, I forget the exact name of the device in question, this conversation happened a while ago), they can bill procedures using it to Medicare. However, if several hospitals pool resources and buy one TOGETHER, and its ownership is shared, Medicare doesn't consider it an in-house procedure and thus won't accept the bill, even though this is the most efficient way to manage highly expensive, rarely use equipment. She also says its very frequent that the hospital does everything right, and Medicare's administrative employees still fail to come through with prompt payment. Hospitals are absolutely required to follow certain time guidelines, but Medicare's administration often fails to behave in the same punctual fashion.
So while it's certainly true that hospitals do complain of the repayment rates of Medicare, there also are efficiency problems that need to be resolved, because right now it's actually a fairly messy patch work. This doesn't mean a successful, efficient government run system can't be created, but it does show the need for it to be created carefully and with the informed advice of people who have worked in the health care industry, but no longer do (and thus have no direct incentive to create a self-serving system).
Regarding Video 2: I really like his, "When the Drug Companies are for health care reform, you know it's corrupt," style of presentation, because it's just so obviously true. And yes, the total lack of single-payer advocacy shows you exactly what's really going on here. It's disgusting.
Regarding Video 3: He articulates well something I was afraid of based on what I've been hearing. I don't want health care reform to just turn into an Insurance Industry bailout in the form of forcing everyone to pay for their terrible "product" and handing out tax credits to the people who can't afford it. As he says, that not only doesn't make anything better, it will make things worse. This is why I feel any bill that doesn't at least have a public option is worse than no reform at all. Howard Dean is completely correct: we need to either put up a bill with a public option (or a single payer bill, which would be better), or simply put up nothing.
Video didn't really tell me anything new, so it hasn't increased my indignation over the way this is all going, but I would hope an average, semi-informed citizen hearing all this for the first time would be very angry upon hearing it. Nice find. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pluto
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My views have been well established irt health care. I'll just say a couple of things.
Re: Health care as market failure.
It is not market failure and you can't simply say it is market failure when the gov't owns 50% of the health care market. Also, irt medicare/medicaid, they've got a practical monopsony over the price of medicines. What do you think that does to prices, supply and quality?
Re: Morality
Like I said morality begins with the individual as the individual pass through this world. There is no overall good, no greater good, there is no national effort, there is no cause greater than oneself(unless the individual deems this to be so) or whatever silly nonsense statists of all stripes have tried to promote with their meaningless euphemisms.. So long as a person lives peacefully and commits no crime against person or property, that is good enough. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Re: Health care as market failure.
It is not market failure and you can't simply say it is market failure when the gov't owns 50% of the health care market. |
A market is the aggregation and dissemination of information as reflected in prices. If there is no open pricing, there is no market.
This is just as it is. I make no further attempt to ponder the subject. The American health system is not market based. That doesn't mean that reforms 1,2,3 etc aren't completely reasonable ideas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rRE5UK6NQU&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eyoutube%2Ecom%2Fuser%2FHedrickDavid&feature=player_profilepage
Watch this video.
This man represents tens of millions of Americans.
It is no longer a secret that the Federal Reserve, ie the US Government, caused the first Great Depression and all the recessions since.
It is no longer a secret that Government at all levels is the cause of our social and political problems.
It is no longer a secret that socialism is our enemy, that all government is socialist, and the Democrats are Fascist-Socialists.
It is no longer a secret that the days of the socialists' dominion over America are numbered.
Listen to the crowd.
A revolution IS coming. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ubermenzch

Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Location: bundang, south korea
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
ontheway wrote: |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rRE5UK6NQU&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eyoutube%2Ecom%2Fuser%2FHedrickDavid&feature=player_profilepage
Watch this video.
This man represents tens of millions of Americans.
It is no longer a secret that the Federal Reserve, ie the US Government, caused the first Great Depression and all the recessions since.
It is no longer a secret that Government at all levels is the cause of our social and political problems.
It is no longer a secret that socialism is our enemy, that all government is socialist, and the Democrats are Fascist-Socialists.
It is no longer a secret that the days of the socialists' dominion over America are numbered.
Listen to the crowd.
A revolution IS coming. |
OnTheWay, please read this article if you've time.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/23/opinion/23rich.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
ubermenzch wrote: |
ontheway wrote: |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rRE5UK6NQU&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eyoutube%2Ecom%2Fuser%2FHedrickDavid&feature=player_profilepage
Watch this video.
This man represents tens of millions of Americans.
It is no longer a secret that the Federal Reserve, ie the US Government, caused the first Great Depression and all the recessions since.
It is no longer a secret that Government at all levels is the cause of our social and political problems.
It is no longer a secret that socialism is our enemy, that all government is socialist, and the Democrats are Fascist-Socialists.
It is no longer a secret that the days of the socialists' dominion over America are numbered.
Listen to the crowd.
A revolution IS coming. |
OnTheWay, please read this article if you've time.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/23/opinion/23rich.html |
The writer of the article still sees this as a left-right battle on a political map that is used by the socialists to obfuscate reality. Unfortunately, he has been befuddled by his own bloviation.
The protesters today do NOT support the Republicans over the Democrats.
They support Liberty over Tyrrany.
They have watched their Liberty dwindle at the hands of both parties and they support neither.
They are giving fair warning of what is to come.
The fact is that it is a battle for Liberty. It is Liberty vs. Socialism and there is no middle ground.
The author of the article, while protesting "scare tactics," attempts to use his own. He trots out Timothy McVeigh. This is a mistake for several reasons.
The first is that McVeigh is an example of why the government should not dare to go too far. All government is socialism. All government is evil. And the people will tolerate only so much.
Sure, you have the fascists who are in league with the simple minded, who want national health care and every other social program, and are so ignorant as to be unable to see simple reality. They believe in a fairy tail religion, of the government good fairy that solves all problems and can do no wrong. They have been infused with the indoctrination of the socialists. (Which is what the socialists promised when they took over the education industry.)
But you have others who will stand up and fight when things go too far. They can see it coming, and if it comes with unemployment rising, the dollar falling, foreign wars raging and any kind of national health care coming, then watch out.
The first revolution only had the support of 15% of the American people at the time. A smaller percentage could do the same today.
Remember that the speaker on the video is a military vet. The military would have a large percentage who would join a revolution - today. They take their oath to support the Constitution seriously. When the revolution comes, the best the government can hope for is that the military will sit it out on the sidelines.
It is also important that McVeigh didn't want to start a revolution. He wanted political change. But, the government killed his political party. The US has not had free elections since the teen years of the 1900s, if not before. Ballot access laws, campaign regulations, finance regulations, illegally removing alternative candidates from the ballot, and illegally placing candidates of the two parties ON the ballot, such as in Texas last year, means we have no free elections. The governemnt killed the Populist party which would have sufficed for McVeigh, if we had had political choice and free elections.
It is also important NOT to bring up McVeigh at a time when there are angry extremists who have found a cause, have found many leaders, are gaining strength, and are just waiting for a match to set things off. This "scare" tactic will instead create a folk hero. A martyr. Right now, McVeigh is still largely seen as evil. But the writer should leave him dead and buried. Bringing up his ghost will rehabilitate him. And a dead martyr can be defeated only with great time, expense and difficulty.
Finally, the writer of the article fails to comprehend that while he sees this as a game of democracy in action, others do not. Liberty is a science. It is defined absolutely. The government when it exceeds very strict limits becomes a criminal. It is the right of the people to overthrow that government. Even if it's only 15% of the people. Liberty trumps democracy at all times. Liberty is paramount.
All rights are individual rights.
The government has no rights. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ontheway wrote: |
The protesters today do NOT support the Republicans over the Democrats. |
I'm certain quite a few of them do, in fact, support the Republicans over the Democrats. Why do you make blanket, intuitively false statements like this?
ontheway wrote: |
The fact is that it is a battle for Liberty. It is Liberty vs. Socialism and there is no middle ground. |
Then Liberty is going to lose. Of course, because reality doesn't resemble the extremist ideologue's mindset, a middle ground will be reached which makes most people content.
ontheway wrote: |
The military would have a large percentage who would join a revolution - today. They take their oath to support the Constitution seriously.
When the revolution comes, the best the government can hope for is that the military will sit it out on the sidelines. |
Wishful thinking.
ontheway wrote: |
The government when it exceeds very strict limits becomes a criminal. It is the right of the people to overthrow that government. Even if it's only 15% of the people. Liberty trumps democracy at all times. Liberty is paramount. |
So now you're creating your own set of laws and judging the government criminal according to those laws. Your desire to see the 15% minority's will triumph over the 85% majority's will is tyrannical. In fact, it would be text-book tyranny, if not for the fact that you're not actually in power. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
ontheway wrote: |
The first revolution only had the support of 15% of the American people at the time. A smaller percentage could do the same today. |
Margaret Mead wrote: |
Do not doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ubermenzch

Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Location: bundang, south korea
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
bacasper wrote: |
ontheway wrote: |
The first revolution only had the support of 15% of the American people at the time. A smaller percentage could do the same today. |
Margaret Mead wrote: |
Do not doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. |
|
Yes, but change the world to what? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
ubermenzch wrote: |
bacasper wrote: |
ontheway wrote: |
The first revolution only had the support of 15% of the American people at the time. A smaller percentage could do the same today. |
Margaret Mead wrote: |
Do not doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. |
|
Yes, but change the world to what? |
It's viral. It's coming. It's unstoppable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2y5VuEOors |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|