Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Left wing, but dont care about climate change
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
OnTheOtherSide



Joined: 29 Feb 2008

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fox wrote:
OnTheOtherSide wrote:
What you are failing to acknowledge is that our system of agriculture drives other species into extinction and consumes land. Other species USE the land and leave the balance in tact, humans TAKE OVER the land and ruin it for all other species. That's the key difference.


It's not a key difference at all. Any species would drive any other number of species into extinction if it could do so and doing so would benefit it. That's not playing god, it's totally natural. There's no altruism in nature; even human environmentalism at its core is about humans, because we benefit from a world with other species in it.

All you're pointing out is that humans are more capable than other species. There's nothing unnatural about that, and it's not playing god. It's just plain old natural competition.

OnTheOtherSide wrote:
This system has been working. But it's like a runaway train that has not quite crashed yet. The crash will come innevitably.


And if it does, it will be exactly the same as when the goats run out of grass. They over-grazed, and over-reproduced, and a backlash occurs as a result.

Your attempt to condemn anything humans do as unnatural is simply in error.


Any species WOULD do this.

But humans are the only species that CAN and ARE doing it.

Major difference. You are speaking in "woulds" and "coulds". I'm speaking on what is actually happening right now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OnTheOtherSide wrote:
I am not going to argue this. I've spoken my piece. Time will be the judge. There is nothing we have right now that can save us from the threat we pose to ourselves. But there are new diseases being created right now that will one day be unleashed on the public.....

Is your name John Holdren? Do you know something we don't?

I suppose your solution will be to give lethal, brain damaging, and totally useless vaccines to our women and children...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OnTheOtherSide



Joined: 29 Feb 2008

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

visitorq wrote:
OnTheOtherSide wrote:
I am not going to argue this. I've spoken my piece. Time will be the judge. There is nothing we have right now that can save us from the threat we pose to ourselves. But there are new diseases being created right now that will one day be unleashed on the public.....

Is your name John Holdren? Do you know something we don't?

I suppose your solution will be to give lethal, brain damaging, and totally useless vaccines to our women and children...


There's nothing pretty about killing lots of people to save the world.

But. Ya gotta do what ya gotta do Wink

The only other option is to let things keep going as they are. Until the Earth is so messed up and depleted of resources that it can only support a billion people anyway.

Either way. Big time death is coming.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OnTheOtherSide wrote:
Fox wrote:
OnTheOtherSide wrote:
What you are failing to acknowledge is that our system of agriculture drives other species into extinction and consumes land. Other species USE the land and leave the balance in tact, humans TAKE OVER the land and ruin it for all other species. That's the key difference.


It's not a key difference at all. Any species would drive any other number of species into extinction if it could do so and doing so would benefit it. That's not playing god, it's totally natural. There's no altruism in nature; even human environmentalism at its core is about humans, because we benefit from a world with other species in it.

All you're pointing out is that humans are more capable than other species. There's nothing unnatural about that, and it's not playing god. It's just plain old natural competition.

OnTheOtherSide wrote:
This system has been working. But it's like a runaway train that has not quite crashed yet. The crash will come innevitably.


And if it does, it will be exactly the same as when the goats run out of grass. They over-grazed, and over-reproduced, and a backlash occurs as a result.

Your attempt to condemn anything humans do as unnatural is simply in error.


Any species WOULD do this.

But humans are the only species that CAN and ARE doing it.


Which is why it's not playing god, or being unnatural, but simply being successful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OnTheOtherSide wrote:
visitorq wrote:
OnTheOtherSide wrote:
I am not going to argue this. I've spoken my piece. Time will be the judge. There is nothing we have right now that can save us from the threat we pose to ourselves. But there are new diseases being created right now that will one day be unleashed on the public.....

Is your name John Holdren? Do you know something we don't?

I suppose your solution will be to give lethal, brain damaging, and totally useless vaccines to our women and children...


There's nothing pretty about killing lots of people to save the world.

But. Ya gotta do what ya gotta do Wink

The only other option is to let things keep going as they are. Until the Earth is so messed up and depleted of resources that it can only support a billion people anyway.

Either way. Big time death is coming.

Please, go kill yourself first. Lead by example. And take John Holdren, Paul Ehrlich, the Rockefellers, and the rest of them with you. I believe that in itself will make the world a better place. And if not, no skin off your back (you're already dead)...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OnTheOtherSide



Joined: 29 Feb 2008

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

visitorq wrote:
OnTheOtherSide wrote:
visitorq wrote:
OnTheOtherSide wrote:
I am not going to argue this. I've spoken my piece. Time will be the judge. There is nothing we have right now that can save us from the threat we pose to ourselves. But there are new diseases being created right now that will one day be unleashed on the public.....

Is your name John Holdren? Do you know something we don't?

I suppose your solution will be to give lethal, brain damaging, and totally useless vaccines to our women and children...


There's nothing pretty about killing lots of people to save the world.

But. Ya gotta do what ya gotta do Wink

The only other option is to let things keep going as they are. Until the Earth is so messed up and depleted of resources that it can only support a billion people anyway.

Either way. Big time death is coming.

Please, go kill yourself first. Lead by example. And take John Holdren, Paul Ehrlich, the Rockefellers, and the rest of them with you. I believe that in itself will make the world a better place. And if not, no skin of your back (you're already dead)...


No thanks. I will TRY to be one of the survivors. But if I get killed, no hard feelings.

Many cows, pigs, chickens and plants have died to keep me alive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
visitorq



Joined: 11 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OnTheOtherSide wrote:
visitorq wrote:
OnTheOtherSide wrote:
visitorq wrote:
OnTheOtherSide wrote:
I am not going to argue this. I've spoken my piece. Time will be the judge. There is nothing we have right now that can save us from the threat we pose to ourselves. But there are new diseases being created right now that will one day be unleashed on the public.....

Is your name John Holdren? Do you know something we don't?

I suppose your solution will be to give lethal, brain damaging, and totally useless vaccines to our women and children...


There's nothing pretty about killing lots of people to save the world.

But. Ya gotta do what ya gotta do Wink

The only other option is to let things keep going as they are. Until the Earth is so messed up and depleted of resources that it can only support a billion people anyway.

Either way. Big time death is coming.

Please, go kill yourself first. Lead by example. And take John Holdren, Paul Ehrlich, the Rockefellers, and the rest of them with you. I believe that in itself will make the world a better place. And if not, no skin of your back (you're already dead)...


No thanks. I will TRY to be one of the survivors. But if I get killed, no hard feelings.

Hypocrisy at its finest. Truly shameless.
Back to top