|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Hamlet
Joined: 18 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:46 pm Post subject: Another Grammar Question |
|
|
I think both are correct.
My coworker says only number 2 is correct.
What do you think...
1. the benefits of having young people doing community service
2. the benefits of having young people do community service |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
edwardcatflap
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
this seems to me like the difference between
I watched them play football and
I watched them playing football.
They are both correct but the first one suggests the speaker watched the whole game while the second suggests the action of watching wasn't completed.
similarly the benfits of having young people do community service suggests the benefits are seen once the action is completed whereas the benefits of having people doing community service suggests the benefits can be seen during the acitivity |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gibberish
Joined: 29 Aug 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let me try to use some examples that work. A principal looks at his students cleaning up a park:
1. ""These are the benefits of having young people doing community service, the park gets clean.
2. "The benefits of having young people do community service is that it gets them outside and working."
So yeah, edward is right, the first one hints at an uncompleted action and the second is more of a generality. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ucbhanna
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
What about this one?
1) There is a variety of colors.
2) There are a variety of colors. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Epicurus
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
ucbhanna wrote: |
What about this one?
1) There is a variety of colors.
2) There are a variety of colors. |
I would have gone with both are correct in the first set agreeing with the others about implication of the phrasing.
this example on the other hand, I suspect an American/Canadian and a Briton will give you two different answers.
Personally I try to avoid using "to be" in such constructs.. and I find a different verb, otherwise you run into such stupid vagaries and this is a good example of it. I would avoid to be and switch to "have"
but sticking with to be
I would've said for e.g.
1) there is a wide variety of colors available - North American will be more likely to say this
2) there are wide a wide variety of colors available - Brit will be more likely to say this
then of course, you'll have a Brit saying - England have won, while a North American will say...
WHAAAAT?
Americans will stick to their perception of a noun being singular even if it implies a plurality. (e.g. - variety.. eg. England)
Brits will go plural which sounds horrid to North American ears.
God I hate grammar
just glad I've always read a lot so innately recognize which form is the more often used or correct one.
Last edited by Epicurus on Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Epicurus
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
for the North American to use "are" in the construct.
we'd have to eliminate the "a", which implies/confirms the singularity of the word "variety".
erg
there are many varietieS of colors to choose from.
Brits (dunno about Aussies, Kiwis, SA's etc) don't stick to this logical approach, they use a different logic (which is retarded to NA's) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Reise-ohne-Ende
Joined: 07 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
1. the benefits of having young people doing community service
2. the benefits of having young people do community service |
I kind of agree with the other posters about this, but I think a clarification is in order. It seems to me that, in the first sentence, "doing" is an adjectival participle (? I don't know what this grammar term is officially called in English.) that modifies "young people". So the benefit is to someone else.
"The benefit of having [young people doing community service] is that it makes it easier on state employees."
Whereas in the second sentence, to me, implies that the benefit is more to the young people. It's almost like an embedded clause - "young people" is the subject and "do" is the predicate verb.
"The benefit of having [young people] [do community service] is that they learn responsibility."
(Notice that I made 'benefits' singular; to use the plural form, you'd have to list more than one benefit.)
It's a very subtle distinction, though, and you could switch structures without anyone really noticing.
Quote: |
1) There is a variety of colors.
2) There are a variety of colors. |
In formal American English, it's absolutely the first one, because "variety" is a singular collective noun. I'm not 100% sure about what Britons would find correct, but I suspect it's the second one, because they don't really have the conception of "singular collective" in their dialect. I suspect it's similar with Aussies and Kiwis. I don't know about Canadians.
In addition, many American speakers would say #2 colloquially (I'd argue that most of them would), but if you asked them on paper what they would say, they'd almost always choose #1. It's a question of formality, and everyone likes to think that they speak the "right" way.
My recommendation would be to promote #1. It's much easier (and safer, for job/educational prospects) to teach someone formal language and have them pick up colloquialisms rather than the other way around.
ETA: Don't you love how 'they' is becoming a singular gender-neutral third person pronoun?? Imagine if I'd said "Everyone likes to think that he speaks the right way." Gross, right? And for some reason, that's the prestigious form. Oh, English. Whatever will I do with you? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ucbhanna
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
On that note, I'll throw one more out there:
1) There is a couple of ways to do this.
2) There are a couple of ways to do this.
Would that same rule apply here?
[/b] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Reise-ohne-Ende
Joined: 07 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On that note, I'll throw one more out there:
1) There is a couple of ways to do this.
2) There are a couple of ways to do this.
Would that same rule apply here? |
Ooooh...nice one. As an American English speaker, I would accept both colloquially without thought. I hear them used interchangeably. My best guess is that the first one is correct in formal AmEng, because 'couple' is a singular collective noun. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seonsengnimble
Joined: 02 Jun 2009 Location: taking a ride on the magic English bus
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Reise-ohne-Ende wrote: |
Quote: |
On that note, I'll throw one more out there:
1) There is a couple of ways to do this.
2) There are a couple of ways to do this.
Would that same rule apply here? |
Ooooh...nice one. As an American English speaker, I would accept both colloquially without thought. I hear them used interchangeably. My best guess is that the first one is correct in formal AmEng, because 'couple' is a singular collective noun. |
As an American speaker of English, I'd disagree with you on this one. In the term, couple, there is an implied number regardless of the fact that it is a singular collective noun. There are two ways to do this/There are a couple of ways to do this. This is the same as with few. "There is a few people" sounds insane.
There is of course the singular couple which refers to two people dating, but that's a whole other issue.
My guess would be that variety is a bit different in that although it is a collective noun, it doesn't really have a quantifying quality to it. The word implies more that there are different choices rather than there are two or three or four choices.
with variety, I'd go with either is or are. I think there is a slight difference in the focus of the word variety when you use is or are. In the sentence "There are a variety of colors," the focus is on the colors. In this usage, the you are saying there are many colors to choose from. In "there is a variety of colors," the focus is more on the variety. There are many differences between the colors rather than there are many colors.
Essentially, these two ways of stating it mean the same thing, but when you say are, you are emphasizing the quantity of colors rather than the fact that they are different. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
janydc
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
The correct sentence would be " There are a couple of ways to do this".
Despite "couple" being a collective noun, it is referring to more than one action, hence the plural "are" is the right verb form to use.
Think of it as "There is two ways to do this" versus " There are two ways to do this". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Reise-ohne-Ende
Joined: 07 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mmm, I'm gonna have to beg to differ, janydc
It just depends on where you live and what register you're speaking
If you read:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/couple
I think the general consensus is that "a couple", when referring to two people, tends to take the plural verb. When "couple" refers to a pair of something, it can take either verb, though the plural form may be more common (note that commonality does not imply formality - actually, the opposite is usually true). Personally, I would never say "The couple are going to the party"; I would say "The couple's going to the party." And since I'm a native speaker, it means that construction is descriptively valid. Whether it is formal or not is up for debate, but prescriptivism is essentially meaningless anyway, and the jury is clearly still out on the issue.
Regardless, the reason "There are two ways to do this" is correct is because here 'ways' is the subject, not 'two', and 'ways' is clearly plural. In the original sentence, 'ways' is the object of a preposition, which can never be the subject.
Anyway, 'a couple of' is not a very formal construction to begin with, so I wouldn't worry too much about the verb choice.
ETA: Colloquially, I would also likely say, "There's two ways to do this," although I probably wouldn't in formal speech, and I certainly wouldn't in formal writing. FWIW. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Epicurus
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ucbhanna wrote: |
On that note, I'll throw one more out there:
1) There is a couple of ways to do this.
2) There are a couple of ways to do this.
Would that same rule apply here?
[/b] |
absolutely not.
the noun in question here is "ways" which is plural.
Hence only the 2nd option can be correct
both Brits and Americans would go with 2. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Reise-ohne-Ende
Joined: 07 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
the noun in question here is "ways" which is plural. |
I don't know where you learned syntax, but the object of a preposition is never going to be the subject of the main predicate verb of a sentence.
The only debatable issue is whether or not 'couple' is a collective singular. ETA: I suppose you could also argue that 'a couple of' is an adjectival phrase. That is really stretching it.
Of course, you may be right that every English speaker in the world uses the form you consider to be correct. It's not like people dedicate their lives to studying language variation or anything.
If anyone would like to discuss this issue further they can PM me, because I'm not going to keep hijacking this thread. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Epicurus
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Reise-ohne-Ende wrote: |
Quote: |
the noun in question here is "ways" which is plural. |
I don't know where you learned syntax, but the object of a preposition is never going to be the subject of the main predicate verb of a sentence.
The only debatable issue is whether or not 'couple' is a collective singular. ETA: I suppose you could also argue that 'a couple of' is an adjectival phrase. That is really stretching it.
Of course, you may be right that every English speaker in the world uses the form you consider to be correct. It's not like people dedicate their lives to studying language variation or anything.
If anyone would like to discuss this issue further they can PM me, because I'm not going to keep hijacking this thread. Thanks. |
unfortunately, I have no idea of what syntax, predicate, object of preposition, etc etc I have no idea what any of that mumbo jumbo means.
What I do know is what my brain tells me is correct, simply based on a lifetime of fairly intense reading and listening to educated English.
And my brain tells me there isn't even a hint of a doubt as to whether 1 is incorrect and 2 correct.
I'm not interested in "language variation". I'll leave that for interested parties such as yourself to explore. I'm merely interested in the written and spoken form which marks me as an educated erudite man/person etc etc.
let's substitute a different word, leaving the sentence's meaning exactly as before. Use "several" instead of "couple".
There IS several ways of doing this
There ARE several ways of doing this
I'd say the answer is rather OBVIOUS, wouldn't you?
I suppose grammar geeks will confirm then that "couple of " is not a collective singular, eh?
as in
we will paint a couple of car tomorrow
OR
we will paint a couple of carS tomorrow.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|