View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MarketFresh
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:43 pm Post subject: Rural??? |
|
|
hi, wondering what number makes a town rural....
i'm assuming a 'town' of 60 000 wouldn't be considered rural?
i'm wondering whether going rural would be for me...i'm from a big city and wouldn't mind relocating to a smaller town...i know for epik you get an extra allowance for going rural but what exactly is rural...epik does not answer questions... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tall_dave

Joined: 02 Nov 2009 Location: Songtan, S. Korea
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:54 pm Post subject: Re: Rural??? |
|
|
MarketFresh wrote: |
hi, wondering what number makes a town rural....
i'm assuming a 'town' of 60 000 wouldn't be considered rural?
i'm wondering whether going rural would be for me...i'm from a big city and wouldn't mind relocating to a smaller town...i know for epik you get an extra allowance for going rural but what exactly is rural...epik does not answer questions... |
Rural is actually meant to say OUTSIDE of the city. Some people might use this to say they are living in the counrty, but that does not necessarily make it rural. Small farming communities are usually considered rural. The number 60,000 really doesn't mean anything in this contect. That would actually be a number of a relatively large town. Rural, can be a farming community of several or several dozen families, and bigger. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's useful to have labels, and urban or rural seem to be concise and good enough. You could call things in terms of suburb, outskirts, newly developed cities, but at first crack, it's either urban or rural. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tall_dave

Joined: 02 Nov 2009 Location: Songtan, S. Korea
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lifeinkorea wrote: |
It's useful to have labels, and urban or rural seem to be concise and good enough. You could call things in terms of suburb, outskirts, newly developed cities, but at first crack, it's either urban or rural. |
Urban - In the city
Rural - Out of the city |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Once you leave Seoul, Gyeonggi and the major metropolitan cities, you'll have cities and counties ranging in population from 20,000 to 700,000.
Most places will be either called a city (shi) or county (gun). These areas usually range from 50 sq/miles - 500 sq/miles.
For most areas, if it has under 100,000 people it's considered rural and called a gun (county). These counties will have usually have 1, or 2, large towns (usually centrally located) with populations from 20,000 to 100,000+, which will still be considered rural even though they are pretty urban in character. And there will be a lot of smaller villages and smaller towns in the rest of the county with really small populations, which would be very very very rural and would be hard to see a westerner living in these places.
Some cities may have under 100,000, but that's because they lost population after being designated a city.
Hope this helps clearing up your understanding of how they organize things here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tall_dave wrote: |
lifeinkorea wrote: |
It's useful to have labels, and urban or rural seem to be concise and good enough. You could call things in terms of suburb, outskirts, newly developed cities, but at first crack, it's either urban or rural. |
Urban - In the city
Rural - Out of the city |
100%, very good  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SanchoPanza
Joined: 10 Jan 2010 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:24 pm Post subject: Re: Rural??? |
|
|
tall_dave wrote: |
Rural is actually meant to say OUTSIDE of the city. Some people might use this to say they are living in the counrty, but that does not necessarily make it rural. Small farming communities are usually considered rural. The number 60,000 really doesn't mean anything in this contect. That would actually be a number of a relatively large town. Rural, can be a farming community of several or several dozen families, and bigger. |
Absolutely wrong.
Rural and urban have different meanings depending on how a country
organizes and quantifies itself.
Korea has the following:
Urban population was defined in the national census as being
restricted to those municipalities with 50,000 or more inhabitants.
Source: http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-12271.html
Other countries have different definitions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What a splitting hair debate. I don't think you will find one answer to this if you are wondering where the line in the sand is drawn between rural and urban. It doesn't matter because Korea is so small anyway. It has more of a "country" (farm) feel, but it functions more like a unified city. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MarketFresh
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:37 pm Post subject: rural? |
|
|
rural means outside of the city? well then isn't that most of korea except seoul...lol
just wondering if anyone here is actually working in a rural area and gets their extra allowance for working there...
got a few offers in places like uljin which seems rural to me but it still ain't classified as rural...so just wondering what the hell is rural and what's there aside from rice fields |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crisdean
Joined: 04 Feb 2010 Location: Seoul Special City
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My First year I got rural pay working in Gimpo (Masong-ni). They call Gimpo a city, but it's more like a county of several towns and villages. Some clusters were considered urban (i.e. no rural pay) and the rest was rural. I imagine several of the "cities" in Gyeonggi are similar.
The rural distinction seems quite arbitrary in Korea, when I was in Gimpo I had a pair of friends who worked just down the street from one another and one got rural pay and the other didn't, because that was where the line was drawn by the office of education. So potentially you could get a rural allowence in an area that isn't really rural, or vice-versa.
As for whether or not working in a rural area is a good idea, that's hard to answer, I liked certain aspects of it, disliked others. And I had the benefit of not actually living in the area I was working, I lived in one of the more urban areas of Gimpo, though that meant I had a 40 minute commute to work everyday, it was better for grocery shopping and meeting people. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MarketFresh
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 8:29 pm Post subject: rural |
|
|
thanks man...damn, i would of never thought of gimpo as rural...but i guess it's up to the office of education.
what was the foreign community like there? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|