Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Nuke it
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Nuke it?
Yes
35%
 35%  [ 7 ]
No
65%
 65%  [ 13 ]
Total Votes : 20

Author Message
The Happy Warrior



Joined: 10 Feb 2010

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:46 am    Post subject: Nuke it Reply with quote

Nuke the oil spill

Only a 20% chance of failure (based on previous attempts)

With a potential for some radioactive contamination
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matthew R. Simmons was interviewed on the Financial Sense Newshour about the spill. He calls it the greatest ecological catastrophe in human history. He isn't one for hyperbole, though he might be talking his alt-energy book.

He argues that there is another, much larger leak a short distance from the one we're hearing about:

http://www.financialsense.com/fsn/main.php
(scroll down to see MRS's interview - it is quite informative)

Ok, the OP's question. Simmons argues that the bomb option is possible. Apparently the Russians have done it.

If it will close it, do it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fox



Joined: 04 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My first thought was, "Why not try with conventional explosives instead?" The author suggests this that at the end of his article. I'd rather that possibility were fully considered by experts before turning to a nuclear weapon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moosehead



Joined: 05 May 2007

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nuclear Option on Gulf Oil Spill? No Way, U.S. Says

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/03/us/03nuke.html?hp
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Corea



Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really don't think that mixing nuclear waste with crude oil would be a good idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.38 Special



Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you people seriously considering this? Laughing Laughing Laughing

Somehow I don't think busting out the Enola Gay is the environmental solution of choice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kotakji



Joined: 23 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

While its generally a good thing that nuclear weapons have a strong stigma attached to them, it does result in the general populace thinking that the radiation effects of a nuke are far more terrible than in reality. The vast majority of dangerous radiation exposure comes from immediate burst exposure. Besides for the plan to work, I believe the nuke has to be buried underneath the seabed.

The real problem with a nuclear solution that I've heard is that there is a chance (perhaps small) that it might just crack the whole thing open and make it worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.38 Special



Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nuclear gamma rays + oil = sludge monster.

The following scenario has been prepared by top national security security analysts.

Following the unsuccessful use of a nuclear charge to seal the oil, a sludge monster has been causing havoc among crews attempting to seal the well. For nearly two weeks crews have been unable to approach the well for fear being attacked.

Desperate, the National Geological Society has hired the expertise of Mystery Inc. to discover the source of and banish the monster. A specially outfitted ship was sent to the site of the leaking well for the expedition.

Utilizing various tactical shenanigans, retro seventies music themed chase scenes through various doors throughout the decks, and at least one absurdly large sandwich, the gang was able to capture the nuclear sludge monster.

The creature was realized to be a hoax! Indeed, it was a man in a suit! And it was none other than Tony Hayward, CEO of BP.

Taken into custody by federal agents, Hayward was quoted as saying, "I'd have gotten away with it, too, were it not for those meddling kids and their stupid dog!"

Shocked

Story time is over now. Shoo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moosehead



Joined: 05 May 2007

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

we're all doomed, face it Shocked Crying or Very sad Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pkang0202



Joined: 09 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nuke it.

Just don't eat any of the dead fish that float to the surface.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Koveras



Joined: 09 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You'll be hardpressed to convince anyone that radiation won't enter the food chain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Koveras wrote:
You'll be hardpressed to convince anyone that radiation won't enter the food chain.


Simmons suggests a bomb. Not necessarily a nuke.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kinerry



Joined: 01 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The only surefire solution is relief drilling, which is very likely going to be the end result.

This is what happened the last time...this happened in 1979
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHmhxpQEGPo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Captain Corea



Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

.38 Special wrote:
Nuclear gamma rays + oil = sludge monster.


Don't make me put on my CC tights.


Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jandar



Joined: 11 Jun 2008

PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nuke the Whales!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International