View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 12:20 pm Post subject: Legalisation of documents - shocking loopholes UK! |
|
|
I just had my degree certificate and background check notarised by a lawyer and then 'legalised' by the FCO in Milton Keynes. The total cost of this was 80 pounds, which is shocking enough for something which takes only one minute, but there is a much greater flaw in this process than I ever imagined; namely that you could easily take a FAKE degree certificate to the solicitor and the FCO and get it notarised and legalised as there is absolutely no mechanism in place which allows them to ascertain whether it is bona fide or not!
The FCO conceded that they couldn't verify a document's authenticity, but argued that this was not the purpose of the Treaty. Well, I think someone needs to let the Korean immigration authorities know because as fellow members of the Hague Convention they certainly believe that authentication is an integral part of the process - hence the rule change! Obviously, this is just a licensed racket which needs bringing down.
The FCO bigwig, when challenged, even argued that the main purpose of the whole process was to establish that the name of the university on the degree was an accredited institute of higher learning in the UK. Well, someone better tell the cats on Kai-san road to make sure that their fake masterpieces simply refer to a bona fide university;not exactly a taxing matter! Anyhow, I will be pursuing this further because it is a disgrace considering the cost. It serves absolutely no function or purpose whatsoever except to line the pockets of the greedy solicitor and subsidise the plum jobs in the ivory towers at the FCO.
Last edited by Gwangjuboy on Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:37 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve_Rogers2008
Joined: 22 Mar 2010
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paragraphs and the return key are your friend!
Or are they?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steve_Rogers2008 wrote: |
paragraphs and the return key are your friend!
Or are they?  |
Fair point! It was one of those messy efforts where you get through the door and start furiously banging the keys  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After reading more it appears that the FCO's remit is merely to authenticate that the solicitor's signature is genuine - presumably this is next to impossible to do anyway if you faked that too.
So my understanding now is that an apostille authenticates that the signature of a solicitor - who is in no position to verify whether the degree is real or not - is genuine. What's the point? You could conceivably take a fake degree certificate with a fake solicitor's signature and stamp and get an apostille! What a flawed system, and for 80 pounds too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ramen
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is why I recommend the Thailand route. You could meet all your document needs while taking a wonderful vacation and everything is cheaper there.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
verloc
Joined: 24 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Notaries check by phoning your university to see if the information on your certificate is correct. The FCO then check that the notary is licensed.
I know this because I was working at the university I graduated from, and the registrar emailed me to say that she had just spoken to a solicitor confirming my details.
Maybe my case was different as the notary kept my certificate for a couple of days and didn't authenticate immediately. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
back to gimchiland after all these years gwangjuboy?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Otherside
Joined: 06 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
verloc wrote: |
Notaries check by phoning your university to see if the information on your certificate is correct. The FCO then check that the notary is licensed.
|
Not necessarily the case.
I got my degree verified/apostilled in South Africa. I had to get a letter from the Department of Education, before the Department of Foreign Affairs would apostille it. The department of Education representative, didn't even ask to look at the original, just the copy, and printed off a letter there and then without even a phone call to the University.
In a nutshell, I got a letter saying my University (not the degree, or my graduation) was legitimate, and then I got the copy of my degree Apostilled based on the letter. At no point in my ordeal was the original degree actually required, nor was any fact checking done. I'm 90% sure I could have passed a photoshopped degree of without a hitch. My experience mirrors that of the OP, only difference being this was in SA rather than the UK. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
verloc
Joined: 24 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I'm sure it does happen like that, but in my case it was actually verified.
Still, I'm not sure it's wise to complain about it. If such an appeal is taken seriously the most likely result will be the introduction of more time consuming bureaucracy and cost, not less. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
laguna
Joined: 27 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 7:29 pm Post subject: Re: Legalisation of documents - shocking loopholes UK! |
|
|
Gwangjuboy wrote: |
I just had my degree certificate and background check notarised by a lawyer and then 'legalised' by the FCO in Milton Keynes. The total cost of this was 80 pounds, which is shocking enough for something which takes only one minute, but there is a much greater flaw in this process than I ever imagined; namely that you could easily take a FAKE degree certificate to the solicitor and the FCO and get it notarised and legalised as there is absolutely no mechanism in place which allows them to ascertain whether it is bona fide or not!
The FCO conceded that they couldn't verify a document's authenticity, but argued that this was not the purpose of the Treaty. Well, I think someone needs to let the Korean immigration authorities know because as fellow members of the Hague Convention they certainly believe that authentication is an integral part of the process - hence the rule change! Obviously, this is just a licensed racket which needs bringing down.
The FCO bigwig, when challenged, even argued that the main purpose of the whole process was to establish that the name of the university on the degree was an accredited institute of higher learning in the UK. Well, someone better tell the cats on Kai-san road to make sure that their fake masterpieces simply refer to a bona fide university;not exactly a taxing matter! Anyhow, I will be pursuing this further because it is a disgrace considering the cost. It serves absolutely no function or purpose whatsoever except to line the pockets of the greedy solicitor and subsidise the plum jobs in the ivory towers at the FCO. |
The point of a notary is not to certify a document is legit, it's to get you to go under oath claiming it is. If you lie, you can get ultra fun felony prison time for lying later. There is no way for them to certify every document handed to them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:08 am Post subject: Re: Legalisation of documents - shocking loopholes UK! |
|
|
laguna wrote: |
The point of a notary is not to certify a document is legit, it's to get you to go under oath claiming it is. If you lie, you can get ultra fun felony prison time for lying later. There is no way for them to certify every document handed to them. |
I didn't go under oath when the solicitor notarised my document and neither did I have to sign any statement. Even if the mere handing over of the document constitutes 'going under oath' the process serves no purpose other than making what is already a very serious crime in the UK - using fake degree certificates to get a job - worse.
I would venture to suggest that if you were of such a character that you would use fake certificates to get a job anyway then in most cases the notarisation process would not deter you. Afterall, obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception is an indictable offence anyway (our equivilent to a felony in the US). As members of the Hague Convention the Korean authorities seem to have deluded themselves into believing that this process will weed out those with fake certifcates; clearly that isn't the case.
BTW, wiki suggests that part of a UK notary's remit is to authenticate the contents of a document.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notary_public#United_Kingdom
Last edited by Gwangjuboy on Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:22 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
verloc wrote: |
Notaries check by phoning your university to see if the information on your certificate is correct. The FCO then check that the notary is licensed.
I know this because I was working at the university I graduated from, and the registrar emailed me to say that she had just spoken to a solicitor confirming my details.
Maybe my case was different as the notary kept my certificate for a couple of days and didn't authenticate immediately. |
In the UK it appears that there is no mechanism in place which would allow the solicitor to verify anything - and this solicitor didn't even attempt to check anything anyway. Indeed, don't data protection laws mean that universities are prohibited from giving information over the phone on current or previous alumni? I would imagine that a police investigation is the only exception to this but then again, the police would presumably have to visit the university in person and produce ID and relevant warrant. Surely anyone then could call a university and claim they are a solicitor. Bottom line: if you used the solicitor I saw you could take a fake degree certificate - or even phd - have him sign and stamp the document, and then have it apostilled at the FCO. The whole process would take no longer than a few minutes, then you would be good for employment in Korea. It is a major loophole, and evidently the Korean Justice Ministry thinks there is a lot more verification involved than actually is.
Last edited by Gwangjuboy on Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:41 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Oliver

Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:28 am Post subject: Re: Legalisation of documents - shocking loopholes UK! |
|
|
Gwangjuboy wrote: |
but there is a much greater flaw in this process than I ever imagined; namely that you could easily take a FAKE degree certificate to the solicitor and the FCO and get it notarised and legalised |
It's true, the system is flawed. I raised this concern in another thread recently. If the notary does not check with the University that your degree is genuine then fake degrees can be legalized.
Now, the British Council do perform a service where they actually check with your University that your degree is real. They then stamp a copy of your degree which the FCO will then legalize. The British Council in Korea perform this service. I mentioned this in other threads too.
Best,
Ollie |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Oliver

Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
The FCO actually state the following on their website.
'Legalisation does not certify the authenticity of a document or give Foreign and Commonwealth Office approval of its content.' They also note that 'Legalisation is the official confirmation that a signature, seal or stamp on a UK public document is genuine'.
Source - http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-us/what-we-do/services-we-deliver/legal-services/legalisation/
Korean immigration may or may not know these things. It doesn't change what we still need to get done - notarization and apostille.
Last edited by Oliver on Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:49 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I noted that above. So the question is; who is actually responsible for carrying out any verification, ostensibly at least? If the notarisation process constitutes nothing more than an oath - although I never took an oath or made any statement in front of witnesses etc - the whole system is just nuts. Clearly, the Korean authorities don't understand that no verification actually takes place. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|