Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Question regarding the new immigration laws.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mssinmymind



Joined: 12 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:26 pm    Post subject: Question regarding the new immigration laws. Reply with quote

According to another website: "Background checks are required by Korean immigration and (new requirement!) starting Jan. 1, 2011, an FBI check is required if you are American. You will need to get an Apostille for your criminal background check (unless you�re Canadian). See apostilleinfo.com for details. Canadian teachers must get a verification stamp from the Korean consulate in their jurisdiction.

It also states: Passport Photos: Six official colored passport photos will be required in total. THREE photos will be sent to Korean Immigration, ONE will be sent to the Korean consulate and TWO will be required for your health examination in Korea. All photos should be the same shot so just head to your nearest passport photo taker and order about 10 of them. (You can also use these for traveling to other countries from Korea that require visas."

Sorry but I'm a bit confused. This states "Canadians must get a verification stamp from the Korean consulate in their jurisdiction" and also states "THREE photos will be sent to Korean Immigration, ONE will be sent to the Korean consulate"

If I am American, does this mean I no longer need to visit the Korean Embassy just send in the info ? Or am I totally misunderstanding ?

Sorry to be so naive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are also, for some mystical reason, demanding criminal record checks for a mere renewal of an E-2 as of January, 2011, in case you, y'know, somehow remotely commit a crime in your home country while you're here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
HalfJapanese



Joined: 02 Feb 2010

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's the deal with the more increased/restricted criminal background checks? It's obvious that they want to keep out as many foreigners as possible.

[quote=Underwaterbob]They are also, for some mystical reason, demanding criminal record checks for a mere renewal of an E-2 as of January, 2011, in case you, y'know, somehow remotely commit a crime in your home country while you're here.[/quote]

They probably want to get the foreigners out as quickly as possible once they come in and stay.


It's the tactic of indirectly implementing an agenda that would not be accepted by the masses by if apply directly, so they use what seems to be unrelated policies, regulations, etc to achieve the hidden agenda.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fugitive chicken



Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Location: Bucheon

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HalfJapanese wrote:
What's the deal with the more increased/restricted criminal background checks? It's obvious that they want to keep out as many foreigners as possible.

[quote=Underwaterbob]They are also, for some mystical reason, demanding criminal record checks for a mere renewal of an E-2 as of January, 2011, in case you, y'know, somehow remotely commit a crime in your home country while you're here.

They probably want to get the foreigners out as quickly as possible once they come in and stay.


It's the tactic of indirectly implementing an agenda that would not be accepted by the masses by if apply directly, so they use what seems to be unrelated policies, regulations, etc to achieve the hidden agenda.



+1

I've heard rumors over the past 2 years that the government wants to remove NETs from PSs by 2012 and have trained KTs fully take over that job. I haven't seen or read anything to confirm this. But the steps they are taking here seem to me that they are looking in that direction.
Quote:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crossmr



Joined: 22 Nov 2008
Location: Hwayangdong, Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
+1

I've heard rumors over the past 2 years that the government wants to remove NETs from PSs by 2012 and have trained KTs fully take over that job. I haven't seen or read anything to confirm this. But the steps they are taking here seem to me that they are looking in that direction.

That rumour has been around for 100 years. and I'm not even kidding.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tombanjo



Joined: 23 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm planning to renew my current PS contract for next year and was told today by the Office of Education that I will NOT need an FBI check/apostile or the notarized and apostiled degree for renewing. They say that it is only necessary for people switching jobs and entering as new teachers.


Sounds too good to be true.


Of course I'm skeptical about this, though they seemed pretty certain. Anyone heard any similar info?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bibbitybop



Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the past, immigration policy changes have left everyone, including immigration officials, running around like headless chickens. When CBCs were required the first time, the immigration office even told Americans to get a CBC from the American Embassy despite the Embassy repeated telling immigration and all Americans that the Embassy does not produce CBCs.

When drug tests were required, immigration was quick to drop the cannabinoids test after complications.

The point is that until Jan. 1, no one knows what immigration will really allow or require, not even immigration itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bibbitybop wrote:
In the past, immigration policy changes have left everyone, including immigration officials, running around like headless chickens. When CBCs were required the first time, the immigration office even told Americans to get a CBC from the American Embassy despite the Embassy repeated telling immigration and all Americans that the Embassy does not produce CBCs.

When drug tests were required, immigration was quick to drop the cannabinoids test after complications.

The point is that until Jan. 1, no one knows what immigration will really allow or require, not even immigration itself.



This^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International