View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
oldsurly
Joined: 05 Nov 2009
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just from the looks, and not knowing anything about the watches, I like #3. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldsurly
Joined: 05 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Honestly, I am also leaning toward #3. Although it's still a hard decision. Cheers for the input. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Italy37612
Joined: 25 Jan 2010 Location: Somewhere
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also, not knowing anything about watches, I like #3 the most. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kprrok
Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Location: KC
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you actually held each watch in your hand and tried it on? How did they feel? Too heavy? Too light? Too big? Too small?
Watches really need to be seen before bought. If you haven't seen them, don't even consider buying it. If you have seen it, you should know which is the best.
To answer your question, I wouldn't buy any of those. I'm partial to Omega and Tags, but those are just too busy. They kind of look cheap to me. I love my Tissot Le Locle because it's classic and simple. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldsurly
Joined: 05 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kprrok, to answer your question, yes I have, hence the problem, they are all very similar in design and weight (well at least to me). I own two newer Tissots the PR50 and the PRC200 as well as some older classic watches. All great watches in their own right. I do understand how you can say that they are too busy, but I think that is the reason why I like them. I appreciate the Input.
Cheers,
Oldsurly |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Globutron
Joined: 13 Feb 2010 Location: England/Anyang
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They look cheap to me, from another person who doesn't know anything about them.
Number 2 is my preferred one because it's less busy and the strap is more likely to fit my oddly shaped wrist without catching hairs all the time like loose metal straps tend to do. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
IlIlNine
Joined: 15 Jun 2005 Location: Gunpo, Gyonggi, SoKo
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd take the Longines. Tag is way overrated for the price, and Omega's just an expensive Swatch.
But honestly, I'm a bit of a watch buff and I don't like any of those either. It's about the most ripped-off watch style in history. If you want that kind of style, I'd just get the Rolex Submariner in stainless (because it's basically the style that these watches rip-off anyways... )
There are so many other watches that look much more distinctive - and, were it may laying down that kind of coin on a watch, I'd really want something that stands out.
Just the fact that you can't decide between the three here is telling.
Anyways, it's always a personal choice - good luck with your purchase! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldsurly
Joined: 05 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IlIlNine wrote: |
I'd take the Longines. Tag is way overrated for the price, and Omega's just an expensive Swatch.
But honestly, I'm a bit of a watch buff and I don't like any of those either. It's about the most ripped-off watch style in history. If you want that kind of style, I'd just get the Rolex Submariner in stainless (because it's basically the style that these watches rip-off anyways... )
There are so many other watches that look much more distinctive - and, were it may laying down that kind of coin on a watch, I'd really want something that stands out.
Just the fact that you can't decide between the three here is telling.
Anyways, it's always a personal choice - good luck with your purchase! |
You are absolutely right and I couldn't agree with you more. I love that style of watch and if I could realistically spend the money on the Submariner I would. Unfortunately, It's not possible. I have looked into other brands as I said. For Example: Ball, DOXA, SEIKO, Tudor, ORIS, UTS and SINN, just to name a few. The ones I have listed appeal to me the most. A second thought, Tudor. I'm adding it to my list.
Cheers,
Oldsurly |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nathanrutledge
Joined: 01 May 2008 Location: Marakesh
|
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's the purpose of the watch? You have two chronographs and two standard watches. Personally, I have a Swatch Irony chronograph, but I like to fly airplanes and it comes in handy for just that very purpose (as well as other time/distance/fuel consumption activities). When I'm not using the chrono, I have a very simple Swiss Army watch.
Personally, I don't really like any of the watches, but I'm more of a leather strap kind of guy. The one without the metal straps came across as cheap looking to me as well.
Just my two cents. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SeoulFinn

Joined: 27 Feb 2006 Location: 1h from Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
From those I'd take #3.
OT:
I'd get this one for myself, if it was: a) of a better brand, and b) kept better time (accuracy).
Vostok-Europe Gaz Limousine 14 (white) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blackjack

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: anyang
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.watchzworld.com/seiko_coutura_sgeb76.html
This is what I have, given to me as a graduation gift 9 years ago.
I didn't like the gold finish at first but it really grew on me. i have worn it every day for 9 years and still not a scratch on the sapphire crystal and I live a very active life.
I don't like any of the ones you have posted the faces are all too busy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Globutron
Joined: 13 Feb 2010 Location: England/Anyang
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Even though I'm not a watch person, If there was any I'd consider wearing it would be this. Looks awesome. Looks comfortable too. The only problem is it looks too accurate. I think my time would go much slower looking at that... 'urrrrgh, only 1/16th of a minute has past since I last looked' |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SeoulFinn

Joined: 27 Feb 2006 Location: 1h from Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know exactly what you mean. V-E Gaz Limo 14 is one of the best looking watches I have ever seen, and it's affordable, too! Maybe I should just stop p*ssyfooting around and order it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Globutron
Joined: 13 Feb 2010 Location: England/Anyang
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
SeoulFinn wrote: |
I know exactly what you mean. V-E Gaz Limo 14 is one of the best looking watches I have ever seen, and it's affordable, too! Maybe I should just stop p*ssyfooting around and order it. |
One man's affordable is another man's house. �245! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|