|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tottenhamtaipeinick
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:17 pm Post subject: multicultural society works? Doesn't work? |
|
|
I am attending a conference directed at multiculturalism and how to bring a city together.... Any ideas???problems? good things?
I really want to hear experiences from people like westerners who may have lived in cities in the west and can compare it to the largely homogenous cities of the east (i.e. Cities in Korea, China, Taiwan etc) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll say multiculturalism doesn't really work anywhere. Any outside ethnic group, from a far off land, that enters a new country will eventually assimilate to the mainstream culture in a few generations. Key words is 'far off land'. Eventually the many Asians that have immigrated to North America in the last 50 years will be assimilated when their immigrations numbers drop off. A good example is the Japanese.
These days there is virtually no emigration from Japan, and the vast majority of Japanese-Americans are 2+ generations and virtually all marry outside their group. Other examples are the western Europeans that came in the first half of the 20th century Irish, Italians, Germans, etc... Immigration from those countries is minimal, most are 3, 4, 5, or more generation descendants and have essentially no connection to their ancestral countries except for their last names.
However, if the ethnic group is from a bordering country or a region that the country has taken over many many years ago, they become an invisible minority. Invisible minority being that on the surface they will look and act the same as the majority, but in private may retain elements of their original culture over many many generations, and may never lose the originating culture, since their cultural source is just next door. Another question would be if the country would consider them part of their national culture since they may share many similarities and any differences wouldn't be considered different since the two countries have interacted with each other for years. Kind of like Southern China vs Northern China, Kyeongsang vs Seoul, or Canadians in the US. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First of all, I would say it is not a question of does it work or not work. It has to work in countries that allow immigration. And, it probably has to work in countries that want to participate in the global economy.
Economically, I think the U.S. and other multi-cultural nations have benefited. The U.S. has benefited from the diversity of skills, perspectives and desires (toward business objectives). The U.S. continues to benefit from being able to bring in both highly educated, highly skilled workers from abroad as well as low skill, cheap labor from abroad.
Multi-culturalism has brought tension and conflict and will probably continue to bring tension and conflict. I think multi-culturalism requires some governmental and educational vigilance.
But, I think some of this conflict is good as it pushes the boundries of understanding as well as create economic competition that motivates individuals in society. Social tension is not always bad.
Is multiculturalism perfect? No. But, I think as long as economics becomes more and more borderless, it is necessary and government, schools and businesses need to do what they have to do to prepare for it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
machoman

Joined: 11 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i typed out a long response but then felt like i lost my point somewhere so then deleted it all. but i'll sum up my point:
racism seems to be such a big problem still in america and because of different ethnic groups are pretty exclusive, it kind of creates this sort of apathetic attitude about everything. as if it's not "their" responsibility.
but for instance, in korea, there seems to be a big sense of pride in their country. there seems to be a sense of unity, something that i don't feel in the states. the only time i felt that was after 9/11.
this is coming from an asian-american perspective btw. i'm sure your answer would vary based on your ethnicity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PigeonFart
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Multiculturalism is fine, to an extent.
You foreigners can come to my country (Luxemburg) and dress in your funny clothes, speak your own languages, and bring your interesting food.
However, if you bring stone-age beliefs (Islam) then you are not welcome. So one's values are VERY important when it comes to being accepted in a host country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
redaxe
Joined: 01 Dec 2008
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are a lot of multicultural cities that work just fine (well, compared to every other dysfunctional excuse for a city on earth), but I think living in Korea for so long has made you guys think that it's not possible.
Try taking a trip to Singapore or Kuala Lumpur. Malays, Indians and Chinese have managed to coexist in a mostly functional, non-violent society for many years now.
And then note that most of Europe is practically one big democratic country now, whereas they used to wage war on each other constantly.
Actually a lot more examples are coming to mind now but I think I already got the point across. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
comm
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
machoman wrote: |
racism seems to be such a big problem still in america and because of different ethnic groups are pretty exclusive, it kind of creates this sort of apathetic attitude about everything. as if it's not "their" responsibility.
but for instance, in korea, there seems to be a big sense of pride in their country. there seems to be a sense of unity, something that i don't feel in the states. the only time i felt that was after 9/11. |
I hate to say it, but I think you're looking at two sides of the same coin here. It's easy to have national pride when the people around you are very similar to you (ethnicity, appearance, cultural beliefs, social norms, etc, etc). But in a country where these things are very different between citizens, there are few things we can rally around that make us "us", as opposed to everyone else. Hell, I think that the entire point of American style multiculturalism is that even if there is an "us" and "them", "they" can sign up to become part of "us". And where that's the case, what's there to be proud of in being "us", other than the fact that we're ok with "them" joining "us"?
I'd go so far as to say that all people are pretty much the same the world over... and by that I mean, there are likely as many racists in Korea as in the U.S. (per capita), it just doesn't hurt social harmony due to severe restrictions on immigration. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think in most countries in the world (outside North America) and in most times, multiculturalism has been the norm. We now have ever-more powerful states imposing uniformity, and it can be a problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
le-paul

Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Location: dans la chambre
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
i think the future for a muticultural society is people dominating specific areas according to their social group and eventually living side by side other social groups - trading for example but still living as seperate societies.
This is not a new concept, its been going on for 1000s of years and hasnt changed.
a common language is the way forward for example most people in rome spoke greek. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BaldTeacher
Joined: 02 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think that in a liberal democracy, it works on a limited scale. To make it work on a mass scale, you need a more repressive government like Singapore's.
Another thing- economic conservatism, globalisation and social liberalism are a horrible mix. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Skipperoo
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Depends how you define 'work'.
The UK is enormously multicultural and generally speaking it ticks along just fine, my own life has been enriched by multiculturalism hugely. It causes a lot of problems too of course which will always be the case when people with fundamentally different values live alongside one another.
So, yes and no, but mostly yes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Junior

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: the eye
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unposter wrote: |
Multi-culturalism has brought tension and conflict and will probably continue to bring tension and conflict. |
Mostly because of small-minded intolerance.
For the most part multiculturalism is a great thing in my view. Its hardly a new phenomenon, cultures have been mingling and interracting for millenia.
The vast majority of cultures across the world can successfully mix and compromise.
As far as I can see it is only (and solely) Islam that is proving to be the insoluble obstacle to the gradual re-unification of the human race. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AmericanBornKorean
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I personally found the nationalism of Korea unbearable and stupid. They are such a proud group of people despite being such a small nation. I remember this taxi driver was so surprised I had no idea what politics were going on in Korea. Why would I care?
I'm American, proud of it, and this is coming from a Korean who is nearly fluent in Korean. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
travel zen
Joined: 22 Feb 2005 Location: Good old Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I think multi-culturalism requires some governmental and educational vigilance.
|
This is key. Mashing people together without any guidance will only degenerate into 'me and mine' vs 'you and yours'.
Propaganda showing all cultures together holding hands, ethnic groups smiling and hugging, no singling out of any groups are a must for it to work. Schools, laws and workplace..along with police must be on board..or else it becomes ugly....
Canada had it back 10 years ago, but now its degenerating. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
comm
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Privateer wrote: |
I think in most countries in the world (outside North America) and in most times, multiculturalism has been the norm. We now have ever-more powerful states imposing uniformity, and it can be a problem. |
Have you read a history book, or turned on the news, ever? Sure a country's level of "multiculturalism" goes up and down, but damn man, isn't it obvious that it's been rare throughout history AND now?
The Americas: The English kicked out the natives and killed many.
The Spanish banned local cultural customs, creating Catholic Christian hegemony in South America.
Europe: Some countries were at war for decades. Why? Was it because they were of different religions? Nah, just different sects of the same religion.
Germany: 1933-1945 was more the putrid icing on the anti-multicultural cake than the main course.
Asia: Japan. Paragon of multiculturalism, right? "all non-Japanese cultures are equal, in that we have subjugated them all equally"
Korea... I'll leave you to your own opinions.
India: Hell, I don't even know what their culture was like before the British set up camp and started teaching them to be "cultured". I'll have to look, because I honestly feel bad about how little I know about the country before the generous efforts of England to "fix" them.
Middle East: Richard the Lionhearted and Saladin made peace to end the Third Crusade. What happened after that? 4 or 5 more crusades.
Israel: You might be under the direct control of Israel's federal government, but you sure as hell aren't going to vote in their elections (also, your house is now my apartment building lawl).
Saudi Arabia: It's illegal to talk about Christianity in a way that might convert people to it. I guess it would be less multicultural if you went ahead and fed them to lions.
China: It's illegal to think about certain things in certain ways. By definition that excludes cultures which think in those ways. (ex. Big Brother says there was a big party for Uncle Mao in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and everyone was totally stoked about it)
Africa: I couldn't tell you the difference between a Hutu and a Tutsi, but they have to... otherwise the whole ethnic cleansing thing would get all kinds of messy! If you include LGBT as a culture, you might find some resistance to "multiculturalism" there too.
Perhaps it would have been more accurate for you to say "uniformity imposing states are becoming ever-more powerful". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|