Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Grammar question.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Illysook



Joined: 30 Jun 2008

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:49 pm    Post subject: Grammar question. Reply with quote

I had a sentence in my powerpoint that a Korean English teacher questioned. I knew it was right, but I could not explain why. It went like this:

On Thanksgiving, there is so much food, that we have leftovers.

She asked me why I used the word that instead of which

I may have a comma problem going on, and that might be why she's confused, but I'm not sure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jizza



Joined: 24 Aug 2009

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You shouldn't have used a comma there. It's confusing the way it reads with a comma.

As for that vs. which, there are numerous grammar guides out there.

"which" is non-restrictive

"that" is restrictive

the best way to explain this is to see it in action.

The pen that he drew with is expensive.

Then pen, which he drew with, is expensive.

In the first example, 'that' is used to restrict which pens one is referring to.

In the second, the 'which' is not restricting which pen it is, it's just extra information which you may find relevant.


I usually add a "by the way" to "which" when I explain it.

The pen, which has blue ink by the way, is expensive. (all the pens may or may not be expensive. the pen with blue ink just happens to be expensive and that's all I know)

The pen that has blue ink is expensive. (Only the pen with blue ink is expensive)


edit:: I'll add that in actual usage, both 'that' and 'which' are often used interchangeably with no difference in meaning. There are just certain situations, such as the examples I outlined above, where you'd want to select 'that' or 'which' to express restriction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MrMr



Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Location: Korea

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:59 pm    Post subject: Grammar question. Reply with quote

Just a guess: "That or which" can be used alternately to introduce an adjective clause describing a place or thing. eg, On Thanksgiving there is so much food that/which is leftover. In your sentence "that we have leftovers" is a noun clause that answers the question 'WHAT"? There is so much food (what?) that we have left overs. I think only "that" can introduce a noun clause.

Not a great explaination maybe. I'm combing the memory banks for knowledge that i never mastered in the first place".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:48 am    Post subject: Re: Grammar question. Reply with quote

Illysook wrote:
I had a sentence in my powerpoint that a Korean English teacher questioned. I knew it was right, but I could not explain why. It went like this:

On Thanksgiving, there is so much food, that we have leftovers.

She asked me why I used the word that instead of which

I may have a comma problem going on, and that might be why she's confused, but I'm not sure.


The above posts give some good grammar information...but neither is correct.

Your example sentence has a classic example of an adverbial clause...result clause.
A result clause introduced by so much...+noun phrase + that
in the example...so much food that

On Thanksgiving, there is so much food that we have leftovers.
no comma.

Which is not acceptable in the adverbial clause...but could be used in a relative clause which is implied in the above example

On Thanksgiving, there is so much food which is not eaten that we have leftovers.

In relative clauses...'that' is restrictive ...'which' can be either.
The use of commas is what dictates restrictiveness for which.
However, there is a growing trend to view which as non restrictive...in which case a comma is used.
In the example I gave above...no comma was used...which can be viewed as restrictive...a more formal restrictive style.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jizza



Joined: 24 Aug 2009

PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

good explanation cosmic. I'm not sure if my post is really wrong though. Seems like we're saying the same thing.

ah ,I have a question for you. you seem to know your stuff.

i posted this in another thread but i'll hijack this one as I think the OP's question was sufficiently answered.


Can the "Such a ... that ... " construction accept an extra adverb? ie. "Such a really hot day that... "
Quote:
It was such a cold day that we stopped early. "It was such an extremely cold day that we stopped early."
The first one is acceptable obviously, but is the second?
My initial reaction was that it sounds awkward, and the extra adverb may be redundant. However, I'm not sure if there's any strict grammar rules for this. While rare, there do seem to be a few examples of this construction in writing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jizza wrote:
good explanation cosmic. I'm not sure if my post is really wrong though. Seems like we're saying the same thing.

ah ,I have a question for you. you seem to know your stuff.

i posted this in another thread but i'll hijack this one as I think the OP's question was sufficiently answered.


Can the "Such a ... that ... " construction accept an extra adverb? ie. "Such a really hot day that... "
Quote:
It was such a cold day that we stopped early. "It was such an extremely cold day that we stopped early."
The first one is acceptable obviously, but is the second?
My initial reaction was that it sounds awkward, and the extra adverb may be redundant. However, I'm not sure if there's any strict grammar rules for this. While rare, there do seem to be a few examples of this construction in writing.


...yes...even prescriptively it can...though, as you mention, it is rare, and some frown on it stylistically depending on the type of adverb used - often a regional selectiveness.
For some...'really' would sound off(slang/ungrammatical)....while incredibly/extremely would lend increased emphasis.

Compare:
It was such a really hot day that everyone cranked up their air conditioners.
It was such an incredibly hot day that everyone cranked up their air conditioners.

For some...the first would sound ungrammatical...while the second would tend to go unnoticed except for the added emphasis.

However...when overly redundant, really somehow becomes acceptable again.

It was such a really, really lame movie that people demanded refunds.
(This would be descriptive of speech)

Hope this helps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International