|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Illysook
Joined: 30 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:49 pm Post subject: Grammar question. |
|
|
I had a sentence in my powerpoint that a Korean English teacher questioned. I knew it was right, but I could not explain why. It went like this:
On Thanksgiving, there is so much food, that we have leftovers.
She asked me why I used the word that instead of which
I may have a comma problem going on, and that might be why she's confused, but I'm not sure. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jizza
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You shouldn't have used a comma there. It's confusing the way it reads with a comma.
As for that vs. which, there are numerous grammar guides out there.
"which" is non-restrictive
"that" is restrictive
the best way to explain this is to see it in action.
The pen that he drew with is expensive.
Then pen, which he drew with, is expensive.
In the first example, 'that' is used to restrict which pens one is referring to.
In the second, the 'which' is not restricting which pen it is, it's just extra information which you may find relevant.
I usually add a "by the way" to "which" when I explain it.
The pen, which has blue ink by the way, is expensive. (all the pens may or may not be expensive. the pen with blue ink just happens to be expensive and that's all I know)
The pen that has blue ink is expensive. (Only the pen with blue ink is expensive)
edit:: I'll add that in actual usage, both 'that' and 'which' are often used interchangeably with no difference in meaning. There are just certain situations, such as the examples I outlined above, where you'd want to select 'that' or 'which' to express restriction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MrMr
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:59 pm Post subject: Grammar question. |
|
|
Just a guess: "That or which" can be used alternately to introduce an adjective clause describing a place or thing. eg, On Thanksgiving there is so much food that/which is leftover. In your sentence "that we have leftovers" is a noun clause that answers the question 'WHAT"? There is so much food (what?) that we have left overs. I think only "that" can introduce a noun clause.
Not a great explaination maybe. I'm combing the memory banks for knowledge that i never mastered in the first place". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:48 am Post subject: Re: Grammar question. |
|
|
Illysook wrote: |
I had a sentence in my powerpoint that a Korean English teacher questioned. I knew it was right, but I could not explain why. It went like this:
On Thanksgiving, there is so much food, that we have leftovers.
She asked me why I used the word that instead of which
I may have a comma problem going on, and that might be why she's confused, but I'm not sure. |
The above posts give some good grammar information...but neither is correct.
Your example sentence has a classic example of an adverbial clause...result clause.
A result clause introduced by so much...+noun phrase + that
in the example...so much food that
On Thanksgiving, there is so much food that we have leftovers.
no comma.
Which is not acceptable in the adverbial clause...but could be used in a relative clause which is implied in the above example
On Thanksgiving, there is so much food which is not eaten that we have leftovers.
In relative clauses...'that' is restrictive ...'which' can be either.
The use of commas is what dictates restrictiveness for which.
However, there is a growing trend to view which as non restrictive...in which case a comma is used.
In the example I gave above...no comma was used...which can be viewed as restrictive...a more formal restrictive style. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jizza
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
|
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
good explanation cosmic. I'm not sure if my post is really wrong though. Seems like we're saying the same thing.
ah ,I have a question for you. you seem to know your stuff.
i posted this in another thread but i'll hijack this one as I think the OP's question was sufficiently answered.
Can the "Such a ... that ... " construction accept an extra adverb? ie. "Such a really hot day that... "
Quote: |
It was such a cold day that we stopped early. "It was such an extremely cold day that we stopped early."
The first one is acceptable obviously, but is the second?
My initial reaction was that it sounds awkward, and the extra adverb may be redundant. However, I'm not sure if there's any strict grammar rules for this. While rare, there do seem to be a few examples of this construction in writing. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
jizza wrote: |
good explanation cosmic. I'm not sure if my post is really wrong though. Seems like we're saying the same thing.
ah ,I have a question for you. you seem to know your stuff.
i posted this in another thread but i'll hijack this one as I think the OP's question was sufficiently answered.
Can the "Such a ... that ... " construction accept an extra adverb? ie. "Such a really hot day that... "
Quote: |
It was such a cold day that we stopped early. "It was such an extremely cold day that we stopped early."
The first one is acceptable obviously, but is the second?
My initial reaction was that it sounds awkward, and the extra adverb may be redundant. However, I'm not sure if there's any strict grammar rules for this. While rare, there do seem to be a few examples of this construction in writing. |
|
...yes...even prescriptively it can...though, as you mention, it is rare, and some frown on it stylistically depending on the type of adverb used - often a regional selectiveness.
For some...'really' would sound off(slang/ungrammatical)....while incredibly/extremely would lend increased emphasis.
Compare:
It was such a really hot day that everyone cranked up their air conditioners.
It was such an incredibly hot day that everyone cranked up their air conditioners.
For some...the first would sound ungrammatical...while the second would tend to go unnoticed except for the added emphasis.
However...when overly redundant, really somehow becomes acceptable again.
It was such a really, really lame movie that people demanded refunds.
(This would be descriptive of speech)
Hope this helps. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|