|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
darkcity

Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: SF, CA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:53 pm Post subject: grammar question (that/what) |
|
|
Googling this doesn't help since "that" and "what" are such common words. However, I think I've managed to think it through, but I wanted to check here in case I've missed anything.
The question is, when to use "that" and "what" (as relative pronouns)
1) I got the dog that I wanted.
2) I got what I wanted.
As far as I can tell, "what" as a relative pronoun is when following a verb, and "that" follows a noun.
This is mostly clear and seems to work in all the examples I can think of.
But it gets confusing when the verb is "said"
1) He said what he wanted to.
2) He said that he wanted to.
In the first example, "what" is the relative pronoun following the verb; same as the above example.
In the second example, "that" is NOT functioning as a relative pronoun but as a conjunction and subordinator, used to summarize something that was said.
Am I right? Did I miss anything? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Skyblue
Joined: 02 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2011 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You've got it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
daskalos
Joined: 19 May 2006 Location: The Road to Ithaca
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Perfect. Further, in common conversation, you could even drop "that" in your first example and be "correct."
That is, "I got the dog I wanted."
You can't, however, drop the "what" in your second sentence. I got I wanted? No. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alljokingaside
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hate to bust the party, but not always.
eg "I gave John [what he wanted]." (ie a red velvet cake)
If I'm correct (and if I'm not...well, I hail from CPS, one of the US's finest! educational areas, so suck it), the "what," here, forms part of the noun clause, the indirect object
whereas "that," as in "I told John THAT he would get fat", signifies the preceding with its wish-washy, transitive verb as the dependent clause,
Essentially, anything [in the brackets] acts as a variable, whereas anything following CAPITALIZED (ie "that) is pretty much fixed
For more fun, "I told John THAT [what he wanted] was not only illegal, but entirely time-consuming in it acquisition."
And even more fun, "I told John THAT [what he wanted(, the dead babies,)] would stink up the house"
Again, city school.
===
And for
1) He said what he wanted to.
2) He said that he wanted to.
=
1) He said [what he wanted to] (eg yes; that he was eating grapes today; that Korean vocational high school students are GR-R-REAT!; etc etc)
2) He said (what did he say?) THAT he wanted to....be done with grammar once and for all.
Some of the terms here might not be spot on (again CPS; I'm just happy I made it out in one piece), but hope it helps. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seems to me that what the above poster said is correct. All depends if you are creating a noun or adjective clause and if so, you then need to use the correct marker. Expanding on that, the noun and adjective clauses have different rules on what you can and can't drop when creating a reduced noun or adjective clause. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alljokingaside wrote: |
Hate to bust the party, but not always.
eg "I gave John [what he wanted]." (ie a red velvet cake)
If I'm correct (and if I'm not...well, I hail from CPS, one of the US's finest! educational areas, so suck it), the "what," here, forms part of the noun clause, the indirect object |
...perhaps you meant direct object? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Thiuda

Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Location: Religion ist f�r Sklaven geschaffen, f�r Wesen ohne Geist.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:31 am Post subject: Re: grammar question (that/what) |
|
|
darkcity wrote: |
Googling this doesn't help since "that" and "what" are such common words. However, I think I've managed to think it through, but I wanted to check here in case I've missed anything. |
The technical term for grammatical items such as these is Complementiser (C). The book Basic English Syntax and Exercises provides an intro to this word category, as well as to Complementiser Phrases (CP).
darkcity wrote: |
The question is, when to use "that" and "what" (as relative pronouns) |
(1) I got the dog that I wanted.
(2) I got what I wanted
In (1) that introduces a complement clause, not a relative clause. The subject of a relative clause is the relative pronoun introducing it, in complement clauses that functions as a conjunction. The word what in (2) is also not a relative pronoun, it is a pro-form, see (3) below.
(3) I got [DP the apartment] I wanted.
In (3) the DP is the direct object of the verb, followed by a null complementiser and the complement clause I wanted. See (4) for the full derivation.
(4) [CP [C NUL][TP [DP I] [T' [T 1SgP] [VP [V get] [DP [D the] [NP [N apartment] [CP [C PRO] [TP [DP I] [T' [T 1SgP][VP [V want]]]]]]]]]]]
If you want to see the tree, go to http://ironcreek.net/phpsyntaxtree/ and insert the bracketed notation above into the space at the top of the page.
If you want to use that and what as relative pronouns, they have to be the subjects of the clause they introduce, as in the examples below.
(5) I got the dog [that humped my leg].
(6) I got [what became my best friend in later years]. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:15 pm Post subject: Re: grammar question (that/what) |
|
|
Thiuda wrote: |
If you want to use that and what as relative pronouns, they have to be the subjects of the clause they introduce, as in the examples below.
(5) I got the dog [that humped my leg].
(6) I got [what became my best friend in later years]. |
hmmm...actually...this is not entirely correct.
In relative clauses, 'that' can occur as the subject, the direct object, the indirect object, and also the object of a preposition.
As was correctly mentioned in yawarakaijin's post, the rules for dropping the relativized pronoun need to be observed.
When the relativized pronoun is the subject...required.
When the relativized pronoun is either the direct object, indirect object or the object of a preposition...optional.
The guidelines that are at work here are quite popular. (subject)
The guidelines that people mentioned are quite useful. (direct object)
The grammar book that I gave you is full of useful guidelines. (indirect object)
The rules that others have spoken about often have several valid interpretations. (object of a preposition) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|