View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Swampfox10mm
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ThingsComeAround

Joined: 07 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Funny- the shooting incident guy was definitely not a soldier.
And funny how they suggest an increased military presence as opposed to a police presence... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The link stated that this plan is the result of two incidents. Two. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ThingsComeAround

Joined: 07 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CentralCali wrote: |
The link stated that this plan is the result of two incidents. Two. |
Why after two incidents do we need military patrolling city streets? Why? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We don't. Anyway, the Courtesy Patrol is patrolling the military, not the general population. Also, as another poster mentioned, perhaps an increased civilian police presence might be a better idea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TECO

Joined: 20 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
So what police powers do they have in Itaewon? Never see them out patrolling in Japan, just Itaewon. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
TECO wrote: |
So what police powers do they have in Itaewon? Never see them out patrolling in Japan, just Itaewon. |
Those aren't courtesy patrols in Itaeweon, IIRC. They're military police. The MPs have zero police powers over civilians; however, they can arrest members of the US military. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CentralCali wrote: |
TECO wrote: |
So what police powers do they have in Itaewon? Never see them out patrolling in Japan, just Itaewon. |
Those aren't courtesy patrols in Itaeweon, IIRC. They're military police. The MPs have zero police powers over civilians; however, they can arrest members of the US military. |
I hung out with an MP a few times, and IIRC, they aren't allowed to actually touch anybody, even US military. If they need to arrest military they call in some Korean police. I may be mistaken though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So what is the difference between Courtesy Patrol and MP's? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CentralCali wrote: |
We don't. Anyway, the Courtesy Patrol is patrolling the military, not the general population. |
Right, this is key. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fishead soup
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jvalmer wrote: |
So what is the difference between Courtesy Patrol and MP's? |
Courtesy Patrol are there to advise soldiers not to go to Juicy bars or bars deemed off limits due to prostitution.
MP deal with all other problems AWOL |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jvalmer wrote: |
So what is the difference between Courtesy Patrol and MP's? |
Military Police are Service members who are assigned as police officers with jurisdiction over military personnel and also jurisdiction on military reservations. Military Police can affect an arrest of personnel under their jurisdiction.
A Courtesy Patrol (or Shore Patrol as the Navy terms it) is composed of Service members who are assigned to promote good order and discipline among the military community both on- and off-base.
Neither the Military Police nor Courtesy Patrol has jurisdiction over civilians off-base. For example, say I'm in Itaeweon and a uniformed MP or CP requests I show them ID. They have no authority over me and thus no recourse if I refuse. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|