|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ramen
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sirius black wrote: |
| kcs0001 wrote: |
| sirius black wrote: |
| ELGORDO wrote: |
If you take crime stats X-Africans, the U.S. is in line with European developed countries. For you budding real estate investors- if you avoid areas with a relatively high section-8 concentration, you can do well in the inland empire and Arizona.
http://www.morganquitno.com/cit07pop.htm#25
http://zipskinny.com/ |
Not sure what 'crime stats X-Africans' means exactly. Cities with low black crime rates or cities with a low number of blacks. There is a difference. |
Crime stats X-Africans means "excluding Africans." But you don't be into business term stuff wiff yo hip-hop bad sef. I realize the expression might be alien to you, but it is used daily for profit making enterprises that try to isolate areas of their business where they either make or lose money.
For example, many insurance companies give their annual reports X-Newark, NJ meaning that it makes no sense to do business there, but the detrement is manageable if you take into consideration of the risk on the eastern seaboard as a whole. |
So, its my second possibility that is right then? So, all white people would know what that means then from what I can ascertain from your comments. So, how do you know I'm not white? My screen name is a character from Harry Potter. Not that it should make a difference, but it seems important to you judging from your response.
That list has NYC on it for cities over a certain size. I didn' know there weren't many black people in NYC. The first website itself just has headings that say most dangerous or safe for various cities of size. It doesn't state race as a determining factor.
I've been to or have been acquainted with a few of the cities on the safe list. The common denominator I've seen from the ones I know is that they are middle class or higher socioeconomically. A word of note to you as a socalled expert. Safe cities tend to have higher average income. Its rarely about race. The few high average income predominantly or largely black areas I know of are typically adjacent to poorer areas and almost all crimes in that area are from those from the adjacent, lower income areas that come there and commit crimes (Windsor Hills section of Los Angeles area for example).
Therefore I assume you looked up each city to see what the black population was and extrapolated that as a common denominator. Since 'you sho nuff know that sh*t' as you wrote as if you're well versed in that type of talk, should it matter what the demographics of a safe city is? Safe is safe isn't it? I certainly couldn't care less what the demos are as long as its safe. Must matter to you then that a city has to be safe AND not have black people.
Interesting.
Doesn't matter where some of us "run" to. In about 50 years there won't be many places in America to 'hide'. What is now the majority culture, if trends continue, will be the minority culture...and language.
Oh, the irony.
Adios  |
sirus negro is mexican? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Triban

Joined: 14 Jul 2009 Location: Suwon Station
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sirius black
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sirius Black is a wizard.
Its interesting how some people wish to validate someone based on what they perceive their race is. I've tried to debate facts, stats, etc. concrete things.
If someone is claiming 1+1=2, I'm failing to see if that person being white, black or latino or martian validates or invalidates what they post?
Some people just have a pre-occupation with race or ethnicity and make value judgments based on such trivial and asanine criteria. Its as inane as if the person is left handed or their favorite color is blue.
It speaks volume about the person. We all make certain snap judgments based on color, etc. Its human nature. The extent its taken in some threads on DavesESL is amazing.
Every perconceived stereotype I've had about a great many people have been happily erased because I've been blessed to have done some traveling not only around America but Europe, South America and Asia.
Someone once told me that traveling is one of the best cures for prejudice. I've found that to be true. Unfortunately its not true for everyone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sirius black wrote: |
| shifter2009 wrote: |
| sirius black wrote: |
In American history, other groups, in particular the Irish have had a similar crime record and in some cases higher than present day black americans. If you look at closer, there were many of the same factors. Chronically poor, under educated, substitute alcohol for drugs, also both groups faced a lot of prejudice in hiring practices (No Irish Need Apply was a common part of job ads in the 1800s).
|
Apparently the "no irish need apply" thing is largely a myth. I have seen a couple articles debunking it, this is just the first one that came up in google.
http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm |
Interesting. It seems it was alive in England. In any case the Irish faced similar prejudice as blacks do today and even prompted a political party (the Know Nothing party) who's primary issue was to curb Irish (Catholic) immigration.
This was a quote from the then Chicago Post in the 19th century:
The Chicago Post wrote, "The Irish fill our prisons, our poor houses...Scratch a convict or a pauper, and the chances are that you tickle the skin of an Irish Catholic. Putting them on a boat and sending them home would end crime in this country."
Not too much different than what some think of blacks today. |
So what you're saying is a century from now, we should be golden, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Triban

Joined: 14 Jul 2009 Location: Suwon Station
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Whatevs mayne I'm on dat patron! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| shifter2009 wrote: |
| sirius black wrote: |
In American history, other groups, in particular the Irish have had a similar crime record and in some cases higher than present day black americans. If you look at closer, there were many of the same factors. Chronically poor, under educated, substitute alcohol for drugs, also both groups faced a lot of prejudice in hiring practices (No Irish Need Apply was a common part of job ads in the 1800s).
|
Apparently the "no irish need apply" thing is largely a myth. I have seen a couple articles debunking it, this is just the first one that came up in google.
http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm |
Gems like this are why I love this board so much. NINA is a myth? Its shocking and yet it makes so much sense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sirius black
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
| shifter2009 wrote: |
| sirius black wrote: |
In American history, other groups, in particular the Irish have had a similar crime record and in some cases higher than present day black americans. If you look at closer, there were many of the same factors. Chronically poor, under educated, substitute alcohol for drugs, also both groups faced a lot of prejudice in hiring practices (No Irish Need Apply was a common part of job ads in the 1800s).
|
Apparently the "no irish need apply" thing is largely a myth. I have seen a couple articles debunking it, this is just the first one that came up in google.
http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm |
Gems like this are why I love this board so much. NINA is a myth? Its shocking and yet it makes so much sense! |
But the prejudice was real. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
| shifter2009 wrote: |
| sirius black wrote: |
In American history, other groups, in particular the Irish have had a similar crime record and in some cases higher than present day black americans. If you look at closer, there were many of the same factors. Chronically poor, under educated, substitute alcohol for drugs, also both groups faced a lot of prejudice in hiring practices (No Irish Need Apply was a common part of job ads in the 1800s).
|
Apparently the "no irish need apply" thing is largely a myth. I have seen a couple articles debunking it, this is just the first one that came up in google.
http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm |
Gems like this are why I love this board so much. NINA is a myth? Its shocking and yet it makes so much sense! |
It is not a myth. It did actually happen. It came more from people who still felt strong ties to England and had this English prejudice vis-a-vis the Irish.
1862 song, "No Irish Need Apply", was inspired by NINA signs in London. Later Irish Americans adapted the lyrics to include their own perception.
Historians have hotly debated the issue of anti-Irish job discrimination in the United States. Some insist that the "No Irish need apply" signs were common, but others such as Jensen argue that anti-Irish job discrimination was not a significant factor in the United States, these signs and print advertisements being most commonly posted by the limited number of early 19th century English immigrants to the United States who shared in the prejudices of their homeland.[15]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Irish_sentiment |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dogbert wrote: |
| sirius black wrote: |
| shifter2009 wrote: |
| sirius black wrote: |
In American history, other groups, in particular the Irish have had a similar crime record and in some cases higher than present day black americans. If you look at closer, there were many of the same factors. Chronically poor, under educated, substitute alcohol for drugs, also both groups faced a lot of prejudice in hiring practices (No Irish Need Apply was a common part of job ads in the 1800s).
|
Apparently the "no irish need apply" thing is largely a myth. I have seen a couple articles debunking it, this is just the first one that came up in google.
http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/no-irish.htm |
Interesting. It seems it was alive in England. In any case the Irish faced similar prejudice as blacks do today and even prompted a political party (the Know Nothing party) who's primary issue was to curb Irish (Catholic) immigration.
This was a quote from the then Chicago Post in the 19th century:
The Chicago Post wrote, "The Irish fill our prisons, our poor houses...Scratch a convict or a pauper, and the chances are that you tickle the skin of an Irish Catholic. Putting them on a boat and sending them home would end crime in this country."
Not too much different than what some think of blacks today. |
So what you're saying is a century from now, we should be golden, right? |
I can understand that the Irish were discriminated against, and African Americans have long been discriminated against. However, we are talking about something so different. There were Irishmen who signed the Declaration of Independence. A large percentage of the colonial army fighting Britain was Irish. Andrew Jackson was of Irish descent, I believe. Yes, disproportionately there were more Irishmen in jail than the mainstream, but did they ever reach 50% of the jailed population? We don't know that. Irish Americans didn't have it as bad as African Americans in the past in general. If you became a Protestant or somehow adopted the norms no one could tell you apart from the rest of society based on your appearance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kcs0001
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The country is broke. Yeah, they can do QE3, but its almost reaching the point of "Killing the goose that laid the golden egg."
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/04/the_racialization_of_deficit_c.html
Robert Weissberg, American Thinker, April 25, 2011
Race is increasingly infusing the current debate over federal spending and the soaring national debt. {snip}
The modern civil rights movement was initially about personal liberty�from attending schools of one�s choosing, to sitting wherever one chose on a bus and being able to vote regardless of skin color, among myriad other liberties. Yes, expanded federal power was vital but intercessions such as affirmative action were, supposedly, only temporary legal steps to guarantee African Americans options heretofore available only to whites.
With time, however, relatively cheap government edicts were replaced by expensive entitlements. Expanding the Great Society�s anti-poverty programs became a way of life. Opening up the housing market evolved from anti-discrimination laws to the right to government-supplied decent housing, and if that option was unobtainable, government would subsidize private housing or mandate (and guarantee) below-market home mortgages. Laws banning racial discrimination in employment were similarly supplanted by government jobs to soak up black unemployment (blacks now comprise one out of every five non-postal federal employees). Head Start replaced the local babysitter and mandated integration became oversize bureaucracies to assure equal outcomes. In cities with sizable black populations, e.g., Detroit or Newark, municipal jobs became life-savers. Washington has also repeatedly extended unemployment benefits, a benefit that disproportionately helps blacks given their higher levels of joblessness. In a nutshell, for many African Americans �civil rights� has come to mean government generosity, a generosity increasingly financed by borrowing.
The obvious problem is sustainability, as debt replaced tax revenue. {snip} Unfortunately, this fiscal predicament is now being perceived as an attack on African American civil rights. {snip}
This is hardly a fringe view. The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) website similarly affirms that the quest to escape crushing debt is an anti-black subterfuge. As one CBC member put it,� It is important that everyone understands that in their proposed 2012 budget, Republicans are diverting money from programs needed by the poor, seniors and people with disabilities to corporations and the wealthy in our country.� It is further argued that attempts to reverse ObamaCare means denying health care to many who are now, finally, on the verge of obtaining decent health care. In fact, in 2011 the CBC offered its own budget in the House that reversed some of President Obama�s cuts but it was soundly rejected by a 3 to 1 margin. It predictably called for spending increases for education, job training and other programs to help the poor, to be paid for by upping taxes on the wealthy. The NAACP has recently deplored America�s �under-funding� of education though educational spending has dramatically increased with little to show for these extra billions (and many cities with largely black school populations are among the nation�s best funded schools). {snip}.
Endless borrowing to finance a steady stream of government benefits may seem quite reasonable for many African Americans, particularly those with limited education. It is hardly surprising that after a few years of enjoying a benefit it grows into an unalienable right. Nearly half of all Americans do not pay federal taxes so subsidized housing, food stamps, Head Start and all the rest are �free� {snip}. {snip} African Americans also seem particularly prone to debt, running up larger credit card debts than whites (often double) of comparable incomes (see, for example, here). {snip} Poorly educated citizens in general may also be befuddled with terms like �billion� and �trillion,� let alone the international consequences of excessive indebtedness, so all the dire warnings are just too abstract.
{snip} For many Americans helping African Americans entails a moral obligation that exists independently of fiscal prudence. Further add the difficulty generating private sector employment for many African Americans (trying to boost private sector employment via empowerment zones has proven futile). Most clearly, linking fiscal cutbacks to an �attack� on African American civil rights automatically mobilizes a sizable congressional block of anti-cutback votes (including white legislators dependent on black voters). Resistance will hold even if budgetary hawks like Paul Ryan (R.-WI) can demonstrate that these �civil rights� programs are often wasteful, ineffectual and equally applicable to whites. {snip}
Less obvious, but perhaps of greater importance (though still unspeakable) is the possible link between government cutbacks and domestic violence. Recall that many of today�s programs helping blacks were a response to 1960s urban violence, and they have succeeded. Cutting ethanol subsidies to Iowa farmers is a mere inconvenience compared to firing thousands of black teacher assistants who have few non-government job options. Significant cutbacks here will bring �cold turkey� on a grand scale and expressions like �long hot summer� may soon return.
In the final analysis, the only practical solution may be sustaining government programs that disproportionately assist blacks, regardless of value or costs. {snip} |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the hope for the African American community would be for straightening out the younger generation. One needs to aggressively ensure that African American, Hispanic, and white kids do not have outstanding truancies. If necessary, we should have more boot camps. We need to also have more security in schools, decriminalize drugs, but arrest drug dealers. Decriminilazing drugs in the U.S. would take pressure off Mexico, reduce gang violence there and in the U.S. However, we must go after drug dealers. They are selling poison. The war on drugs destroys people who are disadvantaged and poor most of them. African Americans are capable as anyone to perform well if we can intervene properly to help them do that instead of making excuses. The majority of African Americans are middle class and successful. Everyone must make it in America. We can't make excuses for any Americans, but we should help all Americans succeed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ramen
Joined: 15 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i notice the term "redneck" being used a lot in this forum. where i'm from, if i ever called someone "a redneck," i'd be beat half to death and strung and dragged behind a pick-up truck around my home town. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NovaKart
Joined: 18 Nov 2009 Location: Iraq
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Where do you come from? I'm from Kentucky and there many people proudly call themselves rednecks but it's used pejoratively too.
I just read the Jensen article, well not all of it yet. It's interesting how most of the strong anti-Irish prejudice was in the 19th century but people living today talk about it as if they experienced it and claim to have seen no Irish need apply signs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Madigan
Joined: 15 Oct 2010
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ^This is true. The progeny of Ireland has done very well for themselves in America. I believe that about 60% of those with Irish surnames have at least a bachelors degree, and many work in well paying white collar jobs. the "woe is me - my great great grand parents suffered during the period of reconstruction" just sounds ridiculous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stilicho25
Joined: 05 Apr 2010
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|