Korean Job Discussion Forums

[Abe Scrap]

[Abe Scrap]

[ZIFA]

[Steelrails]

Good grief you never even knew anything had happened until that first time in the shower with someone different.

So you lose sensation, but guess what, you don't get the foreskin pain. It's a tradeoff.

It's not the same as women who have outright removal.

And as for me, I am uncut and let me tell you that pain you sometimes get from a long night is no cup of tea either and has had me wishing something could have been done as a child or wondering if there could be a painless way now.

But I won't hold it against my parents or the doctor.

[Abe Scrap]

[Underwaterbob]

Science Fiction?

[Konglishman]

In fact, in Christianity, there is no religious compulsion ordering circumcision. I understand that many if not most Europeans never undergo the procedure. The original reason that circumcision got instituted in America is because a doctor was advocating it as a way to reduce the likelihood of masturbation. Strange as it sounds, I am not kidding.

[whitestboyalive]

OK, here's my argument against steelrails and others here in favor of circumcision.

- Perceptual difference: The Sex & The City argument is invalid, because that is from a purely North American perspective. Go to Europe and ask a European girl what she thinks of circumcised manhood: to her it looks strange and alien, because she is accustomed to seeing the natural, uncut, unaltered manhood. Also, having been with a Euro girl for many years, they get pleasure out of knowing we get more pleasure too. So, it's all about what you grow up with and consider a norm, not what inherently looks normal. It's all about what we're raised with seeing in the media. So, in this way, North American's views are totally distorted.

I will tell you, as an uncut male and very thankful about it, I've never ran into a problem with a North American girl thinking it looked "alien" as the manhood looks the same whilst erect anyhow (no difference whatsoever in appearance). It only looks different in the flaccid state. Besides, women are not even that turned on (visually) by manhood... their minds work much differently than males, and if you didn't know that, start reading up about women and what actually turns them on! You may be surprised that it has little to do with what is between your legs! So, really, let's kill the 'appearance' argument. It has no validity whatsoever.

- Health benefit argument is invalid: Sometimes it is beneficial to cut out someone kidney, or tonsils, or apendix, if something is wrong with it or it threatens your health or your life. But we only do so when there is a real need. If there is no real medical need to circumcise, then why do it?

- Studies argument: Studies on this are so varied, and if there is a slight difference, it may just be due to the sample taken randomly being higher in one study than the other. There are so many things that could have affected the person's health (such as sexuality, number of partners, living conditions, socio-economic status, access to clean water, soap, etc.) The reason the results are so inconclusive points to the fact that there is no real benefit to circumcision. If there were some giant smoking gun, then we would obviously be circumcising right, left, and center! But we aren't. And us uncut guys are doing just fine down there.

- Personally I think that those who are already circumcised, a small portion perhaps, don't know what they are missing out on so they cannot imagine the use of the foreskin. They never had foreskin, so they don't know how good it is to have.

Or they may feel they are missing out, and since they are missing out, everyone else should miss out too. I should say here that I know not all cut men feel that way, just the ones wishing the same harm done on others that is done to them (a totally normal psychological response). I would say that I feel very sorry for those who were circumcised without their approval, without being educated about it. For you men out there who are "cut" I think you should do something to stop this barbarity. I say take a stance, don't cut your boys manhood, and support the ban.

For the religious types, there's nothing I can say really. I guess if that is your belief, unfortunately with the political-correctness of accepting religion these days, parents will do to their kids what they want. But probably in the future, this will be seen as a human rights abuse.

[Underwaterbob]

[Abe Scrap]

^ I believe what he is referring to is that in the erect states, both cut and uncut penes feature prominent protrusion of the glans, while in the flaccid states, the cut phallus still has its glans protruding while the uncut one looks like a worm in a turtleneck.

[riverboy]

[comm]

[Captain Corea]

[whitestboyalive]

[riverboy]