Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2 Grammar Questions, Multiple Choice
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
YTMND



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Location: You're the man now dog!!

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:21 pm    Post subject: 2 Grammar Questions, Multiple Choice Reply with quote

Do you see 1 or 2 possible answers to the grammar questions below? If only 1, why?

1. Do you know the girl ___ by the teacher now?
a. to be mentioned
b. being mentioned
c. mentioned
d. mentioning

2. The morning air is so good ___.
a. to be breathed
b. to breathe
c. breathing
d. being breathed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:49 pm    Post subject: Re: 2 Grammar Questions, Multiple Choice Reply with quote

YTMND wrote:
Do you see 1 or 2 possible answers to the grammar questions below? If only 1, why?

1. Do you know the girl ___ by the teacher now?
a. to be mentioned
b. being mentioned
c. mentioned
d. mentioning

2. The morning air is so good ___.
a. to be breathed
b. to breathe
c. breathing
d. being breathed


One possible answer. 1. "Now" makes the use of the progressive, answer b. correct. The others can't. You need the being because it's passive voice.However, the whole thing is off because how can you be commenting at the same time the teacher "is mentioning" since a mention is quick and short. "Do you know the girl the teacher just mentioned?" would be regular usage.

2. Answer is again b. c. has the air doing the breathing, which is logically impossible. d. is passive without an object to act, a. is future which makes no sense since the morning air isn't going to change; it;s always good. And besides, they're not in the corpus.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YTMND



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Location: You're the man now dog!!

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What if you looked at the word "now" in a different way.

A: Do you remember the person we met at the party?
B: No, I don't. Which one?
A: The one with blonde hair and red glasses. Do you remember now?
B: Oh, yea. I remember now.

Do you still think there's only 1 correct answer now?

In the second sentence, I would choose "b" also. However, I thought "a" might also be acceptable even though it sounds awkward.

The morning air is so good to be breathed.
It is so good to breathe morning air.

I don't think "to be" refers 100% to future events, but rather recurring events. I do think it sounds strange, but I don't know of a grammatical rule to say it's wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

YTMND wrote:
What if you looked at the word "now" in a different way.

A: Do you remember the person we met at the party?
B: No, I don't. Which one?
A: The one with blonde hair and red glasses. Do you remember now?
B: Oh, yea. I remember now.

Do you still think there's only 1 correct answer now?

In the second sentence, I would choose "b" also. However, I thought "a" might also be acceptable even though it sounds awkward.

The morning air is so good to be breathed.
It is so good to breathe morning air.

I don't think "to be" refers 100% to future events, but rather recurring events. I do think it sounds strange, but I don't know of a grammatical rule to say it's wrong.

You've changed the context, so I still say one answer for #1.

Can you give examples of "to be" referring to recurring events because I don't buy that at all. To be continued...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
edwardcatflap



Joined: 22 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In one, a is also possible as a future form

e.g.

That man is to be executed in a few minutes
That man is to be executed now (very near future)
That girl is to be mentioned by the teacher in a few minutes (for doing something good/bad)
Do you know the girl to be mentioned by the teacher now?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
YTMND



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Location: You're the man now dog!!

PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

edwardcatflap,

I like the change from knowing to killing Razz

But yea, that's what I am getting at. Also, couldn't you say, "Do you know the girl mentioned by the teacher now?" (The teacher mentions a girl at the school, the person being asked later meets her, and then a classmate asks. Maybe more time has to go by to make it more realistic, but I think you can understand the point I am making here.)

Quote:
You've changed the context


Changed it from what the test makers were thinking, yea probably. That's why I asked. However, when taking a test, I don't see how an answer should be completely wrong just because the test makers didn't consider it.

Quote:
Can you give examples of "to be" referring to recurring events


"To be woken up by the neighbor's dog every morning gives me a headache. I should talk to my neighbor about this."

It sounds awkward, but I don't see it as wrong. Is there a rule that would clearly prevent it from being acceptable in all possible situations?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

YTMND wrote:
edwardcatflap,

I like the change from knowing to killing Razz

But yea, that's what I am getting at. Also, couldn't you say, "Do you know the girl mentioned by the teacher now?" (The teacher mentions a girl at the school, the person being asked later meets her, and then a classmate asks. Maybe more time has to go by to make it more realistic, but I think you can understand the point I am making here.)

Quote:
You've changed the context


Changed it from what the test makers were thinking, yea probably. That's why I asked. However, when taking a test, I don't see how an answer should be completely wrong just because the test makers didn't consider it.

Quote:
Can you give examples of "to be" referring to recurring events


"To be woken up by the neighbor's dog every morning gives me a headache. I should talk to my neighbor about this."

It sounds awkward, but I don't see it as wrong. Is there a rule that would clearly prevent it from being acceptable in all possible situations?

It's not wrong but you've changed the verb tense with woken so it doesn't apply to your original example.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YTMND



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Location: You're the man now dog!!

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It's not wrong but you've changed the verb tense with woken so it doesn't apply to your original example.


I don't understand what you are talking about. In 1, I was addressing the word "now". It is not a verb and could not be construed as a verb tense. Or were you referring to 2? I don't see what point you would be making in either case. Please expound.

In any case, I didn't post a different answer or question. I merely interpreted the question differently. The issue here is interpretation vs. standardized answers based on only one line of thinking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

YTMND wrote:
Quote:
It's not wrong but you've changed the verb tense with woken so it doesn't apply to your original example.


I don't understand what you are talking about. In 1, I was addressing the word "now". It is not a verb and could not be construed as a verb tense. Or were you referring to 2? I don't see what point you would be making in either case. Please expound.

In any case, I didn't post a different answer or question. I merely interpreted the question differently. The issue here is interpretation vs. standardized answers based on only one line of thinking.

Changing the verb tense used in the sentence is not re-interpreting it.

Good luck with finding the answer you're seeking. I gave you my answer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wings



Joined: 09 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

double post

Last edited by wings on Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wings



Joined: 09 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"To be woken up by the neighbor's dog every morning gives me a headache. I should talk to my neighbor about this."

This is wrong as an infinitive can't be a subject in everyday modern English. You can still find examples of it in proverbs etc, or in cases where the old fashioned grammar is being used as emphasis but you can't use this form outside of relics.


You need a gerund here "Being woken up..." not an infinitive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YTMND



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Location: You're the man now dog!!

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wings wrote:
"To be woken up by the neighbor's dog every morning gives me a headache. I should talk to my neighbor about this."

This is wrong as an infinitive can't be a subject in everyday modern English. You can still find examples of it in proverbs etc, or in cases where the old fashioned grammar is being used as emphasis but you can't use this form outside of relics.


You need a gerund here "Being woken up..." not an infinitive.


wings, you came in to the middle of a conversation. The original post wasn't about what you commented on. A person replied to me asking for an example, I gave an example, supported now by your information.

Please read the whole thread before commenting. From top, work your way down, don't just bite at the bottom post. Look at the original post and see if 1 or 2 answers are correct.

Looking forward to reading your opinions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Binch Lover



Joined: 25 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

YTMND, what's your point of this post? You ask a question and then get snippy at people who respond.

Why don't you just consider the "right answer" to be the best or most logical answer? As you have shown, it takes a bit of explanation to set up a context in which answer (a) is correct. However, answer (b) jumps out as being correct in any context.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wings



Joined: 09 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
wings, you came in to the middle of a conversation. The original post wasn't about what you commented on. A person replied to me asking for an example, I gave an example, supported now by your information.


I did read the whole thread. I responded only to something that I saw that was wrong that happened to be halfway down the page.

My example doesn't support you. You are wrong.

There is only 1 right answer to the multiple choice questions you posted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YTMND



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Location: You're the man now dog!!

PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
YTMND, what's your point of this post? You ask a question and then get snippy at people who respond.


The point is to get an opinion, not to read someone's reply which is out of sequence in a conversation I was having with another person.

I understand comments like theirs and yours will get in the way of a fluid conversation. Thank you for the comments you made in the second part. That's what I was looking for.

Quote:
I saw that was wrong


You said it was wrong within a limited context, but not always.

Quote:
My example doesn't support you.


I don't see any example sentences by you.

Quote:
There is only 1 right answer to the multiple choice questions you posted.


Then, we disagree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International