Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Drive-by Shootings now?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
spilot101



Joined: 05 Sep 2012

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
To contain communism. The capabilities of the S.Korean army and nation are vastly different now compared to then.


Yep. So are the priorities. The pool of cheap labor has been the US's main interest in Asia since the 70s (paired with cheap natural resources of South America).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Corea



Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://koreajoongangdaily.joinsmsn.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2967972&cloc=joongangdaily|home|newslist1

Quote:
The American soldiers in the vehicle drove at Lim four times after seeing the officer getting out of the taxi. Lim fired a blank into the air as a warning and then fired three live bullets into the car, but the soldiers fled after hitting Lim in the knee with their car
.

Trying to run down a cop and actually hitting them - yeah, they're lucky they're still alive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did anyone notice this part of the story...

Quote:
A 30-year-old police officer surnamed Lim was near the scene helping a foreigner who was locked up in a bank ATM booth when a taxi driver surnamed Choi, 38, who witnessed the soldiers running away from the subway station, told him what he saw and asked the officer to get in his cab.


What the heck? Guys trapped in ATM machines, taxi drivers giving high-speed chase. All this story needs now is for the unidentified 3rd person to be a midget.

Quote:
near the Hamilton Hotel at 11:53 p.m. on Saturday....

Quote:
... followed them into a dead end in Seongsu-dong, Gwangjin District, eastern Seoul, at 12:10 a.m. yesterday


Nice job with traffic and all. Also,isn't Seongsu-dong in Seongsu-gu?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stan Rogers



Joined: 20 Aug 2010

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
Stan Rogers wrote:
The Korean authorites will punish them, and when they are done; the US army will punish them.


People keep saying things like this; however, it's an ill-informed comment. Under the UCMJ, if the accused are punished by a court, even a foreign court, they cannot legally be charged with the same crime by a military court ("double jeopardy" also is a concept in military justice). On the other hand, depending on the severity of the crime and/or sentence, the accused may be administratively separated. Technically, that's not a punishment; it's just an "administrative matter."

Yes, I know that in the past some military members have been punished twice for the same offense. That was in the distant past. Some have been punished for "damage to government property" when they somehow injured themselves, although members of the military are not now and have never been military property.


I didn't say they would be put on trial twice for the same crime. I said they would be punished by the Korean authorities, and when they are done; the US army will punish them (administratively). I can guarantee that does not involve anything pleasant.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Son Deureo!



Joined: 30 Apr 2003

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stan Rogers wrote:
the US army will punish them (administratively). I can guarantee that does not involve anything pleasant.


From what I've seen, it certainly doesn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stan Rogers wrote:
CentralCali wrote:
Stan Rogers wrote:
The Korean authorites will punish them, and when they are done; the US army will punish them.


People keep saying things like this; however, it's an ill-informed comment. Under the UCMJ, if the accused are punished by a court, even a foreign court, they cannot legally be charged with the same crime by a military court ("double jeopardy" also is a concept in military justice). On the other hand, depending on the severity of the crime and/or sentence, the accused may be administratively separated. Technically, that's not a punishment; it's just an "administrative matter."

Yes, I know that in the past some military members have been punished twice for the same offense. That was in the distant past. Some have been punished for "damage to government property" when they somehow injured themselves, although members of the military are not now and have never been military property.


I didn't say they would be put on trial twice for the same crime. I said they would be punished by the Korean authorities, and when they are done; the US army will punish them (administratively). I can guarantee that does not involve anything pleasant.


No, they won't be punished again by the military. Administrative Punishment is a different critter than Administrative Separation. Administrative Punishment is used in lieu of a court-martial and is not considered a conviction. Administrative separation, once again, is not a punishment; it's a consequence of one of a short list of conditions. One of those conditions is conviction by a civilian court for serious offenses.

FYI:
  • Admin Punishment = "Article 15"/"Captain's Mast"/"Office Hours"
  • Admin Sep = Separation from the Service, aka Discharge. The character of service will be decided based on a matrix in the Department of Defense regulation governing separation from service.
  • Court-martial = One of three levels of United States military tribunal which can convict an accused military member. The court-martial board, depending on the level, can also order the accused to be discharged from the service with a Bad Conduct Discharge or a Dishonorable Discharge, in addition to ordering the accused to be imprisoned.
  • Civil court = A court of competent jurisdiction which is not a US military court.


Look, I don't know--and it doesn't matter to me one way or the other--if you were ever in the US military. Your posts in this thread on the subject are simply incorrect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Smithington



Joined: 14 Dec 2011

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the details as reported are true, the soldiers were idiots and deserve whatever punishment they get. Complete fools who embarrass the 99% of army personnel who obey the law and conduct themselves responsibly in public. Noone should be angrier at them than their own comrades....Having said that, I have found a link to the Helios 'shooting' incident a few years back. The response to the authorities was just a little bit different. (There was a long thread on Daves about it, but I can't locate it.) Anyway, it is an interesting read.

http://www.koreanesl.com/esl.php?board=teacherforum&command=body&no=8426
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
optik404



Joined: 24 Jun 2008

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smithington wrote:
If the details as reported are true, the soldiers were idiots and deserve whatever punishment they get. Complete fools who embarrass the 99% of army personnel who obey the law and conduct themselves responsibly in public. Noone should be angrier at them than their own comrades....Having said that, I have found a link to the Helios 'shooting' incident a few years back. The response to the authorities was just a little bit different. (There was a long thread on Daves about it, but I can't locate it.) Anyway, it is an interesting read.

http://www.koreanesl.com/esl.php?board=teacherforum&command=body&no=8426


So, you're saying the police treat situations unfairly at times? Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smithington wrote:
If the details as reported are true, the soldiers were idiots and deserve whatever punishment they get. Complete fools who embarrass the 99% of army personnel who obey the law and conduct themselves responsibly in public. Noone should be angrier at them than their own comrades....Having said that, I have found a link to the Helios 'shooting' incident a few years back. The response to the authorities was just a little bit different. (There was a long thread on Daves about it, but I can't locate it.) Anyway, it is an interesting read.

http://www.koreanesl.com/esl.php?board=teacherforum&command=body&no=8426


Dude, the guy was firing at random people, led people on a 100 mph car chase through Seoul (endangering lives), and attempted to run over the cop (who still fired a warning shot) before the cop fired.

The other incident was a fight between bouncers and drunks at 3AM.

Of course the response level is going to be completely different. Cops in any nation would fire live ammo at a car attempting to run them over (committing assault with a deadly weapon or even attempted murder). No sane cops would start shooting when it comes to a drunken brawl between bouncers and patrons. And yes, if you start firing a pellet gun at completely random people and flee in a car, expect the cops to give chase.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
newb



Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Location: Korea

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is the outcome of the incident that several soldiers harassing a Korean woman in a subway? Anyone know?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
optik404



Joined: 24 Jun 2008

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

newb wrote:
What is the outcome of the incident that several soldiers harassing a Korean woman in a subway? Anyone know?


I believe it was revealed that the behavior of the soldiers was embellished by either the media or the witnesses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
newb



Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Location: Korea

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

optik404 wrote:
newb wrote:
What is the outcome of the incident that several soldiers harassing a Korean woman in a subway? Anyone know?


I believe it was revealed that the behavior of the soldiers was embellished by either the media or the witnesses.


Then could this "toy" gun shooting incident be the same?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
optik404



Joined: 24 Jun 2008

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

newb wrote:
optik404 wrote:
newb wrote:
What is the outcome of the incident that several soldiers harassing a Korean woman in a subway? Anyone know?


I believe it was revealed that the behavior of the soldiers was embellished by either the media or the witnesses.


Then could this "toy" gun shooting incident be the same?


Doubt it, I saw video of it on the news last night. A bunch of cops were surrounding the car and the driver took off. Also there was a recording from a taxi that showed the car flying past them. Along with all the damage they caused from running in to parked cars.

The soldiers are lucky that they didn't run over a cop or civilian.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rollo



Joined: 10 May 2006
Location: China

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Idiots , extremely lucky some one was not killed. K-cops seem to have handled it well.

The U.S. military is in South Korea because China, Russia, Japan and South Korea want the U.S. military in South Korea.

The day the soldiers leave, the English teachers leave. Thats a no brainer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Airborne9



Joined: 01 Jun 2010

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rollo wrote:


The day the soldiers leave, the English teachers leave. Thats a no brainer.


Yeah of course. If the Soldiers leave SK there is no incentive for Koreans to learn English, therefore no demand for teachers to be here. Who would have thought that the current global language is based on what the US army does in SK.

If any English teachers stay, I suppose they will just have to put up with Kim Jung UN pushing them around since the 30K US troops are the only thing stopping him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International