View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
morningsoju
Joined: 20 Aug 2011 Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:10 pm Post subject: Coming back to Korea within 90 days - do I re-submit docs? |
|
|
Hello,
I have a friend I'm posting for. She finished her contract a few weeks ago and so she went on vacation. She is currently traveling all over Asia and wants to return in about 2 months. She was told by a friend who 'heard' from Immigration that if she came back within 90 days, she would not have to re-submit her docs.
Has anyone else heard this? I thought that once your visa/ARC expired, then you can't renew it and would have to start the whole process over. She surrendered her ARC when she left Korea and never applied for an extension or D10 visa.
I've heard people talk about this '90 day' rule before, so I just wanted to check.
TIA!
Last edited by morningsoju on Thu Jul 04, 2013 12:05 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YTMND
Joined: 16 Jan 2012 Location: You're the man now dog!!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting gambler she is. She doesn't want to ask us before leaving Korea how to get a D-10. She doesn't want to ask us before leaving Korea how to extend her ARC. She doesn't want to ask us before leaving Korea about this 90 day urban legend. She doesn't want to ask another immigration officer before leaving Korea about this 90 day urban legend.
BUT.............
After she leaves (without the pension money by the way, how about severance?), she all of a sudden becomes concerned about re-entering Korea on a working visa which would be canceled. And to make it even more mind boggling she wants a friend to ask us, not immigration who actually makes the decisions. We only go with the wind. What they say is gospel, what we say is gossip.
Is this just a ploy to spread rumors or was this concern sincere?
1. Did she turn in her ARC? If not, not only might she have to submit new documents but she might be fined for not handing it in at the airport when leaving.
2. If her ARC has not expired, then she should be able to re-enter, no problems.
Other than that, it's a gamble.
3. KISS. Keep it simple stupid. In the future, get the D-10.
I think the rule that was being tossed around got lost in translation.
4. After you get your E2 visa, you have 90 days to enter. It doesn't mean if you already had one you have 90 more days to re-enter. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
^^^^ Incorrect....
IF
she intends to return and obtains a new (E2) visa/visa confirmation number within 90 days of her departure from Korea on a previous E2
PROVIDED
her previous contract has expired and she has no immigration violations in her file
Then...
a) Will she need to submit new docs to immigration for issuance of a new visa confirmation number = no, not for a hagwon job and probably yes for a PS position (private hire).
b) Will she have to submit new docs for issuance of a NOA for a PS position = yes.
c) Will she have to submit new docs to an employer/recruiter for purposes of getting a job offer = maybe.
Immigration sets the minimum requirements
BUT
An employer is allowed to ask for/demand more (as in new documents) as a condition/precondition of employment if they so desire.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YTMND
Joined: 16 Jan 2012 Location: You're the man now dog!!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
a) Will she need to submit new docs to immigration for issuance of a new visa confirmation number = no, not for a hagwon job.
b) Will she have to submit new docs for issuance of a NOA for a PS position = yes. |
If you can do it for hagwons but not public school jobs, then can't you get a D-10? Would you then be allowed to bypass the document stage for public schools?
It seems strange that they would allow hagwons to "cheat" the system but not public schools. However, the other part in your post mentions employer. Maybe it is the public schools who want new documents, not immigration. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
YTMND wrote: |
Quote: |
a) Will she need to submit new docs to immigration for issuance of a new visa confirmation number = no, not for a hagwon job.
b) Will she have to submit new docs for issuance of a NOA for a PS position = yes. |
If you can do it for hagwons but not public school jobs, then can't you get a D-10? Would you then be allowed to bypass the document stage for public schools?
It seems strange that they would allow hagwons to "cheat" the system but not public schools. However, the other part in your post mentions employer. Maybe it is the public schools who want new documents, not immigration. |
Public schools are an employer requirement and not an immigration one.
There is no "cheat".
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YTMND
Joined: 16 Jan 2012 Location: You're the man now dog!!
|
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Public schools are an employer requirement and not an immigration one.
There is no "cheat". |
Yes, I know that, but if a teacher has to get documents for the public schools (employer) and don't have to for a hagwon (employer), then it seems like there are less hoops to go through.
Who makes the decision to bypass this? It seems like maybe the public school and not immigration.
As teachers, we are trying to satisfy immigration rules but if what you are saying is true then maybe it would be better for this person to get a hagwon job and then quit and transfer to a public school if that is what they want.
If they did this, then they probably wouldn't need new docs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, they would.
PS jobs, as a matter of policy, require new docs from all new (E2) hires regardless of your previous visa status or length of sojourn in the country.
It is an employer requirement and not an immigration one.
They are a little less fussy on F2,4,5,6 employees provided the new hire meets the MOE requirements for registration.
And there have always been more hoops to jump through for a PS job.
I can't remember the last time a hagwon asked me (or anyone I know) for letters of reference, proof of prior experience, certificates of employment, etc.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
morningsoju
Joined: 20 Aug 2011 Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, she's not worried at all. She said she heard other teachers say this also. She said she went to the Immigration office and obtained copies of her Apostilled CRC and diploma, and when she came back, she would just use those. She also mentioned that since she did not go back home, she would not need new docs.
I did a search and it looks like she was misinformed or there was some miscommunication.
That's too bad for her  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
morningsoju
Joined: 20 Aug 2011 Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, scratch that -- now I heard from a few other people that they knew about the 90 day rule. They said even if your visa expired, you have 90 days to sign with another school. Once you sign with the new school, they can issue you a new VIN without submitting new documents since your information is still in the database.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wildbore
Joined: 17 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, THE REGULATIONS say you can get a new visa issuance number without submission of new documents within 90 days. It's not a myth, there's a notice called "E-2 visa improvement notice" on the "hikorea" immigration website from back in 2011 that talks about it. The same notice that brought in the FBI checks brought in this change as well.
When I actually tried to do this myself, some old stupid immigration officer just ignored the regulation and rejected my visa issuance number anyways.
It is in the law, but there are ALOT of people who are as smart as a brick working at immigration. Don't count on it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
morningsoju
Joined: 20 Aug 2011 Location: Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WOW. Now I'm extremely confused. So this is actually the LAW, but Immigration still rejects the visa in this situation?
I don't get it  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wildbore
Joined: 17 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
morningsoju wrote: |
WOW. Now I'm extremely confused. So this is actually the LAW, but Immigration still rejects the visa in this situation?
I don't get it  |
Korean bureaucracy = incompetent. It was suppose to eliminate redundancy, by decreasing paperwork for those who left Korea for only a short time. All it did was create more confusion, because some officers heard about the change, and some didn't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|