Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Noam Chomsky Rejects 9-11 Alternative Theories
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yo, Steels! One of the crackpot "theories" is that the government let the attacks happen on purpose.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 12:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
Yo, Steels! One of the crackpot "theories" is that the government let the attacks happen on purpose.


That's the most credible theory, considering that its the simplest. It kind of clashes with the cover-up allegations, though, because there would be very little to cover-up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

None of the crackpot theories is credible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
Yo, Steels! One of the crackpot "theories" is that the government let the attacks happen on purpose.


I'm ambivalent on LIHOP. I don't have enough info one way or the other to prove or discredit it.

It certainly doesn't take very much to pull it off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually it does. "The government" isn't just one big monolith, with all of its members--including quite a number of military and police--marching in lock-step. "The government let it happen" theory is beneath stupid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
Actually it does. "The government" isn't just one big monolith, with all of its members--including quite a number of military and police--marching in lock-step. "The government let it happen" theory is beneath stupid.


I'd imagine that one could bury/ignore the report in the bureacratic muck allowing for the attack to potentially happen (though not bettin 100% on its success). As the government tends to miss and muck up a fair amount of stuff anyway.

But I'm not a strong supporter of LIHOP either way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheUrbanMyth



Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
Actually it does. "The government" isn't just one big monolith, with all of its members--including quite a number of military and police--marching in lock-step. "The government let it happen" theory is beneath stupid.



Completely agree. An "allowed" attack with the subsequent cover-up would of necessity have dozens if not hundreds of people in the know. More than a decade on...nobody has blown the whistle or said a word. Instead we have a number of crackpots blabbing on and on about how they "KNOW" what happened...as if they were there and had privy inside information.

It's just a bunch of nobodies trying to make themselves seem important. And the more insignificant they are in real life...the louder and longer they will yell and cling to their private fantasy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not so sure it would take THAT much to let it happen on purpose. A report would probably get sent up the stream at NSA/DoD/FBI/CIA/State. There are probably hundreds or thousands of reports a year about alleged threats. Those agencies probably prioritize some and some inevitably get dismissed as 'not credible' or put on the back burner. I don't think it would take hundreds of people to take a report about an alleged plot and bury it in the muck, at least to the point of giving it a fair chance to succeed (the conspirators would likely understand that there would always be a chance that local law enforcement or other investigations would uncover and halt it).

But again, I don't believe that is what happened, however I don't see the kind of overwhelming evidence to completely rule it out like Controlled Demolition, which might was well be on the same level of "Jerry Bruckheimer accidentally blew up the WTC while filming his latest movie" as a conspiracy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wintermute



Joined: 01 Oct 2007

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steelrails wrote:
I may lack sufficient information to know whether or not the government let the attack happen on purpose, I do however, have sufficient information to rule out controlled demolition and other "made it happen" theories.


That, exactly, is the point I am arguing against; I don't believe you do!

Quote:
-I don't even have to. I'm not out here to prove the government's story 100%. I AM here to discredit the crackpot theories out there, and you just need basic logic, fact-checking, and critical thinking to do that.


This must be the third time: what theories? They are "out there", so it should be a simple matter to link to them. The reason I don't believe you "have sufficient information to rule out controlled demolition and other 'made it happen' theories ", is because in this whole thread, you have made absolutely no effort to relate your arguments to anything "out there".

I might believe that claim if you phrased your efforts outwards at real theories and arguments, instead of a vague generalization of "Controlled Demolition Theories" the definition of which is known only to you.

That is why your claim to be able to comprehensively rule out controlled demolition is absurd, when all you've presented is your opinion of the validity of your idea of what controlled demolition theories are.


Quote:
You do realize that I could put to together a clip featuring music and edited clips and make it look like the whole thing was a conspiracy by Jay-Z, right? "Prior to 2001, Jay-Z was XsnipX Mastermind of 9/11. It's all out there. You just have to open your eyes man. Stop assuming, start questioning. Don't believe the government lies. Connect the dots. It's all supported in journals like Critical Reform for America's People.


Amusing, but complicated and secret conspiracies for a few to profit at the expense of the many happen all the time!.

The desire to investigate and expose them is a worthy goal. We should focus improving techniques and tools to do so. By all means, call out bad logic, hidden agendas etc. That just gets us closer to the truth. But summary judgements based on opinions but masquerading as fact work against that goal by seeking to shut down lines of investigation without cause.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wintermute



Joined: 01 Oct 2007

PostPosted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
Actually it does. "The government" isn't just one big monolith, with all of its members--including quite a number of military and police--marching in lock-step. "The government let it happen" theory is beneath stupid.


But wouldn't the fact that it "isn't just one big monolith", make it easier to pull off, not harder?

Would it help to think of it as "elements of the government let it happen"?
Back to top
View user's profile