Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The smoking ban - it's actually working.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KimchiNinja wrote:
I don't follow politics, did Koreans vote for this smoking ban?

Wouldn't that require having a democracy? Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

atwood wrote:
KimchiNinja wrote:
I don't follow politics, did Koreans vote for this smoking ban?

Wouldn't that require having a democracy? Very Happy


In other words change happened, but not thru voting. Had they employed voting, nothing would have happened. Just like nothing will happen in the USA with voting.

Done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KimchiNinja wrote:
atwood wrote:
KimchiNinja wrote:
I don't follow politics, did Koreans vote for this smoking ban?

Wouldn't that require having a democracy? Very Happy


In other words change happened, but not thru voting. Had they employed voting, nothing would have happened. Just like nothing will happen in the USA with voting.

Done.

Not done since you never got started.

Legislators and candidates who support tobacco tax increases gain support from voters from both parties. Polling in more than ten states shows that, by at least a two-to-one margin, voters indicated that they would be more likely (rather than less likely) to support a candidate who backed an increase in the tobacco tax.

Korea is not the U.S. Just ask Tatsuya Kato.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

atwood wrote:

Your tax argument, as it has been from the beginning, is nonsense. Local school districts do not "rely on it."


http://thenotebook.org/blog/147511/without-cigarette-tax-philadelphia-schools-weigh-drastic-options

http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/education/69972-update-pa-house-passes-cigarette-tax-for-philly-schools-

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/cigarette-tax-increase-on-missouri-ballot-for-third-time/article_fe244079-ee28-543a-92a1-e6e2be5c2da5.html

http://www.sj-r.com/x871008862/-1-per-pack-cigarette-tax-hike-falling-short-of-projections?zc_p=0#axzz2XHRaTk6m

And as we've argued before- The best answer to the issue of the public health issue of smoking is public health policies and treatment. NOT restaurant bans and taxes.

May I ask what the proper number of smokers and levels of taxation are? Is your goal to reduce the number of smokers? How do you plan to replace the shortfalls in the budget? Tax something else into oblivion?

Is there anything more illogical than funding your schools with an addictive substance that poses health dangers that you are also trying to reduce consumption of? Isn't that the very definition of insanity?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KimchiNinja



Joined: 01 May 2012
Location: Gangnam

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meh, the whole thing just seems rather silly, like they are just copying the West so that Seoul can be viewed as a "modern city". Not like they actually care about health. There are much more important things to ban if they actually care about health.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
atwood



Joined: 26 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 2:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steelrails wrote:
atwood wrote:

Your tax argument, as it has been from the beginning, is nonsense. Local school districts do not "rely on it."


http://thenotebook.org/blog/147511/without-cigarette-tax-philadelphia-schools-weigh-drastic-options

http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/education/69972-update-pa-house-passes-cigarette-tax-for-philly-schools-

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/cigarette-tax-increase-on-missouri-ballot-for-third-time/article_fe244079-ee28-543a-92a1-e6e2be5c2da5.html

http://www.sj-r.com/x871008862/-1-per-pack-cigarette-tax-hike-falling-short-of-projections?zc_p=0#axzz2XHRaTk6m

And as we've argued before- The best answer to the issue of the public health issue of smoking is public health policies and treatment. NOT restaurant bans and taxes.

May I ask what the proper number of smokers and levels of taxation are? Is your goal to reduce the number of smokers? How do you plan to replace the shortfalls in the budget? Tax something else into oblivion?

Is there anything more illogical than funding your schools with an addictive substance that poses health dangers that you are also trying to reduce consumption of? Isn't that the very definition of insanity?

Dude, your first link is to a publication by the Philadelphia public school teachers, not exactly an unbiased source. And there were certainly other options than the ones they put forward.

But the tax passed and supposedly 1000 jobs were saved thanks to smokers like yourself. But they could just have as easily raised property taxes if the people of Philadelphia were so concerned with their children's educations.

As for Illinois:
Quote:
Despite losing out on some cigarette tax revenue, the School Infrastructure Fund will be better off this year than in previous years because of legislation signed into law earlier this month. Senate Bill 1884 designates a one-time lump sum of $92 million of the state’s gaming fund to school capital projects and about $64.4 million each following year.


So they don't have to "rely" on cigarette taxes.

Who is this we you keep referring to, you presumptuous pinhead? The only one making such arguments is yourself. And YOU, not we, are the best argument against your argument. Surely you've been educated to the health risks associated with smoking, "treatment" is available to you, and yet you continue to smoke.

You're not interested in quitting smoking--your I should be able to smoke in bars if I want to argument proves that--so what good would this "treatment" do anyway? It's just a smoke screen from a smoker who wants his smokes where he wants them when he wants them on the cheap.

There's nothing illogical about "sin" taxes such as the ones on cigarettes. They make quite good sense. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smoking rates by year:

http://www.segye.com/content/image/2011/07/20/20110720003155_0.jpg

For the men it's still quite high, same as Canada in the mid-80s.

http://www.tobaccoreport.ca/2012/Images/Figures/2012_Figure_1-1.JPG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Page 8 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International