|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Alias77
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 8:13 am Post subject: Severance Shock |
|
|
I had an absolutely awful experience today that has left me in shock, to say the least, regarding my severance. I would like any advice that might help although I'm not sure anything can be done.
The story in summary:
I've worked for the same large, well-known company for the last 4 years in an after-school program. During the third year, a new manager replaced the program founder. Her English skills were and still are terrible, which caused great friction in addition to excessive micro-management. At the end of the third year, we parted ways because she failed to renew numerous contracts through the yearly bid and I was out of a job.
A few weeks later, she called and presented me with an offer of increased salary for an emergency situation in a far away school where the teacher had walked off the job. I accepted. Within a few days, we met the principal and afterward sat down to sign the contract. It was the same standard company contract and I checked all the usual stuff that any veteran teacher would look for, including severance payment. It was all in the contract. However, the first week had been worked by the other teacher that quit and the matter of completing the contract regarding a full year was discussed on the spot. I am 100% convinced that she said it was not a problem and that she explained that the company had said "ok, no problem" because it was only a week. We talked at length and she said that the circumstances were understood and that the company would make an exception. So, all the conditions were right and I was getting a salary increase for distance and the emergency need for a trustworthy teacher. I trusted her and the company after a long relationship without incident.
Today, she came on the final day of the contract to say goodbye and said, "Sorry about the severance. We cannot give it to you, as you remember we discussed." It made me ill on the spot. I immediately challenged her, politely of course, to say that she had indeed guaranteed it. Why would I sign a contract without severance? We argued in a very awkward and stressful way for about 45 minutes without resolution. I have put up with some awful garbage in the last 6 months, including a fight over winter vacation which ended up causing me to miss my grandmother's funeral, and still held on because I wanted the severance payment. I expected it. She declared that she had explained it wasn't possible before I signed the contract. I maintained that she had said the exact opposite.
It became clear through the argument that her mangled English, like pronouncing "can't" without a "t", was as largely at fault as her terrible interpersonal skills. Although, I strongly believe there is also something wrong with her mind. I now recall, in light of this, that my former Korean co-teacher had said that she got angry with this same manager for flipping on promises and plans that they had discussed and agreed to in Korean. My co-worker said that the manager had "changed the story later on".
Whatever her original explanation was, one year ago, the contract language included a clause for severance and I worked in good faith to complete the contract based on the verbal guarantee and belief the situation was resolved. Then, today I find out that because I am short a week because of the teacher that quit after his first week, I am not eligible per company policy and her mangled English assurance was either false, unsubstantiated, or she doesn't know what she told me.
I had my wife call her boss and explain, to which he expressed sympathy, but he had checked with the company legal team which said they are not liable. He said that she had explained to him that I accepted the contract without severance.
I am absolutely floored by these events, and of course, financially injured because of payment I was anticipating. This woman is the nexus of the confusion between myself and the upper management and the company. She has wormed around in the middle and left both the company and myself at odds. The upper management heard one story and I heard another. I just wish I had known earllier, because I would have quit long ago.
I am sorry for the length of the story. I know my principal mistake was accepting her verbal assurance, but after the long established positive relationship I had with the company, I never expected to be treated like this. So, I would appreciate any pro-active thoughts anyone has about this ridiculously terrible situation.
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toonchoon

Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've heard similar stories over the years, and this isn't an isolated incident. Truly a terrible experience. Now, perhaps contact the Seoul Global Center - they have a lawyer there that can offer some insight and may let you know if you have a case.
Either way, this was one huge learning experience - and an expensive one, too. I've had a few of those in Korea, though nothing to this extent. This proves that we need everything in writing in both Korean & English, and that we need to go over the contracts before we sign. The whole "can / can't" thing is all too common; Koreans say can when they mean to say can't while smiling - it's a cultural thing + pronunciation problem, which results in false perceptions.
Good luck figuring it all out! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
laynamarya
Joined: 01 Jan 2010 Location: Gwangjin-gu
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A friend of mine went through something very similar. In the end, she called the labor board, who told her that anything less than 365 days meant no severance. She worked 363, I believe. The labor board said all she could do was hire a lawyer, and even then she'd probably lose the case.
I wish I had a more optimistic story. I don't think you can win this one, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guajiro
Joined: 04 Dec 2008
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
laynamarya wrote: |
A friend of mine went through something very similar. In the end, she called the labor board, who told her that anything less than 365 days meant no severance. She worked 363, I believe. The labor board said all she could do was hire a lawyer, and even then she'd probably lose the case.
I wish I had a more optimistic story. I don't think you can win this one, though. |
My boss at my first job told me at the end of the contract I wouldn't get severance because a missed a week due to requiring surgery. I said I was going to call the labour board and ask if that was indeed the law. He then said that I had misunderstood, and that no, he was going to give me prorated severance. He said he already called the relevant government office and that's what they had advised. I took the prorated severance, though I don't know if he actually called anyone. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alias77
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interestingly, out of the 5 years I've worked after-school programs, they never have a 365 day schedule. I have documented proof that we often work on average only 50 weeks due to any number of reasons that do not include vaction, from visa runs to the school's choice of starting and ending dates, or even delays for illegal, under-the-table remodelling that the school demands for awarding the contract. Sometimes the contract dates list a sort of yearly start to end but others do not. Just like everything else in this business, it's all unstable. I think, because in previous years that I was handed a full severance for contract completion for less than 52 calendar weeks, it should establish a precedent in my favor. It probably would in the west, but the legal system is broken here too. It's one of the few arguments I have.
Also, I have one more important question to throw out there:
Anyone know the legality of asking native teachers to sign documents entirely printed in Korean without explanation?
Last edited by Alias77 on Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cave Dweller
Joined: 17 Aug 2014 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It was smart and devious of this woman to tell you this after the contract was completed. If not, I would have advised to walk off your job early.
Unfortunately when it comes to greedy dragons, hitting them in the pocket book is all they understand. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toonchoon

Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alias77 wrote: |
Also, I have one more important question to throw out there:
Anyone know the legality of asking native teachers to sign documents entirely printed in Korean without explanation? |
Probably legal. It's up to us to demand an English version, and it seems schools only provide the English-version contract for OUR convenience, not theirs. The contracts I've signed in Korea all said the Korean language contract was the valid, legally binding one, and that the English language contract was offered out of convenience to the teacher. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
creeper1
Joined: 30 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In a situation like this all you can do is name and shame.
otherwise she will be getting away with this Scot free. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
watergirl
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Location: Ansan, south korea
|
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi~
You might have one more strategy.. Did the principal sign your contract at immigration? And does the contract say you will get severance?
You can threaten to talk to the school who does not want any hassles, and could maybe get angry w. the company and tell them to pay you.
Worth a try anyways. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chaparrastique
Joined: 01 Jan 2014
|
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
watergirl wrote: |
Did the principal sign your contract at immigration? And does the contract say you will get severance? |
Exactly. Don't give up on this too soon. First step, consult the labor board.
Quote: |
as her terrible interpersonal skills. Although, I strongly believe there is also something wrong with her mind. |
Sounds familiar. About one in five hogwon bosses are basically evil and get a thrill out of tricking and abusing FT's. Shafting other people is practically a national sport in this country. This mentality is due to a lack of empathy, which is due to a personality disorder (look up "narcissistic personality disorder/ narcissist").
Toonchoon wrote: |
Koreans say can when they mean to say can't while smiling |
Its because of their insistence on the awful American pronunciation whereby "can" sounds indistinguishable to "can't" (and both sound like a cat being put through a meat grinder). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Troglodyte

Joined: 06 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
toonchoon wrote: |
Alias77 wrote: |
Also, I have one more important question to throw out there:
Anyone know the legality of asking native teachers to sign documents entirely printed in Korean without explanation? |
Probably legal. It's up to us to demand an English version, and it seems schools only provide the English-version contract for OUR convenience, not theirs. The contracts I've signed in Korea all said the Korean language contract was the valid, legally binding one, and that the English language contract was offered out of convenience to the teacher. |
It's neither legal nor illegal. It's something that you would have to settle in court. Just because a contract is on paper and you sign it, doesn't mean that it's binding. If you can demonstrate that you were either deceived or likely deceived, the court may rule in your favor and consider that the contract should be for a full 12 months. Generally speaking, if you get someone to sign a contract, you are supposed to make sure that they know what the contract says. So, if a person is illiterate (which many foreigners are when it comes to reading Korean) the other person (your employer) is expected to make sure you know what you're signing. Even verbal agreements can be legally binding, they are just harder to prove. In your case, you might be able to prove/convince the court that you can't read Korean. Since working 1 week short of a year would mean a large decrease in your pay, it would seem odd that you would have willingly and knowingly signed it.
Another point to add. If your contact says "severance pay" in English, depending on how it's written into the contract, you will likely be able to argue that even if you didn't do 12 full months, you are still entitled to it. Calling it "severance pay" is actually misleading and an incorrect translation. For Koreans, that money is a sort of pension (since most would traditionally work at a company for decades until retirement). Since it's a matter of law, this severance-pension doesn't need to be in a contract. Add it in, could (depending on wording) imply that it's a job benefit. So why would someone knowingly sign a contract which includes a bonus (which, again depending on wording, is not obligatory if the contract is less than a year) if another section of the contract would prohibit the collection of the bonus straight off the bat. To most people (e.g. judges) it would suggest deception.
In any case, your best option is to simply go to the LB and file a complaint. The school might resolve the problem simply to clear their record at the LB. Otherwise, you'll have to take it to court. But then again, maybe the notice from a law office informing the school of your intent to pursue the matter will also prompt them to pay up and to avoid a legal record if the judge finds in your favor. (It wouldn't be the first time someone used that strategy - with success.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alongway
Joined: 02 Jan 2012
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
creeper1 wrote: |
In a situation like this all you can do is name and shame.
otherwise she will be getting away with this Scot free. |
Break the law, yes, excellent advise
Quote: |
My boss at my first job told me at the end of the contract I wouldn't get severance because a missed a week due to requiring surgery. I said I was going to call the labour board and ask if that was indeed the law. He then said that I had misunderstood, and that no, he was going to give me prorated severance. He said he already called the relevant government office and that's what they had advised. I took the prorated severance, though I don't know if he actually called anyone. |
Severance is based on the start and end day of your contract. You should always sign a contract that runs from the day you are starting to the day before the same day next year. That's your year. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furtakk
Joined: 02 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
The only way I can see you getting out of it is if it's considered a continuation of contract. I don't know how contracts work at your AS company, but if you make contracts with them directly (not just the PS) it may be considered a continuation of your previous 5 years with the same company. I think it wouldn't matter if you worked a full calender year at that particular school if you were contracted to the same company for 5+ years. The labor board might consider that first week 'vacation' if spun the right way. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alias77
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks to all who have contributed.
Quote: |
In any case, your best option is to simply go to the LB and file a complaint. The school might resolve the problem simply to clear their record at the LB. Otherwise, you'll have to take it to court. But then again, maybe the notice from a law office informing the school of your intent to pursue the matter will also prompt them to pay up and to avoid a legal record if the judge finds in your favor. (It wouldn't be the first time someone used that strategy - with success.)
|
Troglodyte, or anyone else who knows, I am very interested to know how to involve the school. I am confused as to whether the school is notified by me before going to the labor board or whether I should simply name them when I file my complaint. The school may have documentation, but I doubt that they would simply copy it for my benefit.
The head manager of the after-school program informed me today, after checking with the HR dept, that they are refusing to pay. So I will be going to the labor board immediately. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fusionbarnone
Joined: 31 May 2004
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alias77
Get the contact number for your company's senior manager.
Go to immigration and explain your company said you cannot have severance pay because of a visa issue.
You will tell all staff members at immigration who speak to you until you get their big boss situated at the back of the room.
Explain the same thing to him/her and give him/her the contact number for the big boss at your school.
Wait and see what happens, your money should be in your account before you get home. Hopefully.
If anyone later asks, "Misunderstandings are a two way street" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|