|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2015 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
atwood wrote: |
If you're from the U.S. and have a bank account there, you could do far worse than putting the money in Vanguard's Total Stock Market Index, either the mutual fund or ETF version. |
Yep, that would be the most prudent thing to do. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lunar Groove Gardener
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Location: 1987 Subaru
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If at the start of a longer-view overall for investing in your future, you might consider 3 possibilities for where you'll put your money over the coming years:
1. figuring out a stocks/bonds/indexes portfolio via extensive research and self-education, or trusting in the choices of a broker/portfolio manager.
2. considering if income property interests you and if there is an area where you might invest in it and have access to management and other necessary services (accountant/lawyer/repairs/realtors)
3. consider at what level you'll invest in yourself over the coming years:
a. do you want to open a shop/restaurant/bar
b. do you want to increase your marketable skills via education
c. is there a project that you wish to push forward through paying others
to help you get it moving
4. do you want to travel, or have other experiences which will be an investment in your own 'vision' of things
All of these are 'long view' strategies with specific ideas in mind when selecting them. If mastering stocks is of interest, this cash will get you started. Similarly with either real estate, or starting a business, or investing in personal growth/education/travel.
This is where the fun starts.
I chose to emphasize income properties 10 years ago. It is not without its downside, but it has been a good fit for me. I can see it, sell it, and some day, either live in it, or use the income to live wherever for however long.
Best of luck. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PigeonFart
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2015 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="ricochet"]i'd invest it 1 dollar at a time...[/quote]
Exactly! Invest $1 dollar in 10,000 different companies! ha ha |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
2i2dk1ny2i3
Joined: 26 Jun 2011
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
buy ANYTHING that is a Chinese copmany stock that seems like a good investment:
i.e. Baidu, Alibaba (this site seemed like a scam but it cleaned up a lot of the "fake" sellers and is currently a juggernaut)
there are certain Korean companies too that are good investments and could possibly be good investments |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atwood
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
2i2dk1ny2i3 wrote: |
buy ANYTHING that is a Chinese copmany stock that seems like a good investment:
i.e. Baidu, Alibaba (this site seemed like a scam but it cleaned up a lot of the "fake" sellers and is currently a juggernaut)
there are certain Korean companies too that are good investments and could possibly be good investments |
What do you consider a fair price for those stocks? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toonchoon

Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I was an American, I'd open up various bank accounts in the USA and deposit that money in order to trigger bank bonuses - anywhere between $50 for the Discover Checking Account to $300 on the Chase checking account. That's the no-risk way of investing.
$500 in bank bonuses so far this year, and it's only the beginning of March. Planning on $1200 for the year. Not a bad return.
And then there's the free big $$ stuff from the bank, but that requires one to actually have good credit in the States, and like .05% of American's living in Seoul seem to qualify for that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
happyinhenan
Joined: 01 Feb 2015
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Amazing - no posts about buying/hoarding gold. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PRagic

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@ Atwood
Avery familiar with the lit. But read deeper and you'll see that they're describing uber high yield chasing behavior that can overbuild exposure to certain sectors (e.g. utilities). Also, the long term strategy is not to buy with a look to sell any given fund in the short to hear long term, so gains to prices become virtually irrelevant (I say virtually because you wouldn't want to get clobbered in a monster market crash).
If you're looking to build and PROTECT wealth, and if you diversify while paying attention to alpha and beta stats, thereby attempting to lower risk while settling for modest (e.g. 4.5-7.5%) returns, dividend paying funds can be a justifiable strategy. And while, yes, you do pay taxes on the dividends, you pay that once, after which proceeds can be reinvested. Later on down the road when you draw income from the accounts, you'll have already paid those taxes.
At any rate, like most investment strategies, you can find arguments to support just about any strategy. Personally, I like to keep us diversified (stocks, funds, property), protected as much as possible, and continually building via regular installments of new capital and reinvested income. Everyone I know with a decent amount of money pretty much looks to do the same. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
atwood
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PRagic wrote: |
@ Atwood
Avery familiar with the lit. But read deeper and you'll see that they're describing uber high yield chasing behavior that can overbuild exposure to certain sectors (e.g. utilities). Also, the long term strategy is not to buy with a look to sell any given fund in the short to hear long term, so gains to prices become virtually irrelevant (I say virtually because you wouldn't want to get clobbered in a monster market crash).
If you're looking to build and PROTECT wealth, and if you diversify while paying attention to alpha and beta stats, thereby attempting to lower risk while settling for modest (e.g. 4.5-7.5%) returns, dividend paying funds can be a justifiable strategy. And while, yes, you do pay taxes on the dividends, you pay that once, after which proceeds can be reinvested. Later on down the road when you draw income from the accounts, you'll have already paid those taxes.
At any rate, like most investment strategies, you can find arguments to support just about any strategy. Personally, I like to keep us diversified (stocks, funds, property), protected as much as possible, and continually building via regular installments of new capital and reinvested income. Everyone I know with a decent amount of money pretty much looks to do the same. |
If you were truly familiar with the "lit" then you'd know a total return strategy is more effective than dividend paying funds. The figures don't lie.
Everyone you know doing the same isn't much of an argument. I'd rather consult experts in the field of investment.
Good luck! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PRagic

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I mentioned a DIVERSIFIED, balanced strategy, not putting one's eggs all in one investment basket. Our investments already annually generate more than many university instructors make in a year here and I'm still in my 40s. Good luck? Maybe. Not here to have a pissing contest. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PRagic

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2015 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And don't forget that a LOT of actively managed funds are in fact deploying a total return strategy to boot anyway. In the end, we're pretty much on the same sheet of music, just arguing semantics. If you're making money and protecting what you have, hats off to ya! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|