Korean Job Discussion Forums

[trueblue]

This seems to provide description to what Neo-liberalism may actually be.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/from_marxismcommunism_to_postmodern_liberal_fascism.html





November 7, 2015
From Marxism/Communism to Post-Modern Liberal Fascism
By Mark Musser
The USSR died an ugly death in the 1990s. Yet, such an ugly political collapse proved to be very opportunistic for many communist leaders throughout the Soviet Union who hated the Marxist ideology that actually placed some restrictions on their behavior. Many of them privatized state companies to themselves and thus became the biggest mafia the world has ever seen. Putin, as a former KGB spymaster, is now in relative control of this mafia in spite of all the clans competing with one another from the Ukrainian Crimea to the Russian Far East.

As has been recently demonstrated on a grand scale in Ukraine, Russia is a strong geopolitical player in world events today, but it’s very real threat is not Bolshevik in nature. While President Reagan’s anti-Communist drive is now in the process of being reversed in Eastern Europe, the Russians are not coming back with more Marxism, but with a dark and shadowy mafia lawlessness that is being hidden under Russian Orthodox clouds of incense and undergirded by a geopolitical ideology that is far more reminiscent of fascism than communism.



Classic Marxism was based on humanistic social science and economics, industrialism, and state ownership of the means of production, which few leftists today take seriously. Even China today is a mixture of capitalism and communism. What the Left propagates today is not state ownership of companies, but rather the strict regulation of them instead. This, however, has not made the business community any better. It has, in fact, resulted in an unholy corporatist alliance, if not fascist wedding, between big business and big government in both Europe and North America.

In other words, in the same way that Germany finally abandoned their leftist forefather, Karl Marx, in the 1920s and 30s for fascism, many leftists today have done likewise by adopting postmodernism, multiculturalism, and environmentalism. Through heavy regulation, businesses are effectively collectivized or nationalized in the name of post-modern multicultural and environmental ideals, which seldom can stand under the scrutiny of common sense, sound judgment or reason.

Germany’s communist prophet, Karl Marx (1818-1883), believed he had stringently analyzed all of the political and social pitfalls of Industrial Capitalism. He was therefore convinced that capitalism would eventually produce its own negation through the rise of the socialist proletariat. Incredibly, Marx believed this would ultimately usher in a classless utopia of eschatological humanism free from worker oppression and the division of labor that alienates one man from another. Due to the dialectical laws of social change and historical evolution, Marx believed modern industry and technology would advance so much that class society will become obsolete in the future communist eschaton of proletarian freedom.

Marx’s social scientific prophecy, of course, did not materialize. Worse, what did arise was an extremely repressive Soviet Union and Communist China that produced an apocalyptic body count that became increasingly difficult to defend intellectually throughout the 20th century. In his book Explaining Post-Modernism, Dr. Stephen Hicks points out this placed the Left in a great political bind, “Confronted by the continuing flourishing of capitalism and the brutality of socialism, they could either go with the evidence or reject their deeply cherished ideals -- or stick with their ideals, and attack the whole idea that evidence and logic matter.” As such, rather than admit they were wrong, the Left, of course, adopted postmodern madness as its new political *beep*.

Hicks then goes on to argue that in the same way the great German master Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) limited reason in the late 1700s in order to save religion, in the 20th century, shockingly enough, it was Nazi philosopher Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) who became a “godsend” for the Left by advocating an existentialist philosophy that valued existence, nature, and emotion over reason. Industrial progress and the communist utopia have thus been replaced with a view of history that is rooted in the existential and/or political realities of everyday life and Nature rather than upon a humanistic rationalism that strives to rise above both.

Heidegger’s fascist philosophy became the political bridge between National Socialism and postmodern multiculturalism. Multiculturalism celebrates the indigenous or ethnic differences against the background of an amorphous and homogenous Global Capitalism where cultural identity is presumed lost and/or extinct. Heidegger deconstructed the successes of western capitalism by delegitimizing it as inherently artificial, inauthentic, and alien to the indigenous countries in which it was exported into. Heidegger criticized capitalistic Western values that allegedly worshiped reason, global technology, and money as alien to German culture rooted in the German soil.

Heidegger originally considered such Western excesses as an international “Jewification” of society. Heidegger rejected the universal values of the Judeo-Christian worldview wedded to western capitalism as a forced ethic contrary to the existential sentiments of Germany. Such overarching Western values alien to the fatherland thus need to be eradicated from Germany. This explains why Heidegger was even involved in book burning bonfires during the early years of National Socialism.

After World War II, the Left not only quickly forgave Heidegger’s Nazi past, but they rehabilitated him by developing his existential deconstructionism into a multipronged attack against Western capitalism. This was accomplished by promoting a global multiculturalism steeped in identity politics that overemphasized many other political concerns beyond the restrictions of Marxian class warfare to include environmentalism, racism, ethnicity, and gender where many groups felt artificially repressed by industrial capitalism and its universal Judeo-Christian ethic. In so doing, Heidegger’s existentialism also downgraded the importance of the intellect in the face of other existential facets of life like willpower, emotion, and natural existence itself, particularly with regard to one’s own “local only’ culture and environment.

It is here where the modern Left made its transition away from communism into a postmodern existentialism. Dr. Hicks strongly argues that postmodernism is rooted in the Counter Enlightenment movement featuring German superstars such as Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, and Heidegger. According to Hicks, postmodernism favors subjectivity over objectivity, the inadequacy of language to communicate over reason and truth, various collective multicultural groupings over individual identity and autonomy, willpower over realistic experience rooted in rational analysis, communalism and solidarity over individualism in values, markets and politics, and finally, suspicion, if not hostility, toward science and technology.

As such, the postmodern critique of capitalism has replaced the original Marxian critique of capitalism. The universalism of Marxian socialism has been exchanged with identity politics mixed in with an inverse racism that emphasizes white guilt in particular over its colonial and capitalist sins. International communism thus was converted into a multicultural form of modern fascism that accentuates cultural dissimilarities. Such sentiments also stand very opposed to the classical American melting pot based on the universal values of the Judeo-Christian tradition.

Thus Heidegger’s philosophy has been twisted into a leftist deconstruction program in order to undermine the dominance of Western classical liberalism that originally extolled the virtues of individual liberty, free markets, religious freedom, and a democratic republican form of government. The ever-increasing madness of the postmodern age where the political left and right continually talk past each other in America is hardly surprising. However, continuing to confuse Marxism with postmodernism will not clear the air, but only cloud up the issues even further. In short, postmodernism means Post-Marxism.



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/11/from_marxismcommunism_to_postmodern_liberal_fascism.html#ixzz3qvQK51Mo
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

[Leon]

I feel like the 'left' as a term has been abused and stretched to mean people we don't like/disagree with for x,y,z. True blue when can we expect your published American Thinker article?

[Swartz]

Yeah, trueblue, you should stop reading the American Thinker. You are reading pure disinformation. Just so much wrong with this one, too much obvious deception that I finally had to peek at the American Thinker’s wiki page. Sure enough, it’s run by two dual-citizens named Lifton and Lasky. A few issues:

1) No right-thinking conservative (except one who reads or is involved in the creation of controlled opposition/neocon propaganda) would trash Russia like that. Russia under communism and during the 90s was repeatedly ransacked by oligarchs similar to what’s happening in the US now, and Putin is widely appreciated and praised within Russia primarily because he either imprisoned those crooks, kicked them out back to Israel or to the US, or keeps them on a short leash, while for the first time in a century focusing on the betterment of his country and its citizens. Of course, in doing this, he angered their global elite friends, which is why the West spews so much venom at Putin and uses their friends in high places (dual citizen billionaire Kolomoyskyi in Ukraine) to overthrow neighboring countries. Most people suck up and repeat this propaganda because they are “true believers” in the liberal project and are intellectual dullards as a result who don’t understand the degree to which they’re being lied to (northway was, not knowing any better, repeating that “Russian aggression” stuff verbatim in the off-topic Canadian election thread the other day. MSM fills people’s heads with so many lies, it’s sad.).

2) Karl Marx as “German leftist forefather” and “Germany’s communist prophet.” Sure, Marx was German, of course. Just like the Bolshevik leadership, Trotsky, Lenin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, and Stalin were ethnic Russian Slavs, right?

3) Postmodernism is another branch of Marxist theology but it’s ridiculous to go on about the “nazi” Heidegger and not mention an individual like Derrida, another dual-citizen, surprise surprise. Postmodernism/deconstruction equates to atomizing and destroying Western traditions and imposing relativism and the modern freak/victim show we see today on society. The point is to destroy identity and ethnic cohesion and break people apart into subgroups that can be used to attack each other. That was the basis of feminism and so many of the other “progressive” projects, but it’s Marxism 101: divide and conquer.

Urgh, I can’t go on, article is rage-inducing and entirely dishonest.

[Plain Meaning]

[trueblue]

Dp

[trueblue]

[chellovek]

As Swartz said, it's "Marxism 101", divide and conquer even though this isn't a specifically Marxist tactic.

"Merger of state power and the social sciences". The derm tyranny of those academics, tekin er jerbs, er gerns, trying to study things and give advice

Man I love visiting this forum

[Enrico Palazzo]

Trueblue, it's verboten to post large texts and without a link, to boot?
Follow the TOS. Thanks.

'Rico