View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lahiho
Joined: 07 Oct 2012
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 9:31 pm Post subject: Contract says one thing in English and another in Korean |
|
|
My contract states in English i will get a return trip flight but the Korean states that I only get it one way. I am nearing the end of my contract and obviously didn't realize until now. Is there anything I can do? Am I entitled to it? Do I just have to shrug my shoulders and let it go? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you actually talked to your employer about it? If so, are they claiming that the Korean contract takes precedence? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lahiho
Joined: 07 Oct 2012
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have, they are the ones who brought it to my attention. They don't want to pay the return flight ticket. I am wondering what the legal discourse in this situation is. For the record, I was originally told it was one way but after seeing the contract I naturally thought nothing of it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Conflicting contracts (both legitimate and signed by you) and NOT an item covered under labor law (labor board won't help) means your only option is to fight it out in civil court and on the chance that you win (not assured) the amount of the award may not cover the expenses of the suit.
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PRagic

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There should be a clause in your English contract stipulating which contract takes precedence. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|