|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Newbie

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 11:11 am Post subject: Koreans and Music |
|
|
Bare (or is it 'bear') with me as i try to make my point here, i've had a cocktail or two ...
I know, that in the past, most threads here about Korea and their music is all about bashing K-pop, which I completely understand. Yet I don't want to bash it here cuz I appreciate it for what it is ... simple, mind-numbedness entertainement. It is nowhere near art or anything like that ... and the fact that Korean singers spend their weekends getting hit on the head by giant foam thumbs, or swinging themselves on whatever else useless intrument of entertainment they may find, is complete testament to this fact. Nonetheless, there are some catchy melodies that can't helped but be laughed at.
Anyway, my problem is this: Do any of you know any Koreans that recognize or appreciate any music that was made before 1990?
It kills me. When I tell Koreans that I like the Peppers, all they can say is "Oh yeah, Californication" Or, I like U2 ... "Yes, With or Without You is very nice"
But when I try to talk to them about the original shiznit, I'll be lucky to get "Oh yeah, I know the Beetles" When I can sing along to a TV commercial playing Buddy Holly or The Monkeys, they look at me like I'm a freak.
They go nuts over crap like Eminem, Linkin Park, Arvil, and the Balck Eyed Peas, but god forbid they should know any Otis, Marvin Gaye, Stones, Cream, The Who, Temptations, Miles Davis ... REAL MUSIC. I've tried on numerous occasions to expose them to this stuff and they have no patience for it.
Please, someone tell me that I'm just keeping the wrong company and that you know Koreans that can appreciate the true geniuss of music like these I have mentioned. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
prosodic

Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Location: ����
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let me guess, you've been talking to a bunch of college students. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lots of college students love Queen, and there seems to be a certain segment of the population who got stuck in the mid eighties hair metal thing. Just last night I was at a party and a girl in her mid twnties asked me if I knew the singer from Skid Row, because she thought he was handsome.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Apple Scruff
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2004 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When it comes to music, Koreans don't know nothin' about nothin'. Their love affair with hip-hop music (and everything that comes with it, like corn-rows, basketball jerseys, and arm-bobbing "Yo yo yo"s and "Yea yea yea"s) is wrecking the universe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
little mixed girl
Joined: 11 Jun 2003 Location: shin hyesung's bed~
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
there's good korean music, bad korean music and all the stuff inbetween.
i really am annoyed by the way so many posters here like to call korean music "crap" or "simple", as if everything coming out of england is pure gold.
this goes for any country in the world, there's gonna be music u like and music that u hate.
but i don't see any reason to go on and on about it.
as i've said before i think bands like the white stripes SUCK, i think most rock music is GARBAGE, i would rather listen to enka or (*gasp*) country than hear "alternative" or "indie" music, which to me sounds elementary schoolish.
i think that eminem IS better than the beatles, yes that's right, i come from a different generation!! i will quickly take boa, christina agularia(sp), or soulhead over elvis.
face it, it's a difference in taste.
and i have never heard of "creme" or "otis"...and i have no burning desire to go after them...  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
LMG, as much as I'd like to stick your head in my fridge and mount you from behind I have disagree with your musical comments. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Westerners are very snotty and snobby about music, and their judgements of what is good and what isn't, and further judgements on the personality of who listens to what..Of course the more alternative, older, and less known a band is, the more kudos it has.
It's like wine for the working class, anyone can be a connoisseur. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Apple Scruff
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
little mixed girl wrote: |
there's good korean music, bad korean music and all the stuff inbetween.
i really am annoyed by the way so many posters here like to call korean music "crap" or "simple", as if everything coming out of england is pure gold.
this goes for any country in the world, there's gonna be music u like and music that u hate.
but i don't see any reason to go on and on about it.
as i've said before i think bands like the white stripes SUCK, i think most rock music is GARBAGE, i would rather listen to enka or (*gasp*) country than hear "alternative" or "indie" music, which to me sounds elementary schoolish.
i think that eminem IS better than the beatles, yes that's right, i come from a different generation!! i will quickly take boa, christina agularia(sp), or soulhead over elvis.
face it, it's a difference in taste.
and i have never heard of "creme" or "otis"...and i have no burning desire to go after them...  |
You've just thrown away any future we could have had together.
'Otis' refers to Otis Redding. You'd do well to check him out. And 'Creme' is actually called 'Cream' - another fine contribution to the world of music by Eric Clapton and friends.
Eminem sucks.
Christina Aguilera sucks.
BoA sucks.
If Elvis were alive today he'd be like 80 years old, but he could still crap down the neck of any 'gangsta' rapper and make them say "Thank you" when he was finished. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
discostar23

Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Location: getting the hell out of dodge
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok first of all You are complaining they don't know anything earlier then the 1990's and you contridicted yourself (with or without you U2 came out in 1987).
I agree the koreans have strange at best tastes in music. I am not about to judge them because as I have come to realize not everyone has the same views on what is good and bad in music.
Also the people you mentioned Marvin Gaye, Otis Redding I think you would be hard pressed to find an individual in their 20's who knows who these people are and knows the impact they have had on music. Same goes for Cream. Really the only reason I know this music is because of watching re-runs of Ed Sullivan and sifting through my fathers record collection.
I am not disagreeing with you that these people and bands are important and the pop music sucks the biscit at the moment but you just have to come to realize that being so educated in music seems to be a western thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Blind Willie
Joined: 05 May 2004
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
little mixed girl wrote: |
i really am annoyed by the way so many posters here like to call korean music "crap" or "simple", as if everything coming out of england is pure gold.
this goes for any country in the world, there's gonna be music u like and music that u hate.
but i don't see any reason to go on and on about it. |
This is probably the smartest thing anyone on this board has ever said about the topic of music
And she's a lot younger than most of you. I bet you feel stupid now.
No, of course you dont. No one is ever wrong here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Blind Willie
Joined: 05 May 2004
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rapier wrote: |
Westerners are very snotty and snobby about music, and their judgements of what is good and what isn't, and further judgements on the personality of who listens to what..Of course the more alternative, older, and less known a band is, the more kudos it has.
It's like wine for the working class, anyone can be a connoisseur. |
This is the second smartest thing about music that has ever been said here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sparkx
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: thekimchipot.com
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
discostar23 wrote: |
Also the people you mentioned Marvin Gaye, Otis Redding I think you would be hard pressed to find an individual in their 20's who knows who these people are and knows the impact they have had on music |
And this is the single most retarded thing said about any subject, ever, in the history of human civilization |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazylemongirl

Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Location: almost there...
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I teach middle school boys so maybe their tastes are slightly skewed. But I had a number of covers of I've heard it throught the grapevine and the kids preferred the marvin gaye version.
What was more shocking was that they preferred the louis armstrong to the ramones version of its a wonderful world.
Which was totally the opposite of what I expected.
Anyway I don't require my kids to like my tastes in music rather that they listen to it and tell me what's wrong about it in english. I'll often say that if we all like the same thing the world would be a very boring place.
I'm happy to say that my music collection reflects that, I can listen to buena vista social club, avril, the stones, decepticonz and a bit of opera in one aftertoon and call it good, but that's my taste.
Anyway we're doing video killed the radio star today as we're doing a lesson on technological changes I'll let you know whether they prefer the version by the buggles or the presidents of the united states. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hojucandy

Joined: 03 Feb 2003 Location: In a better place
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i find the OP's observations to not mesh at all with my own experience. he must be talking only to kids...
i am always intrigued by the tastes in musc here. there is a deep appreciation of jazz, and unusual obsession with progressive rock, lots of interest in early pop and classic rock... and some of my younger friends are crazy about punk.
go into a cd shop in seoul, or busan... there is even a special section for progressive...; and a huge jazz section. if no-one liked this stuff they would not stock it.
the koreans i know listen to the doors, king crimson, miles davis, coltrane, eagles, sam cooke, simon and garfunkel, mozart, bach... as WELL as k-pop. i also have korean friends who enjoy gugak, esp pansori.
in short, i find no difference between the diversity of musical tastes here and in any other country i have visited... and that is quite a few... (except perhaps PNG where people are into pacific pop to the exclusion of anything else!
638 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Apple Scruff
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
discostar23 wrote: |
Ok first of all You are complaining they don't know anything earlier then the 1990's and you contridicted yourself (with or without you U2 came out in 1987).
I agree the koreans have strange at best tastes in music. I am not about to judge them because as I have come to realize not everyone has the same views on what is good and bad in music.
Also the people you mentioned Marvin Gaye, Otis Redding I think you would be hard pressed to find an individual in their 20's who knows who these people are and knows the impact they have had on music. Same goes for Cream. Really the only reason I know this music is because of watching re-runs of Ed Sullivan and sifting through my fathers record collection.
I am not disagreeing with you that these people and bands are important and the pop music sucks the biscit at the moment but you just have to come to realize that being so educated in music seems to be a western thing. |
I am in my early 20's and have been well aware of people like Marvin and Otis since high school. I have never seen a single episode of Ed Sullivan and my parents never had a record collection. People who believe that radio-friendly, mass-marketed pop is the pinnacle of the music world are just plain musically uneducated. If they sought out classics that were mentioned by the OP, they'd steadily realize that the stuff is classic for a reason - it has lasting appeal. Commercial pop is empty and disposable. After 15 or 20 years, it is always looked back on with a giggle and a "What were we thinking?", ala New Kids on the Block, Paula Abdul, and anything Michael Jackson did after 'Thriller'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|