View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Atkinson

Joined: 15 Oct 2004 Location: Land of the Golden Twist-tie
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 6:01 am Post subject: Is Kangnam the best part of Seoul? |
|
|
http://korea.wikicities.com/wiki/Seoul wrote: |
The best part of Seoul is arguably Kangnam. |
Sadly, there's nothing there to back up that claim, yet. I'd like to know what might make it the best part of Seoul, and maybe add it to the wiki. I was there last night and it was interesting to walk around and eat W3,000 kababs while drizzling the oil down my khakis, but I must have missed what makes it the best.
So what is it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyhanlon
Joined: 09 Nov 2003 Location: 서울
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2005 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well.. it's where the money is. however, this does not compensate for the fact that it is totally lacking in class, interesting architecture or culture. sadly i have to live there, to be near my workplace.
personally i love ��û��, in the north of seoul. lots of interesting stuff around there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Atkinson

Joined: 15 Oct 2004 Location: Land of the Golden Twist-tie
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
bobbyhanlon wrote: |
well.. it's where the money is. however, this does not compensate for the fact that it is totally lacking in class, interesting architecture or culture. sadly i have to live there, to be near my workplace.
personally i love ��û��, in the north of seoul. lots of interesting stuff around there. |
Is there anything good about the area from the perspective of someone who doesn't care where the money is? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Atkinson wrote: |
bobbyhanlon wrote: |
well.. it's where the money is. however, this does not compensate for the fact that it is totally lacking in class, interesting architecture or culture. sadly i have to live there, to be near my workplace.
personally i love ��û��, in the north of seoul. lots of interesting stuff around there. |
Is there anything good about the area from the perspective of someone who doesn't care where the money is? |
God no. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Daechidong Waygookin

Joined: 22 Nov 2004 Location: No Longer on Dave's. Ive quit.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 4:20 am Post subject: Re: Is Kangnam the best part of Seoul? |
|
|
Atkinson wrote: |
http://korea.wikicities.com/wiki/Seoul wrote: |
The best part of Seoul is arguably Kangnam. |
Sadly, there's nothing there to back up that claim, yet. I'd like to know what might make it the best part of Seoul, and maybe add it to the wiki. I was there last night and it was interesting to walk around and eat W3,000 kababs while drizzling the oil down my khakis, but I must have missed what makes it the best.
So what is it? |
Yes, Kangnam is the best. It doesnt lack interesting architecture if you are into newer styles. It doesnt have any palaces but it does have an old temple. Ok, so it was moved here, but still. Kangnam is great. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jongno is a lot more eclectic and Itaewon more vibrant. For partying, Hongdae/Ehwa/Sinchon are more down to earth. I will grant that the architecture is a tad more aesthetically pleasing than most areas of Seoul, and there are hot girls there like you wouldn't believe -- but they're probably also a lot less eclectic, vibrant, and down to earth compared to the rest of Seoul's women.
Sparkles*_* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Daechidong Waygookin

Joined: 22 Nov 2004 Location: No Longer on Dave's. Ive quit.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tiberious aka Sparkles wrote: |
Jongno is a lot more eclectic and Itaewon more vibrant. For partying, Hongdae/Ehwa/Sinchon are more down to earth. I will grant that the architecture is a tad more aesthetically pleasing than most areas of Seoul, and there are hot girls there like you wouldn't believe -- but they're probably also a lot less eclectic, vibrant, and down to earth compared to the rest of Seoul's women.
Sparkles*_* |
Itaewon isnt vibrant, its a hellhole. Its sleazy and dirty. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Daechidong Waygookin wrote: |
Tiberious aka Sparkles wrote: |
Jongno is a lot more eclectic and Itaewon more vibrant. For partying, Hongdae/Ehwa/Sinchon are more down to earth. I will grant that the architecture is a tad more aesthetically pleasing than most areas of Seoul, and there are hot girls there like you wouldn't believe -- but they're probably also a lot less eclectic, vibrant, and down to earth compared to the rest of Seoul's women.
Sparkles*_* |
Itaewon isnt vibrant, its a hellhole. Its sleazy and dirty. |
Even vomit can be vibrant.
Sparkles*_* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
uberscheisse
Joined: 02 Dec 2003 Location: japan is better than korea.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Daechidong Waygookin wrote: |
Itaewon isnt vibrant, its a hellhole. Its sleazy and dirty. |
funny, since i moved to seoul, i've yet to see a significant difference between (sh)itaewon and gag-nam as far as levels of civic pride, hygiene and organization. gangnam is a crappy slum with an unwarranted and inflated self-image.
after spending the last 4 weeks or so travelling all over japan and vietnam, i have come to a disturbing conclusion - korea is DIRTY. even gangnam is intolerable.
perhaps i'm slow to come to this but it's the kind of thing i can't wait to bring up in class... "if you fruitcakes love your country so much, why don't you CLEAN IT UP? the JAPANEEEEEEEESE do!!!"
yeah, i'll get fired. so what. seoul is a sh*t-heoul. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
skimilk
Joined: 18 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stayed in the neighborhood for a couple months a few years back, never understood the fascination. Expensive, yes, but other than that, not much to do or see.
Seoul didn't bother me, thought it was clean enough, but that may have to do with the fact that I grew up in NYC... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kangnamdragon

Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Location: Kangnam, Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I live in Kangnam for a reason... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
keithinkorea

Joined: 17 Mar 2004
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kangnam (not KD nothing against you!) is boring, expensive and dull. If you like boring expensive and dull then it's the place for you!
It is also too damn busy, there are huge crowds all the time. It reminds me of Oxford street in London, with worse mannered people, worse shopping, no good watering holes and the half decent ones are ridiculously overpriced. The only reason to go there is the bookshop, but it's little better than other large bookstores that carry English language books.
Itaewon and Hongdea are far better for shopping, food, bars and a generally more interesting and less wallet violating experience.
There are some other areas too with interesting stuff going on, the Insadong street has some cool stuff such as the Nagwon arcade and a few very interesting cultural things. Some of the markets around Namdaemun and the whole Jongru area are interesting.
Seoul needs more litter bins.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zyzyfer

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: who, what, where, when, why, how?
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I gotta second the Jongno nod. Itaewon and Hongdae are alright, but they're imbalanced in what they offer. It's not all about being on the sauce; availability to culture, movies, plays, musical performances, so on. Hongdae is a big dance club with restaurants and Itaewon is an alcoholic pit (which is fine).
The last time I walked around Jongno, though, I realized that it looks like a place where there's a lot to do and has a very distinct "Korea" feeling to it, despite the skyscrapers. Gangnam feels like yuppie-ville to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mashimaro

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: location, location
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
keithinkorea wrote: |
Kangnam (not KD nothing against you!) is boring, expensive and dull. If you like boring expensive and dull then it's the place for you!
|
Amen |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiger Beer

Joined: 07 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am another one who never really 'got' the Kangnam thing.
When I lived in Sillim-dong.. I was about equidistant from Jongno, Itaewon, Hongdae/Shinchon and Kangnam.
During that year.. I went to Jongno 25+ times.. HongDae/Shinchon 50+ times.. Itaewon 50+ times.. and Kangnam I went to 3 times thinking that I was missing something by not going there only to remind myself why I never go there.
Its REALLY boring and VERY overpriced. The few places that are good are pathetic compared to where you can go elsewhere. The Woodstock and XXX Club the two only ones I think are half remotely worthy of going - and they really aren't worth it unless you live in Kangnam or with someone who absolutely insists you go there.
For shopping or walking around.. its just overpriced.. why would I want to go to Kangnam to play expensive billiards or drink an overpriced juice when I can do that anywhere in Korea? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|