|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Keepongoing
Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:18 pm Post subject: IBook Lust |
|
|
A co-worker of mine has a Ibook and I loved it. I asked him what virus program he used, he had one that came with the computer but said that you didn't really need one with an Apple product. I am told Apple is better for graphic programs and multi-media. Also, Apple is coming out with a new OS called Tiger. I think it may be a stabler program than Windows. Another point is that the Ibook is built for portability. I had problems with my Toshiba when carrying it to class everyday.
I am not advertising Apple, just giving my thoughts on this. Also I read that there is a USA connection you can buy that will transfer everything from your PC to your new Ibook.
OK, does anybody have experience with both the Ibook and PC's? How is Apple's OS? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SuperHero

Joined: 10 Dec 2003 Location: Superhero Hideout
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 3:04 pm Post subject: Re: IBook Lust |
|
|
| MASH4077 wrote: |
| A co-worker of mine has a Ibook and I loved it. I asked him what virus program he used, he had one that came with the computer but said that you didn't really need one with an Apple product. |
That's only because most people are currently using windows. Soon enough as apple gains in popularity virus makers will start making viruses for apple products. No operating system is 100% secure.
As for the rest of your question, I have no idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Any Mac OS will be more stable than Windows for various reasons, not many of which are Windows fault.
Enter tha world of Mac....stability, a good, robust, all-in-one type OS and great for what it does. On the negative, a narrow product range, upgrading is not an option for many parts, generally expensive and support is sometimes hard to find.
Apple is better for graphics and multi-media in the professional sense only. You going to produce Toy Story 3?
Personally, I can see no benefit of using a Mac at all. Windows never crashes on me, I've never had a virus, love all the software avaliable and can upgrade anything, anytime. This isn't a Windows feature, but let's say it's a non-Mac feature.
On the virus front, sure, you may be 'safer' with a Mac. Using your head with Windows goes a long way as well. I'm not virus-free solely due to my AV program. In the last 3 years, it saved me only twice. Both times (and now as well) I have nothing to lose from a virus. Backup, backup, backup. I think the virus point is moot for people who invest some time in prevention rather than cure. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 4:19 pm Post subject: Re: IBook Lust |
|
|
| SuperHero wrote: |
| MASH4077 wrote: |
| A co-worker of mine has a Ibook and I loved it. I asked him what virus program he used, he had one that came with the computer but said that you didn't really need one with an Apple product. |
That's only because most people are currently using windows. Soon enough as apple gains in popularity virus makers will start making viruses for apple products. No operating system is 100% secure.
As for the rest of your question, I have no idea. |
Yeah, that's just typical ignorant Mac user talk, people who believe the Cult of the Mac hype. Geez, the guy is begging for a virus to wipe his hard drive. It's like Firebird/Mozilla. I'm a big fan but I don't think it's fool proof. You'll notice you're getting a lot of security updates lately. People are starting to target Firebird too.
You don't hear about Mac virus in the same way you don't hear when Microsoft releases and update for Mac Word. The media generally doesn't care. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Walter Mitty

Joined: 27 Mar 2003 Location: Tokyo! ^.^
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 4:46 am Post subject: Re: IBook Lust |
|
|
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| You don't hear about Mac virus in the same way you don't hear when Microsoft releases and update for Mac Word. The media generally doesn't care. |
Try looking for news stories on Mac Viruses on tech sites like Slashdot. You won't find any. Why not? They're not out there.
I've been running OS X of one version or another for over 3 years and have yet to use any sort of anti-virus or anti-spyware software. They're simply not needed.
Mash, if you want to get a deal on an iBook and have cash to spend right now, go to the Apple Experience Center in Coex this Friday between 6pm and midnight. That's when the launch event for Tiger will be going on. 10% off all new systems. I'll be hitting up the Apple Store in Ginza for a PowerBook, myself.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MASH, you're nearly a power user. Any laptop will not be adequate if you move up that last step. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Keepongoing
Joined: 13 Feb 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 4:53 am Post subject: yes, but |
|
|
| the_beaver wrote: |
| MASH, you're nearly a power user. Any laptop will not be adequate if you move up that last step. |
yes,but the mini-cooper is so cute, Mr.Bean ought to appreciate that.
Well, why can't one have a good laptop and a notebook?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:01 am Post subject: Re: yes, but |
|
|
| MASH4077 wrote: |
| Well, why can't one have a good laptop and a notebook?? |
An ibook only runs about 1.2 Ghz, and as far as I know only supports the built-in monitor. Upgrading and adding parts on a laptop is prohibitively expensive. I think it also only has a 30 gig drive (that deserves a snort of derision).
My view -- laptops suck ass in all areas but portability so don't blow the bank on one. If you need a portable unit spend less than million on a laptop, and use the money you didn't spend on a top line laptop to get a kick-ass desktop (two computers for the price of one).
You could probably get an ibook for around a million but it's a machine that can't do real heavy lifting so you'd need a real computer to do the stuff you're on the cusp of doing and the laptop just to show off the stuff you've done and for a few little jobs like word processing and email. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cheem
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:06 am Post subject: Re: yes, but |
|
|
Hi, I made the "switch" last year and haven't looked back since. I did a minor in Comp.Sci. way back when, so I'm no stranger to hardware, software, and such. Having said that, the IBook is a brilliant little machine. I got myself the 12" model with the 60 GB drive and built-in blue-tooth module.
The hardware is impeccable. Apple engineers are renown for their design prowess and it shows with their laptops. Light, sturdy, nice screen, and just plain sexy. You'll appreciate it when K-girls solicit you for sex when you bust this puppy out at the StarBucks. Seriously speaking, Macs aren't that common here so if you're a poser, you'll appreciate the compliments and stares.
But it's Mac OS X, in my opinion, that really makes the "switch" worthwhile. OS X is just a pleasure to use. Your friend was correct in that you don't really need to worry about viruses or spyware. The interface is simple, intuitive, and just works. The OS is based upon FreeBSD so it's very stable and secure.
In spite of what the naysayers say about the lack of software selection, this hasn't been an issue for me. The IBook comes with 90% of the applications 90% of users will need such as browsers, mail client, and editors. The ILife suite (ITunes, IPhoto, IMovie etc) will cover most other needs. Having said that if you're a power-gamer, I wouldn't recommend a Mac. Mac/OS X just isn't a gaming platform.
So my final parting advice is:
- get an IBook
- get a 12" IBook. it has the same screen resolution as the 14" version, but it's smaller and lighter
- get more RAM. the IBook comes with 256 MB; that's not enough. you want to throw in another 512 MB to 1 GB
- wait until the IBook revision comes out before you buy. there should be a new revision released soon to match the requirements of OS X Tiger. i can't stress this last point enough... WAIT for the next revision.
| the_beaver wrote: |
| An ibook only runs about 1.2 Ghz, and as far as I know only supports the built-in monitor. Upgrading and adding parts on a laptop is prohibitively expensive. I think it also only has a 30 gig drive (that deserves a snort of derision). |
Without getting into the technical mumbo-jumbo, an Apple 1.2 GHz G4 is equivalent to Intel P4 2 GHz or higher. I've run PhotoShop rather heavily on both my IBook and my P4 2.8 GHz desktop back home, and my IBook actually feels snappier. The IBook supports an external monitor mirroring, and with a small hack can support dual displays. It can also support a 60 and 80 GB drive.
| the_beaver wrote: |
| My view -- laptops suck ass in all areas but portability so don't blow the bank on one. If you need a portable unit spend less than million on a laptop, and use the money you didn't spend on a top line laptop to get a kick-ass desktop (two computers for the price of one). |
This might have been true maybe 10 years ago, but hardware miniaturization has come a long way since then and laptops are catching up. I think that phenomenon is where the expression "desktop replacement" comes from. I agree, if you don't plan on ever moving your computer, getting a laptop is stupid. But how many foreigners in Korea do you know who won't want to move their computer at least once? I take my IBook with me everywhere; to the StarBucks, on the train, and when I come back home I plug it into my monitor and use it like I would a desktop. Nice! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redbird
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's some excellent advice in this thread. The computer support I do for a living is heavily PC, with a few Macs thrown in for variety. I have both on my desk at work and both at home, joined by a router. I don't really think my biases tilt heavily one way or the other. Each OS is better at certain things.
But, I'll tell you that if Apple keeps trying to squelch free speech, I'll stop buying their products. This latest action is way over the line:
http://news.com.com/Apple+strikes+back+at+iCon+Jobs+publisher/2100-1047_3-5686487.html
I agree with just about everything Cheem said-- especially the part about Macs having 90% of the programs 90% of us are going to use. I especially think Macs are the right choice for people who are mostly going to surf, chat, and send e-mail, and who don't want to have to think about viruses and firewalls. But if you're like Demophobe-- someone who games and doesn't mind doing a little upkeep-- then PCs are the right choice.
But I agree with the Beav about laptops. With desktops, you get far more for the money and, more importantly, desktops are easier to upgrade and they're useful much longer. In my work, customers start getting sick of their laptops after two years, but when their desktops are 3 years old they seem to be surprised that it's time for an upgrade. The only reason to spend a lot of money on a laptop, in my opinion, is to impress chicks in coffee shops. Hey, maybe that's enough of a reason... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the_beaver

Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 2:22 pm Post subject: Re: yes, but |
|
|
| cheem wrote: |
| This might have been true maybe 10 years ago, but hardware miniaturization has come a long way since then and laptops are catching up. I think that phenomenon is where the expression "desktop replacement" comes from. I agree, if you don't plan on ever moving your computer, getting a laptop is stupid. But how many foreigners in Korea do you know who won't want to move their computer at least once? I take my IBook with me everywhere; to the StarBucks, on the train, and when I come back home I plug it into my monitor and use it like I would a desktop. Nice! |
Here's where I'm coming from.
I have two monitors, three hard drives and a video capture card. If I'm running Photoshop I'm probably also running Word, Publisher, Firefox, WinMedia and another window or two. When I want a bigger drive or more memory I can just pop the case open and put the new stuff in. I've yet to see a laptop that can do these things easily.
For normal users a laptop sized machine is probably okay, but I know MASH and I know he's probably going to be doing the same things soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I totally agree with the_beaver, but with the advent of USB devices, this is no longer a limitation of laptops.
For me, there are a couple of reasons why I don't dig on laptops.
First, comfort. The smaller keyboard that IMHO, lacks the ergonomics of a desktop keyboard, makes my wrists sore after a period, and just feels crowded.
Next, the LCD. I just don't like them. The contrst is too high, the colors surreal, and the sizes on a laptop, even a "large screen", just don't cut it.
Laptops are also always at least one generation behind desktops in a couple of key areas, and due to heat and power concerns, are always scaled back. Laptops systems can't be pushed to the wall (overclocked) to squeeze out the extra frames, or cut that 2 seconds off a photoshop RAW crunch.
Finally, if one needs an add-on keyboard, external drives for storage and a bigger monitor to save one's eyes after hours of work or play, suddenly your portability is gone, the convenience factor nullified and the sexiness of taking up an entire table at Starbucks, with wires strung all over and needing 2 power plug-ins, has become a gruesome mess.
As far as Macs "just working"...well, I admit I am strange. I like computer problems. I back up all the time, and save an outright hardware failure, I like getting in there and solving. I have to say that in many ways, my early computer years were more satisfying, in an odd sense, than my current state.
There is something very cool about computers that unfortunately, one can't really experience until one starts problem-solving. It gave me a deeper understanding of things, and thus, a deeper appreciation for them. It's great when they just hum along perfectly, but as with many things, getting it to that state constantly, was half the fun. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cheem
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 8:00 pm Post subject: Re: yes, but |
|
|
I'm not one of those Apple-Can-Do-No-Wrong fanboys, just playing devil's advocate here:
| the_beaver wrote: |
Here's where I'm coming from.
I have two monitors, three hard drives and a video capture card. If I'm running Photoshop I'm probably also running Word, Publisher, Firefox, WinMedia and another window or two. When I want a bigger drive or more memory I can just pop the case open and put the new stuff in. I've yet to see a laptop that can do these things easily.
For normal users a laptop sized machine is probably okay, but I know MASH and I know he's probably going to be doing the same things soon. |
When I'm in "dev" mode I routinely have 10+ apps open at the same time (2 or 3 instances of Safari, Mail, messenger, Dreamweaver, PhotoShop, FTP client, 2 or 3 instances of the Terminal, text files, PDFs etc) -- and that's with less than a GB of RAM in my IBook. The IBook should be expandable to 1.28 GB and the PowerBook to 2 GB.
Internal expandability will always be an issue with laptops (for obvious reasons) but as Demophobe pointed out, with the emergence of firewire and USB, general expandibility is not really an issue.
| Demophobe wrote: |
| First, comfort. The smaller keyboard that IMHO, lacks the ergonomics of a desktop keyboard, makes my wrists sore after a period, and just feels crowded. |
That's strange because most laptops, even ultraportables like the 12" IBook, are equipped with full-size keyboards. I personally prefer the feel of most laptop keyboards (which tend to have flatter, fatter keys).
| Demophobe wrote: |
| Finally, if one needs an add-on keyboard, external drives for storage and a bigger monitor to save one's eyes after hours of work or play, suddenly your portability is gone, the convenience factor nullified and the sexiness of taking up an entire table at Starbucks, with wires strung all over and needing 2 power plug-ins, has become a gruesome mess. |
That's a bit dramatic, isn't it? 1 cord for the monitor, another for the external drive, and another for the keyboard. 3 cords to unplug before you pack your laptop; and if that's too much work for you, you can spring for a bluetooth keyboard, for a total of 2 cords.
| Demophobe wrote: |
| There is something very cool about computers that unfortunately, one can't really experience until one starts problem-solving. It gave me a deeper understanding of things, and thus, a deeper appreciation for them. It's great when they just hum along perfectly, but as with many things, getting it to that state constantly, was half the fun. |
I can totally understand the techie mentality. Nothing beats building and tweaking your own whitebox, at a fraction of what most vendors charge. Having said that, most power-users (in a video-editing sense) should know their requirements. For guys like the OP who seem enthralled with the aesthetic of the Apple hardware and the workings of the OS, I'd say go for it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cheem
Joined: 18 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 8:08 pm Post subject: Re: IBook Lust |
|
|
| Walter Mitty wrote: |
| mindmetoo wrote: |
I've been running OS X of one version or another for over 3 years and have yet to use any sort of anti-virus or anti-spyware software. They're simply not needed.
|
Good god are you a moron?
...
Security through obscurity is the worst possible form of security. This seems to be the Mac mentality. Macs are obscure therefore no one targets them.
More Mac users sing the praises of their invulnerable Macs, the bigger the target becomes to a hacker looking to earn his black hat and his fame. |
I agree a lot of Mac users are dikheads, but I don't think anyone in this thread has suggested that Macs are invulnerable to viruses. It's been said that anti-virus and spyware software aren't necessary, and for the most part, that's accurate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|