|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
What did you think about it the first time you saw it? |
Hated it! |
|
4% |
[ 4 ] |
Loved it! |
|
51% |
[ 42 ] |
I have mixed feeling about it. |
|
26% |
[ 22 ] |
I haven't seen it yet. |
|
17% |
[ 14 ] |
|
Total Votes : 82 |
|
Author |
Message |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought some parts were funny (like R2-D2 on Grievous's ship).
And yeah, it seemed rushed. Eps 1 and 2 were too talkative, and could be boiled down to about 45 minutes a piece, with the stuff from the Clone Wars to Episode 4 comprising Eps 2 and 3 (if that makes sense).
But, I should at least give Lucas credit for doing it his way, and according to his vision (as flawed and revisionist as it is.)
Off-topic a little, but does anyone know if the Star Wars books (like, the ones that deal with plots before Ep 1 and after Ep 6) are "official?" I mean, do they correspond to the "real" Star Wars Universe? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
endofthewor1d

Joined: 01 Apr 2003 Location: the end of the wor1d.
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
i just saw it this afternoon. i liked it, but it had it's faults. grevious's coughing fits bothered me until i saw that he wasn't all machine, and then i thought it was kind of cool. but who decided to model his speech after triumph the insult comic dog?
as was said many times before, anakin's turn to the dark side was a little too quick. i haven't liked his character in any of the prequels. he's just a whiny little b*tch. i guess that's heredetary though.
hmm... maybe i'm not being entirely fair. now that i think about it, he was on the fence for most of the movie, and after he helps take out windu, i guess it's feasable that he could know then and there that there's no going back.
something i actually liked quite a bit was anakin's transformation to vader. i was wondering the whole time why he was going to need the respirator. the near death by fire was pretty cool. but not only the physical transformation. i think there was a convincing psychological transformation as well once the costume had been donned. in my opinion he comes just enough to a proper point between being merely palpateen's b*tch to being what he'd be 20 years later. even in episode 4, while he's a bad@ss on his own merit, leia makes the comment "i should have expected you to be holding vader's leash" or something like that.
i didn't like the droids acting goofy, or expressing human-like emotions. i didn't like the big beast that obi wan was riding around. i didn't like that jar jar binks or any of his race was still alive. but i did like that he shut the hell up. i believe there is a causal relationship between how much screentime jar jar binks gets and how much a movie sucks.
i've got more to say, but 'master and commander' just came on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I liked Grievous a lot. Cooler than Darth Maul, that's for sure.
I liked Anakin beheading Dooku (although it's always a shame when Christopher Lee gets such short screentime).
I didn't like Mace Windu. What a jerk!
I didn't like the juxtaposing of the Anakin/Obi-Wan duel and the Yoda/Palpatine one. Yoda/Palpatine should have come earlier in the film, and Anakin/Obi-Wan needed its own scene -- no cut-aways.
Another thing that bothered me was that, over the three prequels, there's no consistency with Yoda. In Ep. I I believe he's a puppet, mostly (I could be wrong; I haven't seen Ep. 1 since 1999), and the CGI Yodas in II and III are very different. The scene where Yoda talks one-to-one with Anakin early in the movie, Yoda's head is the size of a beach ball! Even Frank Oz's voice is different.
I liked the scene where Anakin visits Palpantine at the theater. That droning hum sounded very ominous and creepy. And it was nice to learn Palpatine's backstory.
I loved the opening sequence. Watching that on the big screen gave me some serious vertigo.
One question I have is: in Eps I and II, isn't Darth Sidious's (Palpatine's) face all saggy and gruesome when he's disguised in his cloak? If so, why did they need Windu's deflecting his force lightening to explain how his face got that way? It doesn't make sense. Unless I'm remembering wrong and Sidious's face in the first two prequels was similar to Palpatine's -- which doesn't seem right.
Also, who was Darth Tyranos, mentioned in Ep. II? Dooku, right?
Sparkles*_* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazylemongirl

Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Location: almost there...
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tiberious aka Sparkles wrote: |
I liked the scene where Anakin visits Palpantine at the theater. That droning hum sounded very ominous and creepy. And it was nice to learn Palpatine's backstory. |
yes very cool. I think it's to show that dictators need some art in their lives (perhaps a nod to KJI?)
Quote: |
One question I have is: in Eps I and II, isn't Darth Sidious's (Palpatine's) face all saggy and gruesome when he's disguised in his cloak? If so, why did they need Windu's deflecting his force lightening to explain how his face got that way? It doesn't make sense. Unless I'm remembering wrong and Sidious's face in the first two prequels was similar to Palpatine's -- which doesn't seem right. |
I think that sidious always had that face but used the force to give him an apperance of normality.
Quote: |
Also, who was Darth Tyranos, mentioned in Ep. II? Dooku, right? |
yup, you'd be right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
prosodic

Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Location: ����
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tiberious aka Sparkles wrote: |
Zyzyfer wrote: |
Got him to 22 with calendar. |
29 with grasshopper.
Sparkles*_* |
29 with iron skillet |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Canucksaram
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
RE: Darth Tyranus
Yes, Count Dooku is Darth Tyranus.
Yoda trained Dooku. Dooku trained Qui-Gon. Qui-Gon trained Obi-Won. Obi-Won trained Anakin.
Did you catch the line in the movie where Palpatine/Sidious strongly implies that HE is Anakin's father?
In Episode I we learn that Anakin's mother became "spontaneously" pregnant. In Episode III Palpatine/Sidious tells Anakin a story about "Darth Plageuis" and how Plagueis developed such incredible skill with the Force that he could (a) halt the aging process, and (b) cause midi-chlorians to spontaneously begin life.
Overall, the movie sucked. Anakin was not "turned" believably, and being an oh-so-happy expectant father, his murdering the entire creche of Jedi "Younglings" was NOT believable in the least. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dysupes

Joined: 24 May 2005
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ummm, that line where Palpatine tells Anakin about Darth Plageuis made me think that Palpatine was the apprentice to Plageuis and was the one who killed him after learning all his secrets. Though Palpatine could not grant immortality, as he says towards the end when he uses this line to convince Anakin that together they could solve that puzzle and become immortal, he never says anything about whether or not he could create life by manipulating the midi-chlorians. Still, I think it's jumping the gun a bit to say that Palpatine is implying he is Anakin's father... and the reason I say this is because if this were true then Lucas would have made sure to use this in Palpatine's speeches to Anakin to try to lure him to the dark side. This would have been a useful and believable bargaining chip for Palpatine and it's omission has to count towards the idea that it isn't true. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hollywoodaction
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
matthewwoodford wrote: |
DirtySanchez wrote: |
Not like Anakin killing Jackson's character, and going from "what have I done?", to "I'll do whatever you ask" in a couple seconds. |
Yeah I think that was the weakest part.
Nevertheless, I still loved the movie. For a couple of hours you're in a whole different universe. |
Same here. What's with turning to the darkside so easily? I would have liked to have seen him a bit more tormented by his actions. There must be a reason for George Lucas to have chosen to do it that way...I just don't know what it could be. But I loved it. Made me feel like I was a kid again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stumptown
Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Location: Paju: Wife beating capital of Korea
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the video stores in your area have it, rent the original again. Lucas did a good job of writing the prequels to tie in with the original. Luke's training in the original 3 episodes didn't seem to be that intense. I thought vader was looking at the death star in the end of III with palpatine. Also, I think that palpatine's face had always been disfigured and I agree that he used the force to change it. By the way, when the original came out, did it say Episode IV:A new hope? The remastered version says it, as well as including a scene after they hire Han Solo where it shows him talking to Jabba the Hut while he's prepping the Falcon. Was that in the original as well? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lastat06513
Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Location: Sensus amo Caesar , etiamnunc victus amo uni plebian
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Look at my avitar~~ need I say?
I am a BIG Star Wars fan (saw the movie when it first came out in 1977, though I don't remember watching it much since I was shy of my 1st birthday). But I know that from then until now, the series has impacted my life significantly.
Episode I- It needed alot more to make it a good movie. I talked to my friend about it today and we agreed that adding Jar Jar Binks was not a good idea. I think they did that to get children to watch it, trying to ride the same cool fame from the Ewok phenomenon- unfortunately, it didn't work.
Episode II- That movie did a better job of telling the story that the first movie limped away trying to tell. And I think that part where Yoda fought Lord Dukoo (sp?), that kicked some serious arze
Episode III- Was the best out of all the prequals (Yet I'll rank it second only to Empire Strikes Back). I think Lucas did a fantastic job finishing the series. I think this is a good way to thank our generation for the unwavering support we gave him for the rest of the series.
Episode IV- This was the one that started it all. I loved all the fight scenes and the finale was also cool. Especially how Han Solo saved the day,
Yee-haw!! (this is the first and last time you will ever hear me say that on this forum)
Episode V- I believe this movie was ahead of its time in 1980. The visual FX were so cool and it was almost believable. And they introduced alot of new cool characters (Boba Fett) and the awesome song "Imperial March"
Episode VI- I give it thumbs up for being very believable and highly imaginative. Though, like the Jar Jar Binks glut, the Ewoks failed alittle. Cute but not too battle-effective  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mount real

Joined: 07 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anakin turned so easily because of what he did, and he knew he wasn't going to come back to the Jedi order after that. He is a young man and he is trying---desperately---to cling onto whatever truth is slung at him. Therefore he kills the younglings and the other Jedi relunctantly, and after killing the Separatists, sheds a tear. Anakin did whatever he thought was necessary to save Padme, be it with the Sith or with the Jedi. Darth Vader has become a much more complex character because of this, so embrace it or keep clinging onto this original trilogy from your youth a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.
I loved this movie, and the prequels....the prequels was a time for the emotionally reserved Jedi, and the original trilogy, that of the exuberant youth of Luke, Leia, and especially, the much loved Han. I love both trilogies, and I think the prequels would have sucked if it would have been 3 more movies of Han type machismo----as much as I love Han....now I have 2 distinct trilogies, both amazing in their own right...but Obi-Wan rules forever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Revenge of the Sith, IMO, is right up there with Episode IV and V.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matthewwoodford

Joined: 01 Oct 2003 Location: Location, location, location.
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
What I wanted to see tho' was a Faustian moment, where Anakin is tempted by the power. This to be accompanied by a personality change. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
panthermodern

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Location: Taxronto
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought Grevious was what was left of Darth Maul, the Darth Vader proto-type.
Grevious had yellow eyes and red skin, as did Maul.
Grevious was obviously a Cyborg and not a Droid (android).
Personally, I don`t think Mace is Dead.
And I wonder why they cut the `ghost scene` between Yoda and Qui-Gon
and will they add Qui-Gon to the end of Epsd. VI in Star Wars 3D |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stumptown wrote: |
By the way, when the original came out, did it say Episode IV:A new hope? The remastered version says it, as well as including a scene after they hire Han Solo where it shows him talking to Jabba the Hut while he's prepping the Falcon. Was that in the original as well? |
No, the original title was simply 'Star Wars.' It was replaced with 'Episode IV: A New Hope' for the film's return to theaters in, I think, 1978.
The scene with Han and Jabba was originally filmed using a fat guy (human) as Jabba. It was cut, but Lucas inserted it back in for the "special edition" release in 1997, and replaced the fat guy with a (poor) GGI Jabba. That's why Han walks over Jabba's tail: in the original footage Han goes around the guy, and having him step on Jabba's tail, while infinitely stupid, was their only way to make the scene fit.
Also, Greedo doesn't shoot first!
Sparkles*_* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazylemongirl

Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Location: almost there...
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
panthermodern wrote: |
I thought Grevious was what was left of Darth Maul, the Darth Vader proto-type.
Grevious had yellow eyes and red skin, as did Maul.
Grevious was obviously a Cyborg and not a Droid (android).
Personally, I don`t think Mace is Dead.
And I wonder why they cut the `ghost scene` between Yoda and Qui-Gon
and will they add Qui-Gon to the end of Epsd. VI in Star Wars 3D |
I heard they had to cut the scene of qui gon because liam nesson broke his leg. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|