View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Big_Bird
Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
komtengi wrote: |
not guilty and rightly so.... the little punk that started the case is a gold digger... dont you people remember Tyson?? its pretty common in a whoremongering society like the states |
What about Tyson. I presume you are talking about the rape case where he was convicted of raping a beauty pagent?
In fact, the last I heard, she NEVER tried to collect the money that she was awarded. And people who knew her said the whole experience changed her in a very negative way and damaged her for good. Her father regrets ever taking it up with the law.
And why did she get so fucked up? Because nasty people like you were so quick to doubt her story. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JongnoGuru
Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hogwonguy1979 wrote: |
wait until the civil suit hits, he will owe that family so much money he will have to sell Neverland and room with OJ in Miami in order to avoid paying the judgement.
Now he can spend his free time finding the real molester |
Hey, that's sounds familiar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
turtlepi1
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So the parents leave their child with a well advertised guy that has "problems" with children. This guy also just happens to be one of the richest pop stars ever.
In my opinion the parents should have their children removed and they should be charged. They should also be charged with trying to extort money from Jackson.
The real tragedy in this case is what the parents were willing to do to their child in order to get a crack at Jackson's money. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PolyChronic Time Girl
Joined: 15 Dec 2004 Location: Korea Exited
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
turtlepi1 wrote: |
So the parents leave their child with a well advertised guy that has "problems" with children. This guy also just happens to be one of the richest pop stars ever.
In my opinion the parents should have their children removed and they should be charged. They should also be charged with trying to extort money from Jackson.
The real tragedy in this case is what the parents were willing to do to their child in order to get a crack at Jackson's money. |
You are right on. These parents are either a bunch of idiots or gold-diggers who, as sick as this sounds, probably hope their child will get molested in order to get a shot at Wacko Jacko's Jackpot. Jacko has been a freak for years and don't tell me the parents don't know this. I really don't know if Jackson is guilty or not but I am more certain that some of these kids' parents wanted to pimp them out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SHANE02
Joined: 04 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The real tragedy in this case is what the parents were willing to do to their child in order to get a crack at Jackson's money.
Totally agree. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JongnoGuru
Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PolyChronic Time Girl wrote: |
turtlepi1 wrote: |
So the parents leave their child with a well advertised guy that has "problems" with children. This guy also just happens to be one of the richest pop stars ever.
In my opinion the parents should have their children removed and they should be charged. They should also be charged with trying to extort money from Jackson.
The real tragedy in this case is what the parents were willing to do to their child in order to get a crack at Jackson's money. |
You are right on. These parents are either a bunch of idiots or gold-diggers who, as sick as this sounds, probably hope their child will get molested in order to get a shot at Wacko Jacko's Jackpot. Jacko has been a freak for years and don't tell me the parents don't know this. I really don't know if Jackson is guilty or not but I am more certain that some of these kids' parents wanted to pimp them out. |
Maybe those parents saw it as their obligation to teach their children some practical, useful, real-(Western)world skills. Hey, it's never too early to learn. Anyway, what a courtroom culture it's become. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
komtengi
Joined: 30 Sep 2003 Location: Slummin it up in Haebangchon
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big_Bird wrote: |
komtengi wrote: |
not guilty and rightly so.... the little punk that started the case is a gold digger... dont you people remember Tyson?? its pretty common in a whoremongering society like the states |
What about Tyson. I presume you are talking about the rape case where he was convicted of raping a beauty pagent?
In fact, the last I heard, she NEVER tried to collect the money that she was awarded. And people who knew her said the whole experience changed her in a very negative way and damaged her for good. Her father regrets ever taking it up with the law.
And why did she get so *beep* up? Because nasty people like you were so quick to doubt her story. |
how many women go back to a guys hotel room, then go to the bathroom to remove a panty liner from their underwear if sex isnt on their mind? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big_Bird
Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
komtengi wrote: |
Big_Bird wrote: |
komtengi wrote: |
not guilty and rightly so.... the little punk that started the case is a gold digger... dont you people remember Tyson?? its pretty common in a whoremongering society like the states |
What about Tyson. I presume you are talking about the rape case where he was convicted of raping a beauty pagent?
In fact, the last I heard, she NEVER tried to collect the money that she was awarded. And people who knew her said the whole experience changed her in a very negative way and damaged her for good. Her father regrets ever taking it up with the law.
And why did she get so *beep* up? Because nasty people like you were so quick to doubt her story. |
how many women go back to a guys hotel room, then go to the bathroom to remove a panty liner from their underwear if sex isnt on their mind? |
Bloody hell! That's conclusive proof of consent? I'm assuming you must be a man. Let's see, why might she have removed her panty liner. Speaking from experience, a woman often uses them for a day or two at the end of 'that time' just in case. You might, on visiting the loo, decide that it's not useful anymore and that it's crinkling up in an uncomfortable way and smelling rather unfragrant (to put it mildly) and discard it. I did exactly that this afternoon funnily enough... and sex was definately not on my mind! Just grading papers and baby's milk and diapers....
edit: inconclusive should be conclusive
Last edited by Big_Bird on Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:42 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
komtengi
Joined: 30 Sep 2003 Location: Slummin it up in Haebangchon
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big_Bird wrote: |
komtengi wrote: |
Big_Bird wrote: |
komtengi wrote: |
not guilty and rightly so.... the little punk that started the case is a gold digger... dont you people remember Tyson?? its pretty common in a whoremongering society like the states |
What about Tyson. I presume you are talking about the rape case where he was convicted of raping a beauty pagent?
In fact, the last I heard, she NEVER tried to collect the money that she was awarded. And people who knew her said the whole experience changed her in a very negative way and damaged her for good. Her father regrets ever taking it up with the law.
And why did she get so *beep* up? Because nasty people like you were so quick to doubt her story. |
how many women go back to a guys hotel room, then go to the bathroom to remove a panty liner from their underwear if sex isnt on their mind? |
Bloody hell! That's inconclusive proof of consent? I'm assuming you must be a man. Let's see, why might she have removed her panty liner. Speaking from experience, a woman often uses them for a day or two at the end of 'that time' just in case. You might, on visiting the loo, decide that it's not useful anymore and that it's crinkling up in an uncomfortable way and smelling rather unfragrant (to put it mildly) and discard it. I did exactly that this afternoon funnily enough... and sex was definately not on my mind! Just grading papers and baby's milk and diapers.... |
Im well aware of the panty liner phenomenom... thank you for reintroducing it to me. it could also have been that she didnt want that skankness in her panties for mike to find |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
[deleted]
Last edited by Gopher on Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:15 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
[deleted]
Last edited by Gopher on Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
[deleted]
Last edited by Gopher on Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
plokiju
Joined: 15 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pulgasori wrote: |
That Jacko's one smooth criminal. |
I don't really blame the kids parents that much. Jackson is just very skilled at picking his victims. First, he picked a sick kid (he had leukemia or something didn't he?), so that there's something reason he can make a trip to Neverland as some Wish Foundation whatnot, the kid is susceptible. Then he befriends the child and gives the parents a glimpse into some lavish lifestyle. Buys them a few gifts, takes them on trips. He blinds them with jewels while he goes off with the child. Then once he's had his fun or is found out, he can claim the parents (disadvantaged, and the type where money would change them the most) were trying to extort him if they ever accuse him of anything. His plan has reasonable doubt built right in.
Ditto for the other celebrities. They use their celebrity as a defense. I'm thinking mostly of Kobe Bryant since obviously you would need a living accuser.
Did you that one woman said Jackson's acquittal was the best day of her life? Talk about pathetic. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paji eh Wong
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big_Bird wrote: |
What about Tyson. I presume you are talking about the rape case where he was convicted of raping a beauty pagent?
|
A whole pageant? Goddamn. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Literal
Joined: 03 Jul 2003 Location: Third rock from the Sun.
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
turtlepi1 wrote: |
So the parents leave their child with a well advertised guy that has "problems" with children. This guy also just happens to be one of the richest pop stars ever.
In my opinion the parents should have their children removed and they should be charged. They should also be charged with trying to extort money from Jackson. |
I agree. Jackson may or may not innocent, which is entirely diferrent from being found "not guilty," but this mother is one sick woman. She was most definitely after his cash. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|