Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Congressmen say evidence exists to impeach Bush.
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
R. S. Refugee



Joined: 29 Sep 2004
Location: Shangra La, ROK

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 8:53 am    Post subject: Congressmen say evidence exists to impeach Bush. Reply with quote

British bombing raids were
illegal, says Foreign Office

Michael Smith
A SHARP increase in British and American bombing raids on Iraq in the run-up to war ��to put pressure on the regime�� was illegal under international law, according to leaked Foreign Office legal advice.

The advice was first provided to senior ministers in March 2002. Two months later RAF and USAF jets began ��spikes of activity�� designed to goad Saddam Hussein into retaliating and giving the allies a pretext for war.

The Foreign Office advice shows military action to pressurise the regime was ��not consistent with�� UN law, despite American claims that it was.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1660300,00.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Democratic congressmen claimed last week the evidence it contains is grounds for impeaching President George Bush.




That's pretty vague. Any idea who they are?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Article II

Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.



I'm neither a legal scholar nor a constitutional expert, but I'm having difficulty seeing where any of the violations mentioned in the article are covered in Article II, Section 4.

Clarifying opinions are welcome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dulouz



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Uranus

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Accusing him of being a monkey didn't go over well. The DNA test didn't come out right. After that, accusations of WAR CRIMES gets more attention.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emma Goldman



Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Location: state of anarchy

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We'll see if enough congress men and women have the courage to take this all the way. And if the U.S. media has the courage to cover it adequately.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Article II

Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.


I see no mention of BJ there so to have gone for Clinton, the list must have been extended.

Was it for "lying" that he was impeached but acquitted?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emma Goldman



Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Location: state of anarchy

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It must have been either a high crime or a miss-demeanor. Maybe both.

In America, sex can be a heinous crime, but state sanctioned violence is celebrated. This is the most extreme of perversities.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wangja



Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Seoul, Yongsan

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 5:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Emma Goldman wrote:
It must have been either a high crime or a miss-demeanor. Maybe both.

In America, sex can be a heinous crime, but state sanctioned violence is celebrated. This is the most extreme of perversities.


Definitely a Miss Demeanor. She was unmarried I believe? Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Perjury article: William Jefferson Clinton provided "perjurious, false and misleading testimony" before Independent Counsel Ken Starr's grand jury.

Obstruction of justice article: William Jefferson Clinton obstructed justice to "delay, impede, cover up, and conceal the existence of evidence" related to the Jones case.

Quote:


Above are summaries of the two articles of impeachment for Clinton.

IMO the real reason behind Clinton's impeachment was that Henry Hyde was years past his prime when he had an affair and was just jealous that Bill was still getting some.

BTW, welcome Soviet...umm, er Emma.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Emma Goldman



Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Location: state of anarchy

PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Perjury article: William Jefferson Clinton provided "perjurious, false and misleading testimony" before Independent Counsel Ken Starr's grand jury.

Obstruction of justice article: William Jefferson Clinton obstructed justice to "delay, impede, cover up, and conceal the existence of evidence" related to the Jones case.

Quote:


Above are summaries of the two articles of impeachment for Clinton.

IMO the real reason behind Clinton's impeachment was that Henry Hyde was years past his prime when he had an affair and was just jealous that Bill was still getting some.

BTW, welcome Soviet...umm, er Emma.


Thanks for the welcome, but it is a case of