View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:24 pm Post subject: South Korea Gave North Korea US$3.5 Billion |
|
|
S. Korea Gave North US$3.5 Billion Since 1995
A U.S. report reveals that South Korea gave the North a total of US$3.493 billion in assistance, including fertilizer and food aid, between 1995 and 2004. The report by the Congressional Research Service said South Korean aid for the North remained at a yearly average of $25 million from 1996 to 1999, after soaring to $240 million during the North Korean famine of 1995. After the inter-Korean summit of 2000, however, the annual average skyrocketed to $590 million.
Chosun Ilbo (June 21, 2005)
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200506/200506210015.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wrench
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it just me or are Korean's that blind. They are assisting a murderer. I would say to bad you made your own bed now sleep in it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan The Chainsawman

Joined: 05 May 2005
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pay off money? Keep them happy enough to keep the north from doing something really stupid like invading? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
And look at all the benefits and gestures of peace and friendship that the North has rained on the South in return!
Ken:> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alias

Joined: 24 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Where is Soviet_Man with his apologetics? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stated the way this is, it is inflammatory. Remember that there was no nuclear crisis for most of that decade and there was a major famine. Subtract food aid and fertilizer--humanitarian aid, and how much do you have left? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
soviet_man

Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
As a general rule, I oppose the concept of the ROK sending money (or other materials) to the DPRK. They have no obligation to do so and I predict little would change if it stopped.
The DPRK has long had the political and economic tools available to exist and prosper entirely on its own devices - without any external sources.
But in saying that, any pro-DPRK stance adopted by the ROK government (or anyone) is not something to strictly oppose. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The DPRK has long had the political and economic tools available to exist and prosper entirely on its own devices - without any external sources.
|
I guess the obvious question is: why doesn't NK use those tools, instead of taking money from the South? Especially seeing as how their official ideology is self-reliance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
S. Korea Gave Jim Jong Il, his family and cronies, US$3.5 Billion Since 1995
-Just thought I'd correct the title
I'm against giving aid unless it can be assured to reach its deserved target: the poor and oppressed. Too often it simply acts as a band aid to prop up ruthless dictators and their regimes.
Take Zimbabwe for example. Mugabe is now accepting foreign aid after forceing 50% of the country into starvation. What does he do? He expels aid workers as spies, diverts all the resources to his army and loyal supporters, and blockades roads into areas where the majority are of a different ethnicity, or have voted against him in his sham election.
He even brought in new voting rules to enable him to pinpoint exactly which villages had most votes against him, and is currently bulldozing every urban shanty to the ground at gunpoint because they are strongholds of anti-mugabe support.
This is where the North korea association comes in: his vicious presidential guard thugs were trained in torture by North koreans, which he has welcomed into the country.
DON'T send any more aid there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
rapier wrote: |
S. Korea Gave Jim Jong Il, his family and cronies, US$3.5 Billion Since 1995
-Just thought I'd correct the title
I'm against giving aid unless it can be assured to reach its deserved target: the poor and oppressed. Too often it simply acts as a band aid to prop up ruthless dictators and their regimes.
DON'T send any more aid there. |
The report warns North Korea is making it difficult to monitor whether food aid goes to those in need or is diverted to the army or sold in the market. It said monitoring was becoming more difficult because China and South Korea provide almost all of their aid unmonitored.
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200506/200506210015.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Real Reality wrote: |
The report warns North Korea is making it difficult to monitor whether food aid goes to those in need or is diverted to the army or sold in the market. It said monitoring was becoming more difficult because China and South Korea provide almost all of their aid unmonitored.
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200506/200506210015.html |
The only logical conclusion you can reach is that these countries have a vested interest in propping up Kim Jong Il under the guise of humanitarian aid. A well-fed tyrant is less of a danger than a desperate one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pyongshin Sangja

Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Location: I love baby!
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The DPRK has long had the political and economic tools available to exist and prosper entirely on its own devices - without any external sources. |
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. As much as I honestly want to agree with you: wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yesterday

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Land of the Morning DongChim (Kancho)
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 3:14 pm Post subject: Re: South Korea Gave North Korea US$3.5 Billion |
|
|
[quote="Real Reality"] South Korean aid for the North remained at a yearly average of $25 million from 1996 to 1999.
Chosun Ilbo (June 21, 2005)
so those guys who disagree with the south giving to the north should also disagree with this?...........
The United States said on Wednesday it will give North Korea 50,000 tonnes of food aid.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/050622/15/utjn.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
soviet_man

Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I guess the obvious question is: why doesn't NK use those tools, instead of taking money from the South? Especially seeing as how their official ideology is self-reliance. |
That is an excellent point.
And ... for the record, during the last year alone (2004/2005):
* The DPRK economy grew by 2.2%
* The DPRK's GDP increased for the sixth consecutive year
* DPRK grain output increased
* DPRK agriculture, forestry and fishery production grew by 4.1%
* DPRK electricity, gas and water production increased by 4.5%
The trends continue to be up.
Quote: |
Take Zimbabwe for example. Mugabe is now accepting foreign aid .... This is where the North korea association comes in: his vicious presidential guard thugs were trained in torture by North koreans, which he has welcomed into the country. |
In general, I agree with about 80% of Mugabe's policies.
Mugabe was correct (for instance) to use force to redistribute land and prevent capitalistic and anti-state economic situations from arising in Zimbabwe.
Those who oppose Mugabe (pro-White, pro-colonialist groups or hardline black nationalists) also have an equally long and hypocritical history of using force to obtain their political agenda. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pyongshin Sangja

Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Location: I love baby!
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Of course they do. Mugabe is, however, a deadman. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|