View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dulouz wrote: |
Quote: |
Secondly, I disagree that there is anything wrong with choosing which child or which kind of child you adopt. |
People that go child shopping always insist on the same credibility as biologic parents. Biologic parents can't pick and choose but none the less we are via contemporary values forced to give the sme recognition.
Thats not right. |
Biological parents can't pick and choose? Perhaps you have not heard of abortion? I think in the case of biological birth or adoption, people are looking for (hoping for) the same thing-a healthy baby. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dulouz
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Uranus
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The abortion analogy fails. It is not the same. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is my take on this whole thing. Some people won't forgive you if you hurt them badly enough and some people won't forgive you if you help them too much. A proud person is resentful of the fact that they needed and received help and that resentment if often directed at the helper. As Koreans seems to possess an overweening national pride, they often resent those who helped them most. I have seen this in some Koreans' attitudes toward the US (Don't misunderstand, Koreans have every right to complain about many things regarding the US and they have every right to tell them it's time for them to leave. But some go so far as to claim that they never really needed the help of the US and other allies and claim that life here would have been better without their help. Or, as in the case of that bitter adoptee, they may admit that their lives would have been more difficult without the help they received, but they still resent the fact that they received help.) I also saw this during the "IMF crisis" which should have been called, "Cronyism Crisis" or "Chaebol Crisis" or "Massive Corruption Crisis" or "Bad Debt Crisis" or a host of other names but not "IMF Crisis."
Of course, there are many Koreans who are grateful just as there are many Korean adoptees who are grateful. But I think that because Korea has such a strong nationalistic (and ethnic) pride, it seems to produce a lot of people with the sort of pride exhibited here-the kind of pride that denies it ever received outside help or admits it, but resents it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dulouz wrote: |
The abortion analogy fails. It is not the same. |
Analogy? Abortion is simply a fact and it is also a fact that people often "pick and choose" to abort because of what they are told the baby will be like if carried to term. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dulouz
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Uranus
|
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, the analogy fails. Abortion is a serious life long psycological and physical matter. Not picking one baby out of an adoption catalog is nowhere near as serious. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
dulouz wrote: |
Quote: |
Secondly, I disagree that there is anything wrong with choosing which child or which kind of child you adopt. |
People that go child shopping always insist on the same credibility as biologic parents. Biologic parents can't pick and choose but none the less we are via contemporary values forced to give the sme recognition.
Thats not right. |
You know what? Forget the "abortion analogy," as you call it. It doesn't matter nearly as much to me as your assertion that it's "not right," for adoptive parents (called "people who go child shopping," by some) to get the same recognition as biological parents. Perhaps you can explain why and you can begin by answering On The Other Hand's question. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dulouz
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Uranus
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Dulouz:
I myself was adopted, at under one year of age. Are you saying that it is wrong for me to recognize my adoptive parents as my parents in the same way that other people recognize their biological parents?
|
To answer your question, I'll have to say no. In better times I would say yes and I would support you but if I give on this its really going to get abused. If you want to be honest with me, I'll come around plenty but as far as being bullied into accepting a Frankenstien "children of all races to prove we aren't racist" family I'm afraid I have to say no.
I'm going to introduce the word "modesty" into this debate. Generally thats how this arm twisting thing works out. You offer a modest example and immediately after that, even before the ink has dried, I'll get pressured into accepting a Frankenstien family protest sign.
Law parents will never equal bio parents and we should be mature enough to admit that. Ok, I'll give OTOH, what he/she wants. Bio= Law. Transplant day comes around and one patient dies due to heavy handed PC. We can move beyond this for now.
Adoption certainly has a place. In the old days, adoption was used to make over a mishap or mistake. Intra family or close friend adoptions. This is modest and I'll give a due amount of respect and compassion for that. Its a very quiet and private subject.
This thread however elucidates an abuse that quite sickening to me. Wanting a kid is the most selfless/selfish act imaginable and more importantly to easy to manipulate people. Using that potentail, this Christian church went over got a bunch of converts and modern liberals use these kids as exotic furniture and protest signs. This is the version of adoption you really want me to approve.
I don't have to accept it. Angelina Jolie got a souviner of the Killing fields and Africas Aids crisis. She said she had room in heart for a child to love, but then she turned it into a political statement. She just lied using the power of people's good will. Thats very wrong.
There is a Christian tenent about taking reward for doing good works. Good works are supposed to be done anonomously else its just profiteering and vanity. Its a very good rule. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joe_doufu

Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
dulouz wrote: |
Adoption certainly has a place. In the old days, adoption was used to make over a mishap or mistake. Intra family or close friend adoptions. This is modest and I'll give a due amount of respect and compassion for that. Its a very quiet and private subject. |
What are you, some kind of a nutball?
People who can't or don't want to bear children but want to raise/take care of them + children who have no parents and will otherwise likely die before age 8 = good match. Who cares why the parents choose to adopt? Who gives a flip where the children came from? They are better off. Nobody in this world grows up sans "issues" but adoptees are pretty consistently within the ranks of "sane enough to work it out for themselves" when they reach adulthood.
Quote: |
There is a Christian tenent about taking reward for doing good works. Good works are supposed to be done anonomously else its just profiteering and vanity. Its a very good rule. |
Oh, I see, you are indeed some kind of a nutball.
Great, do "good deeds" as defined by the eyes of others, but don't let anybody know about them. Maybe that will buy you a ticket to the afterlife, but it's pretty stupid before then. Either do it because you want to do it (not because somebody tells you it's "good") or do it for others to see. As for me, I'll stick with good old fashioned vanity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Angelina Jolie-
Great philanthropist or keeper of trophy-children?
Both? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
flakfizer

Joined: 12 Nov 2004 Location: scaling the Cliffs of Insanity with a frayed rope.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
dulouz wrote: |
Quote: |
Dulouz:
I myself was adopted, at under one year of age. Are you saying that it is wrong for me to recognize my adoptive parents as my parents in the same way that other people recognize their biological parents?
|
To answer your question, I'll have to say no. In better times I would say yes and I would support you but if I give on this its really going to get abused. If you want to be honest with me, I'll come around plenty but as far as being bullied into accepting a Frankenstien "children of all races to prove we aren't racist" family I'm afraid I have to say no.
I have known several adopters and adoptees, and none of them fits this description.
Law parents will never equal bio parents and we should be mature enough to admit that. Ok, I'll give OTOH, what he/she wants. Bio= Law. Transplant day comes around and one patient dies due to heavy handed PC. We can move beyond this for now.
What are you talking about? Are you "proving" that "law parents" are not equal to "bio parents" because they're not as good at matching kidneys?
Adoption certainly has a place. In the old days, adoption was used to make over a mishap or mistake. Intra family or close friend adoptions. This is modest and I'll give a due amount of respect and compassion for that. Its a very quiet and private subject.
This thread however elucidates an abuse that quite sickening to me. Wanting a kid is the most selfless/selfish act imaginable and more importantly to easy to manipulate people. Using that potentail, this Christian church went over got a bunch of converts and modern liberals use these kids as exotic furniture and protest signs. This is the version of adoption you really want me to approve.
I don't have to accept it. Angelina Jolie got a souviner of the Killing fields and Africas Aids crisis. She said she had room in heart for a child to love, but then she turned it into a political statement. She just lied using the power of people's good will. Thats very wrong.
Here is where we agree and disagree. If "modern liberals" are adopting foreign kids to make a statement about their political views or whatever, then I think most would agree that is sickening. However, I guess I am either less cynical or more naive than you and do not think that that is the norm when it comes to adoption. I'm curious as to how you know the motives of men's hearts. I also wonder, if you saw me walking down the street with my wife and family, if you would consider me a "liberal" who is out to prove that he is not a racist. Would my family qualify as a "Frankenstein family," I wonder? How about a family that adopts special needs kids, are they out to prove that they love the dislabled?
There is a Christian tenent about taking reward for doing good works. Good works are supposed to be done anonomously else its just profiteering and vanity. Its a very good rule. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Quote:
Dulouz:
I myself was adopted, at under one year of age. Are you saying that it is wrong for me to recognize my adoptive parents as my parents in the same way that other people recognize their biological parents?
To answer your question, I'll have to say no. In better times I would say yes and I would support you but if I give on this its really going to get abused. If you want to be honest with me, I'll come around plenty but as far as being bullied into accepting a Frankenstien "children of all races to prove we aren't racist" family I'm afraid I have to say no. |
That's a rather strange second sentence there(the one that begins "in better times"). You seem to be saying that you actually support adotpive parents having the same status as biological parents, but that on this thread you're going to say that you're opposed to it because to admit that you support it would undermine your argument about cross-cultural adoption. So I'm really not sure how to respond here. Do I respond to what you say you would believe "in better times", or to what, by your own admission, you're simply CLAIMING to believe here?
But I do see from where your dilemna arises. If you admit that it is possible for MY adoptive parents to be regarded as my real parents, then you would pretty much have to admit that at least SOME people who adopt cross-culturally should also be considered the real parents of their adoptees. But so far on this thread, you have treated ALL cross-cultural adoptive parents as part of a single category, ie. well-heeled liberals looking for another nifty adornment. Commited as you are to this stereotype, you can't officially admit the variations that you unofficially admit(via your "better times" comment) do in fact exist.
If you think Angelina Jolie adopted a Cambodian orphan for the wrong reasons, by all means criticize her motivations, as well as the motivations of anyone else who behaves as she does. Hell, I like to see pretentious liberal posers roasted over the coals as much as anyone. But I can see no justification for spraying your vitriol against the entire class of people known as "cross-cultural adoptive parents". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Transplant day comes around and one patient dies due to heavy handed PC. We can move beyond this for now.
What are you talking about? Are you "proving" that "law parents" are not equal to "bio parents" because they're not as good at matching kidneys?
|
I found that one strange as well. If there is no taboo against adoption, the adoptee will know he's adopted, and no one will bother trying to transplant the kidney in the first place. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did some volunteer work in a Korean orphanage for a couple of months. My experience is limited to that one orphanage so I won't make any generalizations.
The place was run by a church and the facilities were quite good. Clean, bright, and not very institutional-looking. Each kid had a roommate. I don't know if there was government funding in addition to the church funding. There were about 25 kids and 6 or 7 adults who worked there. The two oldest kids were going to college.
All in all, it was not nearly as bad as I had been led to expect. I've heard the bias stories about kids in school not liking orphans because they must be 'bad' because no parent is there to teach them. It isn't good to marry an orphan because they don't have a 'good' family.
Anyway, this one place was a reasonable place to grow up, from what I could see.
Given that, I still think I would prefer to grow up in a family as an adopted kid. I have a friend who is an orphan and grew up in a Russian orphanage. He says the other kids are his family. Now that he's grown he spends time contributing his skill (dentistry) to the kids and doing fund-raising. He also says that he wishes he knew what it was like to have a 'real' family. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinglejangle

Joined: 19 Feb 2005 Location: Far far far away.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dulouz wrote: |
There is a Christian tenent about taking reward for doing good works. Good works are supposed to be done anonomously else its just profiteering and vanity. Its a very good rule. |
No, I believe that the Biblical tenet is meant to convey the idea is that you should do good deeds quietly and humbly to ensure that your motivation is pure.
Or do you really think my right hand cares what my left hand is doing?
There is another bilical tenet that I like.
Judge not lest ye be judged.
That's a pretty good one too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinglejangle

Joined: 19 Feb 2005 Location: Far far far away.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-Ta, that's good to hear. Maybe the one I went to was a bad case.
Hope so. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|