| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Real Reality
Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:02 am Post subject: People Leaving Korea. Hub of Asia? |
|
|
People Leaving Korea Outnumber Arrivals
Including foreigners, the number of people who left the country for a long-term stay stood at 483,000. They outnumbered Koreans and foreigners who came to stay -- 444,000 -- reducing the population by 39,000. Most went to the U.S., which drew 26.6 percent or 89,000, followed by China (19.6 percent), Japan (12.0 percent), Canada (8.7 percent), and Australia (5.5 percent).
Chosun Ilbo (September 22, 2005)
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200509/200509220019.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weatherman

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| THe key here is long terms stays. People aren't immigrating these days in the numbers that they used too. That is a good thing, but with a more interconnected world, people do make long term stays. I would say that 98% of us ESLers are in this number. But it is also an economic thing too, those heading out long term from Korea to overseas, have some means back in the homeland. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neil
Joined: 02 Jan 2004 Location: Tokyo
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Wouldn't net immigration be good for foreigners as it would mean they would rely on incoming labour more? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cymro
Joined: 11 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
These figures don't add up! (Do they ever?!)
483,000 left. 26.6% (89,000) were "drawn" to the US?
26% is over a quarter, so should be about 121,000, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:19 pm Post subject: Re: People Leaving Korea. Hub of Asia? |
|
|
| We get it. Korea wants to be the hub of Asia but it has a long way to go. Right. Keep beating that dead horse, RR. Because preaching to a bunch of converted low status foreigners is going to affect change... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
who's sock is RR? i'm guessing rapier. he seems bitter enough.
swiss james really riled him up with that hub of asia stuff. haha. poor RR had worked so hard to mock that sentiment and then somebody comes and says "hey, it's not entirely untrue." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Swiss James

Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How anyone can read a report about Koreans going abroad to sightsee or study and then say
"See! I told you Korea isn't a regional hub!!"
is totally beyond me.
If he wanted to beat that particular dead horse I think this article would have done a much better job
Korea Rated Least Likely Asian Financial Hub
But then that would involve understanding the concept of a "hub" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lastat06513
Joined: 18 Mar 2003 Location: Sensus amo Caesar , etiamnunc victus amo uni plebian
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hub= the center of something.
Hubcap= the center of a wheel on a vehicle.
Korea= Hubcap
The more Korea strives to be the "hub" of something, the more it fails. They are trying to improve infrastructure and facilities while introducing better technology. Thats good and all....but...
The one thing Korea lacks is the people skills to welcome foreigners into the country. The society here is too afraid that they would lose their identity if too many foreigners come and open up shop here.
That's why places like Singapore, Hong Kong and Shanghai all did better, they were willing to open their doors to the international community to make them more competitive, while Korea is afraid of competitiveness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Swiss James

Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah but geographically Korea is superior in a lot of ways, the air connections are better, you can easily get stuff shipped in by sea from both Japan and China, the government provides a lot of tax breaks to encourage trade etc.
Speaking from the perspective of someone who actually came to Korea as a businessman- I found Koreans incredibly welcoming. All of my co-workers who come here are blown away by the hospitality (the problems come later..)
The level of english spoken here is definitely higher than in Shanghai- haven't done business there yet, but I'm told by colleagues it's all about secret meetings in the backrooms of tea houses- our english company got precisely nowhere in China until we employed someone who was an expert in the wheeling and dealing that goes on there (the Korean contract was much more straightforward).
Singapore and Hong Kong? No clue- maybe you've tried to set up businesses there? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lastat06513 wrote: |
Hub= the center of something.
Hubcap= the center of a wheel on a vehicle.
Korea= Hubcap
|
Hey, you're stealing Jongnoguru's material! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nrvs

Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Location: standing upright on a curve
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The idea of Korea surpassing Singapore or Hong Kong as an Asian center for international business is absolutely laughable.
| Swiss James wrote: |
| the air connections are better, |
Singapore and Hong Kong are far more important as air hubs. Both are in the top 10 (measured by international passenger traffic). Incheon isn't even on the list. Measured by all passenger traffic, Hong Kong and Singapore are in the top 30 -- and Singapore doesn't have any domestic flights! Again, where's Incheon? Not there. They weren't on the list in 2003 or 2002 either. Even Philadelphia was 30th in 2004, and trust me, Philadelphia is only a hub of cheesesteaks.
Even if you ignore the statistics, just about everyone I've ever talked to has agreed that Changi Airport is the best airport they've ever been to. It's the main stopover for flights from Australia, New Zealand, India, other points in Southeast Asia, and Europe, so lots of folks know it well. Hong Kong is pretty much on the same level, only a bit further north.
| Swiss James wrote: |
| you can easily get stuff shipped in by sea from both Japan and China, |
Hong Kong is the world's busiest container port, and Singapore is number two. Busan is fifth, which isn't too shabby, but Hong Kong and Singapore have the capacity for TWICE as many containers per year as Busan. They've both overshot Busan by 10 million containers. Singapore's pretty close to China -- and Hong Kong is China. Both are only a few days away from Japan. Besides, with the low cost of container shipping these days it doesn't really matter where products are shipped from anyway. Only the efficiency and capacity of the ports matter -- and | |