View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Har ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The evil penguin

Joined: 24 May 2003 Location: Doing something naughty near you.....
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sure every culture uses sarcasm to some degree but it does seem that the ability of koreans to detect it in ther english language is very diminished. Even those whose english ability is quite good. Anybody else faced with the regular task of writing lengthy student evaluations?. Even for the baby classes...
Use for example one student named "Joe". 11 years old. Thick as the "Kim" section in the korean white pages and blessed with the charisma of sea-sick tree sloth. Any questions as complex as "How are you Joe?" get answered with a baleful expression and a moo-like "Huh?".
Not being allowed to say anything negative about our students, and being in a particularly sarcastic mood, my evaluation sheet was handed in with somehting on the lines of "Joes ability to discuss in depth the general slide of Shakespere's Hamlet into depravity, whilst also articulately debating the role of english in modern day korean society, has, in conjucntion with his improving hand (finger) to nose co-ordination skills, enabled him to rise to the ranking position of the 10th best student in a class of 8."
The korean co-teacher dutifully checked over my comments and enquired about the shakespere part.
When told that i often discuss with the students the works of old Bill in between instructing them to to remove their pencils from their noses and informing 'em that the word chicken is not spelt with a "w", the korean teacher blankly nodded and marked off the evaluation sheet as being ready to hand to the parents... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Veronica

Joined: 29 Aug 2005
|
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The evil penguin wrote: |
Not being allowed to say anything negative about our students, and being in a particularly sarcastic mood, my evaluation sheet was handed in with somehting on the lines of "Joes ability to discuss in depth the general slide of Shakespere's Hamlet into depravity, whilst also articulately debating the role of english in modern day korean society, has, in conjucntion with his improving hand (finger) to nose co-ordination skills, enabled him to rise to the ranking position of the 10th best student in a class of 8."
... |
That is priceless. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tomato

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: I get so little foreign language experience, I must be in Koreatown, Los Angeles.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my last message, I listed situations which we would call "sarcasm."
I just thought of another situation and added it to the list.
Interested parties, see my message on page 2. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bo Peabody wrote: |
Americans aren't really that great at sarcasm as they claim to be. The Canucks do it better, the Brits do it best.
|
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. If you want to claim the title then go right ahead. And it's irony, not sarcasm, that the Brits are best at. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bo Peabody
Joined: 25 Aug 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Leslie Cheswyck wrote: |
Bo Peabody wrote: |
Americans aren't really that great at sarcasm as they claim to be. The Canucks do it better, the Brits do it best.
|
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. If you want to claim the title then go right ahead. And it's irony, not sarcasm, that the Brits are best at. |
Nope Leslie. Not trying to claim the title. An apparent slipshod attempt at self-deprecation and an even shoddier attempt at praising the Brits. I knew they were good at one of those two things so I took a 50-50 shot and still got it wrong.
I'm American, but you probably know that already.
What's your weapon of choice: sarcasm or irony?
Now if I only knew how to distinguish the two...
Last edited by Bo Peabody on Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:37 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cionanian-cro
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IS sarcasm truly universal? DOES it exist in all cultures and languages?
People here seem to be saying it does, or should. It seems like an unfounded assumption to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bo Peabody
Joined: 25 Aug 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cionanian-cro wrote: |
IS sarcasm truly universal? DOES it exist in all cultures and languages?
People here seem to be saying it does, or should. It seems like an unfounded assumption to me. |
Again, you can't just make these broad statements and leave. Elaborate. Or was that an attempt at sarcasm? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bo Peabody wrote: |
Nope Leslie. Not trying to claim the title. An apparent slipshod attempt at self-deprecation and an even shoddier attempt at praising the Brits. I knew they were good at one of those two things so I took a 50-50 shot and still got it wrong.
I'm American, but you probably know that already.
What's your weapon of choice: sarcasm or irony?
Now if I only knew how to distinguish the two... |
I apologise for the error.
Though I can't determine whether Canadians are better at sarcasm than Americans or vice verse I can concede to the Brits their mastery of the ironic arts.
Still, I think we yanks do pretty well at irony ourselves. One viewing of Casablanca will reveal that.
Naturally, I wish to maintain that irony is my 'weapon of choice', but in reality I figure I most often resort to sarcasm.
Edit: Sarcasm is like entry level ironic humor...Irony 101, Sarcasm.
As we become adults, we're supposed to move up to the advanced level. Even though many of us do, we still enjoy the basics.
"Way to go, Einstein!"
"Oh, You must have to fight the ladies off with a stick."
"And they said it wouldn't last." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cionanian-cro
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bo Peabody wrote: |
cionanian-cro wrote: |
IS sarcasm truly universal? DOES it exist in all cultures and languages?
People here seem to be saying it does, or should. It seems like an unfounded assumption to me. |
Again, you can't just make these broad statements and leave. Elaborate. Or was that an attempt at sarcasm? |
Not sarcasm. Nor is it a statement. Just a question I'm throwing out there. Is sarcasm inherent in human nature? I don't know how to elaborate much beyond that.
Do the Bushmen of the Kalahari appreciate sarcasm? Do the Eskimos? Did the Vikings? The earliest homo sapiens? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
red dog

Joined: 31 Oct 2004
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry to get off topic here, but did any of you know that both "Eskimo" and "Bushmen" appear on a database of racial slurs? I won't post a link to the site because the content is highly offensive, but I found it through a Google search. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baldrick

Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: Location, Location
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I LOVE sarcasm. Honestly, its great. Lets see this again :
There is nothing more uncomfortable than a winning sarcastic quip falling by the wayside. At home in the pub, the way you cheaply slagged off your mate would have bought the house down, in Korea it would be met with a ball grinding silence and glares. Instead of feeling like a guy who is amusing and receiving backslaps from fellow ****takers, some people choose to avoid you altogether. I love the article and diagram which explains that its the faliure to understand the social situation which precludes this. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cionanian-cro
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I knew (but forgot) that "Eskimo" was inaccurate, and that they prefer the name Inuit. I confess ignorance as to what the "Bushmen" call themselves, but yeah, it would make sense that that's not their true name. (Wapiti?)
Didn't know either term was a slur. I apologize if I offended anyone. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
red dog

Joined: 31 Oct 2004
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, Bushmen was on the list, but I don't think it qualifies as a real racial slur as the site says it refers to Americans -- presumably Americans of all ethnic groups -- since they elected George Bush. Some of the content is extremely offensive, as I said, but some is relatively mild. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cionanian-cro
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, that's rather silly. I have never, ever heard of the Americans referred to as "the Bushmen." Altho I'm sure someone, somewhere, has said it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|