|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dulouz
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Uranus
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:48 am Post subject: Teaching as management - supervisory experience |
|
|
These is a conceptual angle to this but I'm not interested in that. I'd rather here the answer in terms of American HR practices. If I send a resume to an American business and insist I have supervisory experience, will the HR depart agree? Its still not that simple - when one applicant has experience in the exact same occupation setting versus an education setting I would assume the exact same occupation setting applicant gets a plus even when I have had over 1000 students under my charge.
What do you know? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
You must be in a supervisory position. I don't / didn't understand a thing you said......
Not being mean, just doesn't make sense. In particular the phrase "insist I have supervisory experience" Of course they will agree, you should know what kind of experience you have/had. Sounds simple.
Could you elaborate for this blue collar billy.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
plattwaz
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Location: <Write something dumb here>
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not 100% sure what you're asking here, but I *think* you are asking whether or not teaching experience counts as "supervisory" when applying to a position in a business or company....yes/no?
I was an HR Manager for quite a long time, and I would have to say that generally, no, teaching experience is not considered to be supervisory. Supervisory experience within the education sector would involve being Department Head or Head Teacher with other adult employees under your supervision. What you see as "supervising" your students is actually "educating" or "mentoring" and not the same kind of supervision.
Within a business setting supervision most often involves ensuring employees are performing required duties and tasks, perhaps monitoring employee attendance (authorizing vacation time, etc), and taking on more responsibilities than the others in your group or team. Many companies prefer those in supervisory positions to be a little older than other members of the team (or those being supervised) although that can't outright be requested due to employment equity. The supervisor will hold more responsibility when things go wrong, and is often the one responsible for reporting directly to a line manager about the progress of the others. These skills are not directly related to "supervising the educational progress and/or behavior of children." You can insist all you want what experience you have, but if they dont' feel it "qualifies" you, then that's the employer's choice.
That said, occassionally I have overlooked the requirement for supervisory experience, and recommended a candidate for employment that had never been a supervisor before, on the strength of other skills - a personality that I felt was well suited to the added responsibilities. It depends on the job position. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Within a business setting supervision most often involves ensuring employees are performing required duties and tasks, perhaps monitoring employee attendance (authorizing vacation time, etc), and taking on more responsibilities than the others in your group or team. Many companies prefer those in supervisory positions to be a little older than other members of the team (or those being supervised) although that can't outright be requested due to employment equity. The supervisor will hold more responsibility when things go wrong, and is often the one responsible for reporting directly to a line manager about the progress of the others. |
Sure sounds like a teacher's job when you put it that way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dutchman

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: My backyard
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Save your money. It's the most practical thing you will take with you when you leave Korea. Unless you're going into teaching back home your experience here will mean very little to a potential employer. Assume you'll be getting an entry-level position.
Money, save it. It will open many more doors than your ESL teaching experience. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
YoungLi
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| plattwaz wrote: |
I'm not 100% sure what you're asking here, but I *think* you are asking whether or not teaching experience counts as "supervisory" when applying to a position in a business or company....yes/no?
I was an HR Manager for quite a long time, and I would have to say that generally, no, teaching experience is not considered to be supervisory. Supervisory experience within the education sector would involve being Department Head or Head Teacher with other adult employees under your supervision. What you see as "supervising" your students is actually "educating" or "mentoring" and not the same kind of supervision.
Within a business setting supervision most often involves ensuring employees are performing required duties and tasks, perhaps monitoring employee attendance (authorizing vacation time, etc), and taking on more responsibilities than the others in your group or team. Many companies prefer those in supervisory positions to be a little older than other members of the team (or those being supervised) although that can't outright be requested due to employment equity. The supervisor will hold more responsibility when things go wrong, and is often the one responsible for reporting directly to a line manager about the progress of the others. These skills are not directly related to "supervising the educational progress and/or behavior of children." You can insist all you want what experience you have, but if they dont' feel it "qualifies" you, then that's the employer's choice.
That said, occassionally I have overlooked the requirement for supervisory experience, and recommended a candidate for employment that had never been a supervisor before, on the strength of other skills - a personality that I felt was well suited to the added responsibilities. It depends on the job position. |
I agree with this post.... been there done that. I've had employees under my management and I've had students. I'll take the students in class over the employees at work any day. Management is a constant source of agrevation. Employee scheduling is a bear... no one is ever happy with it and you always have people who don't show up then you as the supervisor have to work those hours on a salary or come up with something "creative." Employees steal .....that's a known fact and as a supervisor you are responsible for that theft including the shrink from customers. Upper management is always a pain in the ARSE! HR Department, well they are good with administrative duties mostly... but hiring decisions.... the final decision rests with other department heads. Words of advice to the wise.... go way way around HR when it comes to applying for a position. Find out who's making the decision and contact THAT person directly. I've never heard of anyone getting a good job going thru HR alone. I've been in management and I never got applicants from HR.. they have a tendancy to "hang on" to applications for way too long (if not indefinately) without distributing them to the proper departments. HR people you can laugh now... you know it's true! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
plattwaz
Joined: 08 Apr 2005 Location: <Write something dumb here>
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| YoungLi wrote: |
| I've never heard of anyone getting a good job going thru HR alone. I've been in management and I never got applicants from HR.. they have a tendancy to "hang on" to applications for way too long (if not indefinately) without distributing them to the proper departments. HR people you can laugh now... you know it's true! |
Sure there is an element of truth to that, but it depends onthe company you are working for - size, structure, policies and procedures, etc etc. In my company it was a joint decision by HR and the Department Manager who was hiring. HRs input was usually more in regards to the salary, benefits area -- line managers who often wanted to hire someone specific, but they perhaps needed a wide variety of essential training that the HR Department didn't have the budget for. Or, a person who was requesting a pay of $5,000 more than the budget for the posiiton, etc.
Many times I would sit in on, or conduct interviews together with the line manager to ensure that the candidate was aware of the company structure and policies, while the line manager spelled out job responsibilities.
Again, this depends on the size of the company - but where I worked, I would draft job ads and the line manager would approve them. Resumes might be directed to me, or to the manager, depending on who was busier at that time with various projects. If they went through me, then the whole point was that I sort through them and only present the ones that seemed acceptable to the line manager. S/he could select a number for interviews.
Resumes are also kept on hand by HR for a time period - mine was 6 months, then they were shredded. Often people would send the same resume once a month repeatedly, and yes you could say that the line manager never saw them, but often that's because there are no positions open. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
forgesteel

Joined: 30 Aug 2005 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:46 am Post subject: I would imagine it would depend: but yes, generally speaking |
|
|
Teaching is Management experience
I've done substitute teaching in California. I did it for two years. It is much harder than teaching in Korea (and pays significantly less), even though the regular teacher is generally expected to give you the lesson plan on a silver platter. Kids in America are much more prone to getting into real trouble, and you have WAY less authority in the kids' eyes, and in actual practice. You MUST be a tyrant in order to get the kids to behave reasonably well in America. As a sub, you MUST limit their behavior options radically if you want to work consistently and not get letters written about you from the administration.
That said, I can imagine some high pressure environments, and other variables where your management or supervisory experience might not be all that applicable to the job in question. But generally, your experience is VERY supervisory, and very management related. It is no stretch to claim this. I'd back it up with the latest trendy book on management, and the latest buzzwords in the industry you are applying to. Car dealership mangement is different from restaurant management is different from high tech cubicle mangement, etc. etc. Learn your interested industry's buzzwords, practices, and expectations.
I can't imagine that a restaurant manager applying to a restaurant manager position would NOT be given the job, over you, all other things being equal. Just like you, all other things being equal, will be given the chance to go get a Master's degree before some guy who 'likes the idea' of teaching, but doesn't yet have his Bachelor's degree (asuming you are a legal E-2 visa holder).
It works the same all over. There's horizontal movement and there's vertical movement. Horizontal movement is retaining the same title or employing the same skills to do your job. Vertical movement is undertaking more difficult tasks, and developing different abilities (or conversely, undertaking less difficult tasks).
If you look at what the word management means, no one will doubt that teaching is management experience. Only one 'problem:' it's experience specific to an industry, that is: education. Therefore there is only limited applicability to your mangement skills, that you can apply RIGHT NOW, without some training first. Therefore, if interested in mangeme | | |