View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 1:39 pm Post subject: Re-writing History |
|
|
Think of this as a public service announcement. Those who have been around for a while know about this proposed committee, but new people might not be aware of it yet. The (conservative) Chosun Ilbo published the following editorial about it in today's edition:
A fair approach to history
The Committee to Settle the Past History for Truth and Reconciliation begins its official duty Thursday. Reverend Peter Song Gi-in has been named to head the committee, and the selection of 15 committee members is in its final stage.
The committee has the responsibility of reviewing about 100 years of history from the Japanese colonial government to the term of former President Roh Tae-woo. The committee will begin its four-year term when it starts investigating its first case. As the panel's term can be extended for two more years, it may continue to function beyond 2010.
We have already pointed out the problems with the committee, from the time Reverend Song was nominated as the head. The membership selection is concentrated in a specific region. Plus, Reverend Song is well known as the mentor of President Roh Moo-hyun and we consider it inappropriate for him to head the committee.
In particular, Reverend Song has made a series of remarks that reflect his bias over Korea's modern history. He has made ideologically biased comments, such as "North and South Korea must cooperate first, in order to remove from the peninsula the U.S. Army, which is an obstacle to unification."
Another problem of the committee is that the government recommended eight of its 15 members, who are all politically liberal.
We don't have to quote E. H. Carr's definition of history as "perpetual dialogue between the present and the past." History depends on each historian's interpretation of the past facts. In other words, past facts can be freely manipulated according to the historian. This is the very reason that the committee concerns us.
When the committee recklessly digs up the past, with a biased ideology and wrong standard of values, the orthodox identity of the nation can be stirred up from its very roots.
The activity of the committee must stay true to its name, focused on the truth and reconciliation. If it tries to overturn history to settle its own past grudges, it will only fail to win public recognition. If a government tries to rewrite history as it likes whenever the nation sees a change of power, it will only lead to a waste of national power.
Therefore, an academic approach is needed, rather than political approaches, and once the committee begins its job, it has to do it perfectly, so that there is no more controversy over historical issues from now on. The committee must exclude any outside influence, political or ideological, completely. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, such a sensible and objective newspaper...
Quote: |
The committee must exclude any outside influence, political or ideological, completely. |
Yeah, best of luck with that.
I can see why they are upset- 8 of 15 members are politically liberal!!!
Why, that's 53.3% of the committee! Those bastards! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I take it from your response that you are in favor of this committee. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Demonicat

Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll admit it! Its true! The US is blocking the Unification of Korea! If we were to leave and take our big nasty guns, then North Korea would happily come down and join their brethren. Sure, they would be riding in tanks and carrying kalishnakovs, but hey! They're family! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is a short story around somewhere, I think by John Steinbeck. It's set in Norway. The Nazis come to occupy the village. The mayor has to make a decision. To what degree can he cooperate with them before he becomes a collaborator?
This committee is going to look at hundred year old situations and pass judgement. Some people think the purpose is to destroy the reputations and/or political careers of the grandchildren. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
panthermodern

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Location: Taxronto
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
History has been, is, and always will be, fluid and subject to interpertation.
Look of the blessings of the unhistoric |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
History has been, is, and always will be, fluid and subject to interpertation. |
Are you saying that history is nothing more than propaganda? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I take it from your response that you are in favor of this committee. |
Well, the Chosun Ilbo is in favour of the committee as long as the the majority of the committee is not 'politically liberal'. So heck, if it's good enough for the Chosun Ilbo, it's sure good enough for a waeguk like me.
So am I really for the committee?
You betcha!
It's got very high entertainment value possibilities!
If you meant to ask whether I'm worried that the committee will drastically revise history as Koreans know it, well, no.
They already accomplish that without such a committee anyway.
At least a committee brings it out in the open where
1) we can all keep an eye on it (at least as long as you keep updating us, so the heavy burden falls to you, buddy boy!) and
2) opposing forces (as already illustrated in the Chosun Ilbo) will keep it from accomplishing anything of substance.
[please don't make me have to add a smilely] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Well, the Chosun Ilbo is in favour of the committee as long as the the majority of the committee is not 'politically liberal'. So heck, if it's good enough for the Chosun Ilbo, it's sure good enough for a waeguk like me.
So am I really for the committee?
You betcha!
It's got very high entertainment value possibilities!
If you meant to ask whether I'm worried that the committee will drastically revise history as Koreans know it, well, no.
They already accomplish that without such a committee anyway.
At least a committee brings it out in the open where
1) we can all keep an eye on it (at least as long as you keep updating us, so the heavy burden falls to you, buddy boy!) and
2) opposing forces (as already illustrated in the Chosun Ilbo) will keep it from accomplishing anything of substance. |
My understanding is that the Chosun Ilbo objected to having the committee. When the National Assembly did create the committee, the Chosun campaigned for it to be non-partisan. They kind of lost that arguement, too.
I can see your point about the entertainment value, although I suspect it will be far more entertaining from the opposite side of the Pacific, like you are. I'll go out on a limb here and say that digging up and publicizing long-forgotten stories will be used to stir up anti-Japanese and anti-American sentiment as well as to brow-beat the GNP and the chaebols. This will be a form of McCarthyism.
The only good news about this thing is that the Uri Party has shown itself to be spectacularly inept in everything they have tried. The first two victims of this policy were Uri members whose grandfathers turned out to have been on the wrong side of history. That was worth a chuckle.
My question is what possible good can come of having a 5-year license to whip the public into a xenophobic frenzy? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As indicated by the tiny postscript my post was entirely tongue in cheek.
But I didn't get the impression that the Chosun Ilbo objected to the idea of the committee rather they objected to the perceived slant it will have.
Quote: |
My question is what possible good can come of having a 5-year license to whip the public into a xenophobic frenzy? |
As opposed to the current unlicensed xenophobic frenzy?
It's hard to imagine that such a committee could possibly do any more damage than is already being done... but where there's a will there's always a way. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
the tiny postscript |
I need to get my bifocals cleaned again. I missed the postscript. (I did think you were speaking out of character, but everyone has opinions that seem contradictory.)
It wasn't evident in this piece that the Chosun editors disapproved of the committee. It was evident last year when the National Assembly was debating setting it up. Not too surprising since they will be one of the targets.
Quote: |
As opposed to the current unlicensed xenophobic frenzy? |
There are spasms of it every couple of months, as you note, but I'm talking 2002-size that doesn't blow over in a week or two. I also believe the xenophobia is just the tool of choice to beat the GNP over the head. They are the real target of this campaign. The goal is to create a one-party state. Make a note: There will be an October Surprise in '08. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|