View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:17 pm Post subject: "And" or "But"... starting sentences... |
|
|
I read a while back on this board that some said they disliked, or that it was improper, to start a sentence with "And" or "But" (maybe "Yet" and a few other similar words are disagreeable to some).
Then I noticed the newpaper. The newspaper starts sentences and paragraphs with these words all the time.
Now, this is just a simple discussion forum.
But if it's good enough for the NY Times why not accept it here? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree you can't make a hard and fast rule that one shouldn't start sentences with conjunctions like 'And' or 'But'. The problem is students start sentences using 'And' and 'But' thinking that it works just like '����' and '����' when it doesn't. Native speaker children with immature style often use sequence markers like 'Then' or 'Next', which seem to me would better convey their intended meaning. Native speaker adults are able to use 'And' or 'But' to begin sentences but know it is bad style to use them repeatedly and are also aware that there is a choice between starting a new sentence with a conjunction or writing a compound sentence. Students often opt for the former by default and, most importantly, don't realise that a pause, as indicated by the full stop, has an effect in English. In other words, in order to be able to begin sentences with conjunctions without sounding awkward they need to know a lot more than they do about intonation and stress and how they affect meaning. That's bloody difficult to teach so it's easier just to ban the whole thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Privateer wrote: |
I agree you can't make a hard and fast rule that one shouldn't start sentences with conjunctions like 'And' or 'But'. The problem is students start sentences using 'And' and 'But' thinking that it works just like '����' and '����' when it doesn't. Native speaker children with immature style often use sequence markers like 'Then' or 'Next', which seem to me would better convey their intended meaning. Native speaker adults are able to use 'And' or 'But' to begin sentences but know it is bad style to use them repeatedly and are also aware that there is a choice between starting a new sentence with a conjunction or writing a compound sentence. Students often opt for the former by default and, most importantly, don't realise that a pause, as indicated by the full stop, has an effect in English. In other words, in order to be able to begin sentences with conjunctions without sounding awkward they need to know a lot more than they do about intonation and stress and how they affect meaning. That's bloody difficult to teach so it's easier just to ban the whole thing. |
Cool, but you responded about the issue as it relates to teaching, and the OP was talking about the use of these words here on the forum.
Im aware of the rule. However I find that in non formal writing this feature can soften the effect and make it more casual speach. Dropping these markers either forces you to make a compound sentence, which can also get tiring if not broken up with shorter sentences, or it makes the sentence a lot more blunt. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
better than "So"
IMO |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
manlyboy

Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Location: Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In spoken Aussie slang, it's becoming inceasingly popular to actually end sentences with the word but. A few days ago, someone said to me: "Teaching here sucks. The money's pretty good but." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's a matter of style. It's informal. However, "however" is much better to use than "but". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ratslash

Joined: 08 May 2003
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
'but' and 'and' are conjunctions - they should be used to join.
but, informally i don't see what harm it can do. but, there will be some that say 'but these bulletin boards represent the english teaching communities and therefore everybody should write grammatically correct english'.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ryst Helmut

Joined: 26 Apr 2003 Location: In search of the elusive signature...
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
It drives me nuts, but it is permitted. I was taught that it was improper, however as English has (naturally) morphed...it's become acceptable.
Hogwash I say! Down with the infidels!!!
But it has some merit....
!shoosh
Ryst |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Satori wrote: |
Privateer wrote: |
I agree you can't make a hard and fast rule that one shouldn't start sentences with conjunctions like 'And' or 'But'. The problem is students start sentences using 'And' and 'But' thinking that it works just like '����' and '����' when it doesn't. Native speaker children with immature style often use sequence markers like 'Then' or 'Next', which seem to me would better convey their intended meaning. Native speaker adults are able to use 'And' or 'But' to begin sentences but know it is bad style to use them repeatedly and are also aware that there is a choice between starting a new sentence with a conjunction or writing a compound sentence. Students often opt for the former by default and, most importantly, don't realise that a pause, as indicated by the full stop, has an effect in English. In other words, in order to be able to begin sentences with conjunctions without sounding awkward they need to know a lot more than they do about intonation and stress and how they affect meaning. That's bloody difficult to teach so it's easier just to ban the whole thing. |
Cool, but you responded about the issue as it relates to teaching, and the OP was talking about the use of these words here on the forum.
Im aware of the rule. However I find that in non formal writing this feature can soften the effect and make it more casual speach. Dropping these markers either forces you to make a compound sentence, which can also get tiring if not broken up with shorter sentences, or it makes the sentence a lot more blunt. |
Oh well I posted that in the small hours so I didn't realize. If we're just talking about what's acceptable on this forum then hell yeah you can start sentences with conjunctions. You can also split infinitives, use slang, and even be careless with spelling if you really must. The one thing you can't do is start posting like a student, cos we all get enough of that kind of English at work.
In that second bit you wrote I'm not really sure what you mean. But I think you mean sentences like this are blunt. And they are. But too much bluntness can be bad. etc etc |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hater Depot
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ryst Helmut wrote: |
It drives me nuts, but it is permitted. I was taught that it was improper, however as English has (naturally) morphed...it's become acceptable.
Hogwash I say! Down with the infidels!!!
But it has some merit.... |
Choose your favorite classical author... I'm sure you can find several examples easily.
It has merit when used properly -- when it would be ok to make it a single sentence, but breaking it up puts more emphasis on the clause following and/but. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
n3ptne
Joined: 14 Sep 2005 Location: Poh*A*ng City
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Informally? But has been used, revolutionarily I might add, to start sentences for the last hundred years by just about ever literary great. English is not a language that adheres to strict rules, the essence of English is to break rules. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
n3ptne wrote: |
Informally? But has been used, revolutionarily I might add, to start sentences for the last hundred years by just about ever literary great. English is not a language that adheres to strict rules, the essence of English is to break rules. |
The essence of English is to communicate and make yourself understood. If you break too many rules, no one will bother to read you.
By informal I mean not formal, as in the academic English our students will be expected to produce in future. We're not paid to recreate Thomas Pynchons. We're, in my view, paid to create future Samsung execs who need to communicate with the outside world in a manner that doesn't make it seem like they learned their English on Buddy Buddy.
Last edited by mindmetoo on Wed Dec 21, 2005 10:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Moldy Rutabaga

Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Ansan, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose the reasoning is that beginning a sentence with and tempts you to either write a fragment sentence: "And then we went to the disco." or to use the conjunction solely as a pause: "And, E Hyo Lee is really hot besides." The proper use is to use it with a multiple clause sentence: "And as we don't have time to eat supper, let's go pick up a pizza."
I would avoid the use in writing, but if people understand you in conversation, it's fair game. Any of us who read the drivel Korean English newspapers print shouldn't model ourselves on what journalists write.
Ken:> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
n3ptne wrote: |
Informally? But has been used, revolutionarily I might add, to start sentences for the last hundred years by just about ever literary great. English is not a language that adheres to strict rules, the essence of English is to break rules. |
Wow, some of my students have really grasped the essence of English then!
Sorry but I think that statement is just a cop-out that excuses people from thinking about how the language really works. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
n3ptne
Joined: 14 Sep 2005 Location: Poh*A*ng City
|
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just a cop out on how the language really works? Inform James Joyce. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|