|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 4:26 pm Post subject: More Calls for Rumsfeld's Resignation... |
 |
|
| Quote: |
Citing an atmosphere of "arrogance" among the top civilian leaders at the Pentagon, another retired general is calling for the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Retired Maj. Gen. John Riggs sees fault in the handling of the military's involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"I think he should step aside and let someone step in who can be more realistic," Riggs told NPR's Michele Norris on Thursday.
Riggs served in the Army for 39 years, attaining the rank of three-star general. He was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for his actions as a helicopter pilot during Vietnam. He retired in 2005 with the loss of one star in rank after the Army said he had misused contractors.
Riggs said Rumsfeld and his civilian subordinates do not listen to, or even seek, the advice of professional military officers, except when it is convenient.
"They only need the military advice when it satisfies their agenda," Riggs said. "I think that's a mistake, and that's why I think he should resign."
Riggs says he thinks the military needs more troops on the ground in Iraq to successfully stabilize the country.
"I think what happened is that we just grossly underestimated the number of soldiers required for the stability phase," Riggs said.
"As a soldier I supported the war in Iraq," Riggs wrote in an e-mail, answering a follow-up question Thursday afternoon. "What I did not support was the way it was being mis/micromanaged by [Office of the Secretary of Defense-Rumsfeld]. Not sure what his agenda was, but it certainly was not to dominate and stabilize the situation on the ground."
Four other retired generals have come out in favor of Rumsfeld's resignation. On Thursday, The Washington Post quoted retired Maj. Gen. John Batiste as saying the Pentagon needed a change in its leadership. Batiste commanded the Army's 1st Infantry Division in Iraq in 2004-05, something that gives his opinion more weight, according to Riggs.
The Post article also notes three other prominent Rumsfeld critics among the ranks of the recently retired: Marine Lt. Gen. Gregory Newbold, director of operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 2000-2002; retired Army Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, who supervised Iraqi troop training in 2003-2004; and retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni, who was chief of the U.S. Central Command (overseeing Iraq and the rest of the Middle East) in the late 1990s.
Rumsfeld has publicly said that he has offered his resignation to President Bush in the past. The president has refused his offer to leave the Pentagon. |
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5340711
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/13/iraq.rumsfeld/index.html
Last edited by Gopher on Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:27 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SirFink
Joined: 05 Mar 2006
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 5:57 pm Post subject: Re: More Calls for Rumsfeld's Resignation... |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
If you go to war, you must give much weight to what your theater and ground commanders advise. Failure to do so shows poor judgment.
|
On the other hand, if your plan was to create a war that would turn into a quagmire that would never end and cost $1 trillion dollars and you and your friends stood to benefit financially from such a war... it would show good judgment, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[deleted]
Last edited by Gopher on Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mithridates
Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| SirFink wrote: |
| On the other hand, if your plan was to create a war that would turn into a quagmire that would never end and cost $1 trillion dollars and you and your friends stood to benefit financially from such a war... it would show good judgment, right? |
Hmm.
The way that you so quickly hijacked this thread, the way you so obviously resorted to sarcasm fueled by antiwar bitterness to articulate your view, is an excellent illustration of everything that is wrong with the Current Events forum.
Can you think of no other way to state your view that Rumsfeld's leadership is not the issue than what you said above? I believe your point is that it is not so much Rumsfeld and his incompetence as it is the President, "his friends," and what you seem to believe is a cynical war contrived mostly for personal profit or for the profit of U.S. elites, correct?
Why was it necessary to state that view sarcastically? |
Gentle, gentle. Use the fine art of rehijacking a thread instead.
Although I'm not sure what to say about Rumsfeld. It doesn't really get much worse than him but I have no idea how to get rid of him. Do you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mithridates wrote: |
| ...I have no idea how to get rid of him. Do you? |
Political appointees, once confirmed by Congress, serve entirely at the pleasure of the President.
Last edited by Gopher on Mon Jun 12, 2006 5:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bulsajo
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I remember Rumsfeld offered his resignation, and Bush refused to accept it.
If I remember correctly it was before the election, so maybe spring or summer of 2004?
When Bush refused, many (including me) figured that it was practically a punitive move, forcing Rumsfeld to stay and clean up the mess he made.
Now... more confused than ever by that.
Obviously it was a vote of confidence rather than a punitive measure, as hard as that is to comprehend.
But Bush has- I believe I recall hearing- shuffled his cabinet and advisory positions less than any other president (I don't know if that's 'ever' or 'in recent history').
As for SirFink's post- sure that's a totally crazy idea, but at the same time it's a lot less crazy than some of the things the average conspiracy theorist seems willing to believe these days. Not to give any real credibility to the idea, but I think it was bound to pop up in a discussion about Rumsfeld at some point anyway, so now it's out and we can move on.
Iraqis themselves have some pretty wild conspiracy theories about Americans (and jews of course). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SirFink
Joined: 05 Mar 2006
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gopher wrote: |
| Can you think of no other way to state your view that Rumsfeld's leadership is not the issue than what you said above? |
It is the issue. My point is that his supposed incompetence is a ruse. Would you rather be simply fired for incompetence or be brought up on war crimes and impeached and imprisoned for intentionally planning a war poorly so that you and your friends can benefit financially from it at the cost of countless lives?
Why the sarcasm? To conceal the ire I feel not just for Rumsfeld but for the folks who are falling for this "he should resign cuz he's an idiot!" propaganda. While we laugh at "Rummy" jokes on the Daily Show, he'll be laughing all the way to the bank and retirement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SirFink wrote: |
| Gopher wrote: |
| Can you think of no other way to state your view that Rumsfeld's leadership is not the issue than what you said above? |
It is the issue. My point is that his supposed incompetence is a ruse. Would you rather be simply fired for incompetence or be brought up on war crimes and impeached and imprisoned for intentionally planning a war poorly so that you and your friends can benefit financially from it at the cost of countless lives?
Why the sarcasm? To conceal the ire I feel not just for Rumsfeld but for the folks who are falling for this "he should resign cuz he's an idiot!" propaganda. While we laugh at "Rummy" jokes on the Daily Show, he'll be laughing all the way to the bank and retirement. |
Gopher's right, although, I might have dealt with your hijacking a little differently. Dude, he doesn't have to be malevolent to make a lot of money. He's hooked up no matter what happens. I tend to believe that he's just honestly incompetent and arrogant. |
|
| Back to top |
| |
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
