|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gopher
Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:16 pm Post subject: Latin Americans' "Nothing Gringo" MayDay Boycott |
 |
|
| Quote: |
MEXICO CITY, Mexico (AP) -- U.S. lobbyists lashed out Wednesday at the Mexican "Nothing Gringo" campaign timed for May 1 to coincide with the "Day Without Immigrants" boycott in the United States.
The American Chamber of Commerce in Mexico said organizers are risking a backlash and foolishly targeting some of their best allies, since U.S. corporations have actively lobbied the U.S. Congress for immigration reform including legalization for many of the estimated 11 million undocumented migrants.
Mexicans' refusal to "buy American" on May 1 could further polarize the debate and make reform supporters seem anti-American at the very moment that lobbyists are trying to persuade lawmakers in Washington to pass a bill that would benefit migrants, worries Larry Rubin, the chamber's president.
"This is like shooting oneself in the foot," Rubin said. "U.S. companies have been the first to lobby, launching a huge lobbying effort for immigration reform. ... Why hurt something that is helping you?"
Migrants and their supporters in the United States are being encouraged to skip work and school and not spend money for one day to demonstrate the migrants' importance to the U.S. economy.
South of the border, Mexicans are targeting American stores and chain restaurants -- "That means no Dunkin' Donuts, no McDonald's, Burger King, Starbucks, Sears, Krispy Kreme or Wal-Mart," reads one e-mail making the rounds.
But even activists are confused about which companies are U.S.-owned. Sears is cited by boycott organizers, despite the fact that Sears' Mexico stores were bought by Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim in 1997. And few organizers mention Vips -- the chain of ubiquitous Mexican diners -- even though they are owned by Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
A quarter of Mexico's formal private-sector jobs with regular pay are provided by U.S. firms, according to the chamber, including Walmex, the Mexican Wal-Mart subsidiary that is the nation's biggest private employer with 140,000 workers. Delphi Corp., the U.S. auto parts maker, is second with 70,000 workers.
"Certainly, companies could be hurt," Rubin said at a news conference Wednesday.
The chamber represents more than 2,000 American and other foreign companies doing business in Mexico, and says its members are responsible for $100 billion of investment in the country.
The companies say they're helping Mexico by providing jobs, but activists counter they pay so little that Mexicans have little choice but to head north.
Backers of the Mexican boycott insisted Wednesday that the protest could send a message that American companies should offer better pay and benefits to their Mexican workers.
"They continue to exploit Mexicans with badly paid jobs and no labor rights," said Roberto Vigil, who works in the Mexico City office of the California-based immigrants rights group Hermandad Mexicana. "They're kind of two-faced: they support, but they exploit."
Unskilled workers at U.S. companies usually start with Mexico's minimum wage of $4.35 a day. While many earn more, such as seamstresses making an average of $5.89 a day -- even these wages pale in comparison to paychecks offered by the same companies north of the border, conceded the chamber's Humberto Banuelos.
A cashier at Subway (or "sandwich artist," as the company refers to them) earns about $189 a month in Mexico City. In Colorado, Subway cashiers make four times that -- $824.
Companies also often hire workers for three-month periods to avoid paying health insurance or other benefits, activists say.
"Yes, we are aware that they are the largest employers in the Mexican republic, but they are paying crumbs," said Martha Suarez Cantu, coordinator of Alianza Braceroproa, a Mexican labor-rights group helping organize the boycott.
The only way to stem immigration is to narrow the income gap between the two countries, said Robert Pastor, director of the Center for North American Studies at American University in Washington. He pointed to the European Union, where migration slowed after heavy investment reduced the income gap in its poorer countries.
Washington does not invest directly in job creation in Mexico. The U.S. Agency for International Development gave Mexico $31 million last year, but it went toward scholarships, tuberculosis, AIDS prevention and advice to lending institutions.
But raising wages would cause Mexico to lose ground to countries with cheaper labor, such as China and India. Felix Boni, director of equity research at Scotiabank's Mexican brokerage firm, suggested boosting Mexico's productivity and job growth.
"U.S. aid is not going to do it," Boni said. "It doesn't make sense to pour money into something that's broken. Mexico needs to make structural changes." |
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/04/26/mexico.america.ap/index.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yo!Chingo
Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: Seoul Korea
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I read on MSN that the whole concept is backfiring on them, and alot of people seeing these speeches and rallys on TV are joining the minutemen group in response. What used to look like other people's problems is suddenly alot closer to home for many Americans.
These illegals aren't even smart enough to realise that the company's they're boycotting are the idiots trying to get them the right to stay! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
May 1st is the founding of the Illuminati.
All just a coincidence of course  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CoolTeach
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Location: Back in the USSR
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:32 pm Post subject: Better pay and benefits. |
|
|
gfd
Last edited by CoolTeach on Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:34 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yo!Chingo wrote: |
I read on MSN that the whole concept is backfiring on them, and a lot of people seeing these speeches and rallies on TV are joining the minutemen group in response. What used to look like other people's problems is suddenly a lot closer to home for many Americans.
These illegals aren't even smart enough to realise that the company's they're boycotting are the idiots trying to get them the right to stay! |
Yeah it seems like a bad move.
But this from Bush makes my blood boil:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/arts/national/2006/04/28/anthem-spanish-bush.html
No singing the national anthem in Spanish? WTF? Did freedom of speech just go out the window? Some British music producer does a version in Spanish and this warrants a second of the precious grey matter of the "shouldn't I be keeping America safe" president? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Leslie Cheswyck
Joined: 31 May 2003
Location: University of Western Chile
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it already was sung in Spanish.
Jose, can you see...? 
I think GW was merely offering his personal opinion, which I tend to share.
On the other hand, maybe they ought to record the song in every known language on Earth. I bet it would sound real cool in Klingon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Yo!Chingo
Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Location: Seoul Korea
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Leslie Cheswyck wrote: |
| On the other hand, maybe they ought to record the song in every known language on Earth. I bet it would sound real cool in Klingon. |
On Earth, Leslie Cheswyck, on Earth! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cazador83
Joined: 28 Feb 2006
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| Yo!Chingo wrote: |
I read on MSN that the whole concept is backfiring on them, and a lot of people seeing these speeches and rallies on TV are joining the minutemen group in response. What used to look like other people's problems is suddenly a lot closer to home for many Americans.
These illegals aren't even smart enough to realise that the company's they're boycotting are the idiots trying to get them the right to stay! |
Yeah it seems like a bad move.
But this from Bush makes my blood boil:
http://www.cbc.ca/story/arts/national/2006/04/28/anthem-spanish-bush.html
No singing the national anthem in Spanish? WTF? Did freedom of speech just go out the window? Some British music producer does a version in Spanish and this warrants a second of the precious grey matter of the "shouldn't I be keeping America safe" president? |
he didnt say nobody COULDNT, he just said he thinks it should be in english, since thats what we speak in america you know (and yes i know its not an official language). but what really pisses me off is that they didnt just translate it into Spanish, they totally added their own propanda into the song!
Last edited by cazador83 on Sun Apr 30, 2006 9:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
| |
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
