|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RokofKangnam

Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Location: Between a ROK and a Hard Place
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not exactly my cup of tea, but I do like the blue one.
Last edited by RokofKangnam on Wed May 31, 2006 9:27 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Who would buy an SUV these days? Can't people see the writing on the wall? Gas prices aren't going anywhere but up folks...
That Toyota is gross...looks like it needs to use the toilet...or give birth. Looks nothing like the older, very cool version. The "retro" thing is about recycling, that's all. Recycling past boxes with the '00 bloatation.
Koreans and SUVs are even more irresponsible. At least in the States, one can actually use an SUV for more than hauling the wife and kid to the steps at the foot of the 'mountain' at Chuseok. Nothing like seeing gas at $1.50 per litre, and huge Kyrons (the world's ugliest plastic earth shuttle) pounding down the highway with one person in them.
People just won't change, will they? Not until gas is $8.00 per litre. Like cigarettes. Everyone said, "Man, when they hit $2.00, I'm quitting!". Then the same speech at $3.00, then $4.00, 5, 6, and now, in Canada, $10.00, and people still smoke.
Part of the problem is the design of the small cars. Who on earth wants to be seen driving a Matiz, besides a young mother in the E-Mart parking lot? Or a Tico? Small means lame in Korea. Haven't seen many 'cool' small cars here that weren't imports. I think until they start making something that doesn't look like an egg with go-cart tires, the trend will just continue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Demophobe wrote: |
Who would buy an SUV these days? Can't people see the writing on the wall? Gas prices aren't going anywhere but up folks...
That Toyota is gross...looks like it needs to use the toilet...or give birth. Looks nothing like the older, very cool version. The "retro" thing is about recycling, that's all. Recycling past boxes with the '00 bloatation.
Koreans and SUVs are even more irresponsible. At least in the States, one can actually use an SUV for more than hauling the wife and kid to the steps at the foot of the 'mountain' at Chuseok. Nothing like seeing gas at $1.50 per litre, and huge Kyrons (the world's ugliest plastic earth shuttle) pounding down the highway with one person in them.
People just won't change, will they? Not until gas is $8.00 per litre. Like cigarettes. Everyone said, "Man, when they hit $2.00, I'm quitting!". Then the same speech at $3.00, then $4.00, 5, 6, and now, in Canada, $10.00, and people still smoke.
Part of the problem is the design of the small cars. Who on earth wants to be seen driving a Matiz, besides a young mother in the E-Mart parking lot? Or a Tico? Small means lame in Korea. Haven't seen many 'cool' small cars here that weren't imports. I think until they start making something that doesn't look like an egg with go-cart tires, the trend will just continue. |
I agree with all these points. It seems lemming-like to buy SUV's with bigger and bigger engines.
Sure, if there were no oil-exploitation by the middle-eastern countries, and there was no such thing as the Greenhouse Effect, then I too would love to have 6 liters of raw power in front of me and be surrounded by all that steel. It's a good feeling. Very empowering. I really do love powerful cars. But, I've decided that I will never own a vehicle with a large gas engine.
Until I can afford one of the new hybrid cars I've set the limit at 1.6 liter. That's plenty for what I need. I drive a Daewoo Lanos (1.5 liter) now. It has no performance whatsoever and is really boring to drive. A real stinker of a car.
But I don't want my grandchildren pointing their finger at me in 50 years and asking, "why were you so stupid?". "You knew about global warming but you still went out and bought the biggest SUV you could!!". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
No doubt.
I.ve had a lot of cars in my life, and some really cool ones too. Now I have a '94 Elantra. Cheap (my stereo was more) and doesn't burn any oil, so I think it's alright.
My wife and I share a 1 hour commute (2 both ways) daily, and spend about (modest estimate) 300,000 won per month on gas. This is in her Musso, a diesel, something I bought for her protection, and doing the math, it's about 3.6 million per year on gas. About $3600 per year. If we were to use 2 cars, which would be far more convenient, we would be looking at a collective 8 million on gas. $8000 per year to get to work!
Really absurd.
It's about choices we made for jobs, so it's our own fault that we face these costs, but it really brings home the incredible cost of car ownership. As cities get larger, 1 hour will seem like nothing. Heck, in many cities, it already is nothing. It also underlines how frivilous our ideas about cars and gas really are. This is a serious issue on many levels. Personal; the money, global; the pollution, and the general short-sightedness of people; the incredible waste of driving distances daily with a half-empty Musso. We are both guilty in this matter, yet, currently, can't do anything about it.
We are trying however, and are making every effort to minimize the impact of our actions. Slower acceleration and overall speed, regular maintenance to keep the car running well and burning clean, seeking car pools, and inconveniencing ourselves to save in all areas.
We really should buy a smaller car, but as I said, the Musso is for my wife's safety. The highways here are really, really dangerous. Smaller cars that use diesel are not around...another idiocy. Diesel engines aren't necessarily greater polluters than gas, run longer, and the fuel is overall, easier to produce.
Anyways, I had a sweet ride a long time ago...a 1977 Toyota Celica GT Liftback. Rebuilt the engine with a buddy, new paint at my body shop (deep metallic blue), interior, wheels...it was sweet until it met those guardrails at 110mph.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jensen

Joined: 30 Mar 2003 Location: hippie hell
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can't agree entirely with the comments on how bad SUV's are. SUVs are safer than small cars (for the SUV occupants). SUVs can be used for passengers and light hauling...better for the environment than manufacturing two vehicles for separate purposes. A four-runner with a trailer is a decent replacement for a pickup. Like a lot of other people, I drive an SUV because I need a fairly heavy duty 4X4 vehicle for bad roads and bad weather and where I live there is plenty of both.
Looked over a demo FJ Cruiser a couple of weeks ago, and they are tempting. Unfortunately you can't get them with a four cylinder engine, or without power windows...so I don't want one anymore. And I still think if the top doesn't come off, it isn't a "Cruiser."
Guess I'll keep my '85 4-runner for a few more years, it's a nice winter ride but I wish it had locking differentials...and even with the four-banger it only gets a little over 20 mpg. I think the FJCruiser is supposed to get close to that.
When I don't need 4wd, my daily driver is a 30+ mpg '79 Datsun 210 wagon...somebody here once told me they are called "Sunny"s in Australia(?). I've had a number of them over the years, all beaters that I coax back to life. Wish I could go back in time and buy one brand new, they are fun little cars.[/i] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Demophobe

Joined: 17 May 2004
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jensen wrote: |
Can't agree entirely with the comments on how bad SUV's are. SUVs are safer than small cars (for the SUV occupants). SUVs can be used for passengers and light hauling...better for the environment than manufacturing two vehicles for separate purposes. A four-runner with a trailer is a decent replacement for a pickup. Like a lot of other people, I drive an SUV because I need a fairly heavy duty 4X4 vehicle for bad roads and bad weather and where I live there is plenty of both.
|
While you may not agree, you also don't seem to disagree.
I don't think anyone could argue aganst them being safer, and that's why I bought one for my wife. There will never be a time when all cars are one type. Smaller cars will always win over SUVs in mileage.
If one really needs an SUV, then ok...what can you do? I guess my statements were based on what would probably be 80% of SUV buyers, who never exploit its capabilities, or, in fact, intended use. They just drive on roads and highways, with the only "off-road" being the parking lot of the restaurant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Camry is for what Demo was talking about. The 4runner was paid off almost two years ago, I'm slowly adding things (Thule top rack - winch - husky liner) but they cost money, and I have to make it on an allowance. Also, demo, you didn't mention how expensive 4wheel driving can become when things go wrong. Being that the 4runner is my ride to work, and daddy's not paying the bills, 4wheeling is reserved for maybe 2-3 times a year.
Now if I was making 100 g's plus a year like Richinkorea, then I'd do a lot more off roading, but I don't, so I don't get to do that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
animalbirdfish
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
My first car was an '81 Celica GT with the 22-R. What a workhorse. Helluva fun car to drive (and with a crank moon-roof) and economical. I'm a loyal Toyota/Honda fan (the Accord LX-i hatchbacks I had were even better than the Celica).
But Superfly - as much as I'd like to side with you, I sympathize with the wife on this matter. It's always seemed shortsighted to me to go into debt for anything other than a house or a college degree. Save money, buy slightly used, pay cash. You take such a hit in depreciation when you buy a new vehicle. Wait a year or two until some folks start trading in their '06 models and then pay cash for what is admittedly a good-looking rig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I saw one of those new FJ240s the other day- it looked pretty nice. In a sort of British-racing/mustard yellowish colour. I was surprised at how small it was- the pictures I saw here gave me the impression it was much bigger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ugh. I don't know how to say this. I convinced myself I couldnt live without one and bought it this morning.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[in a loud cutsie voice]
I know a doggie whose tail is wagging, don't I!
Yes I do!
Yes I doooo!
Who's a good doggie?
Who's a good doggie?
Good boy!
So, what colour? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
animalbirdfish
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SuperFly wrote: |
Ugh. I don't know how to say this. I convinced myself I couldnt live without one and bought it this morning.  |
How's the wife feel about that one? Not sure I'd want to be standing in your shoes when she found out.
(But, hell, at least post a pic so we can all know why we're envious) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Got the voodoo blue, she's cool, everything is great and I'm a lucky guy... Made a few adjustments (quit smoking 5 bucks a pack - been 48 hours but everything is good)
Pics of Ulee in his doggles in the drivers seat soon promise. 
Last edited by SuperFly on Thu May 11, 2006 3:13 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SuperFly

Joined: 09 Jul 2003 Location: In the doghouse
|
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Demo, we live about 2 miles from her work and about 14 from mine. The Toy is going to give me about 17mpg in the city if I keep it under 40mph - not hard to do.
You mentioned the musso and saftey for your wife. Me too. Road rage, flying rocks, car jackers, you name it, we got it here. Phoenix is rated number 1 in the nation for road rage. I'd rather be driving a small package like this or the 4runner or the Landcruiser than some of the American built SUVs though. Those things are f'n huge.
here's the pic you wanted brother animalbirdfish
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|