View previous topic :: View next topic |
"Ya mon, is ganga an aphrodisiac mon?" |
Certainly not. Don't be ridiculous! |
|
45% |
[ 5 ] |
Yeah, you know what I'm talkin' 'bout. |
|
54% |
[ 6 ] |
|
Total Votes : 11 |
|
Author |
Message |
Cohiba

Joined: 01 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 2:12 am Post subject: "Ya mon, is ganga an aphrodisiac mon?" |
|
|
Well, is it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
You feel more amorous but are actually less able to function properly. A bit like alcahol. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jaganath69

Joined: 17 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Never had a problem functioning on it when I were a lad. Only problem was the myriad of distractions it caused in my mind thus delaying climax. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tiger fancini

Joined: 21 Mar 2006 Location: Testicles for Eyes
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Try it and see  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
deessell

Joined: 08 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, and ask me next week when I have left Korea for ever and are relaxing in Thailand.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tiberious aka Sparkles

Joined: 23 Jan 2003 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's no conceivable reason why anyone (the elderly excluded) would need drugs to enhance sex. It's sex for godsakes!
Sparkles*_* |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hermes.trismegistus

Joined: 08 Sep 2005
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Strictly speaking, from a psychopharmacological perspective, it does not classify as an aphrodesiac.
It can amplify, as with most psychedelics, but it cannot create out of void. You might reference RAW's Sex and Drugs, in which he discusses such issues.
Namaste. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Satori

Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Location: Above it all
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why do I do it?
What can it be?
There's naughtiness in everyone
But twice as much in me... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SirFink

Joined: 05 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
For women? Yes. For men it's the opposite. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazykiwi

Joined: 07 Jun 2003 Location: new zealand via daejeon
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Haha, YES YES YES!
I know it is. I am living proof it is. Both parties! Oh yes, I love makin the love on the green green grass of home (or anywhere else for that matter). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seoulsucker

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: The Land of the Hesitant Cutoff
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hermes.trismegistus wrote: |
Strictly speaking, from a psychopharmacological perspective, it does not classify as an aphrodesiac. |
Dude, you just totally sucked the life out of this thread with that psychobabble.
I dated a gal in college who was all about bong hits and BJ's for breakfast. Helluva way to wake up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cubanlord

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Location: In Japan!
|
Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Last time I checked, it was called Ganja.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vandyshannon
Joined: 30 Apr 2006 Location: Jeonju
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 7:20 am Post subject: well maybe |
|
|
A former boyfriend of mine was always super handsy when he was high but he'd get too relaxed and couldn't really close the deal. Maybe it just depends on the person. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jacl
Joined: 31 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not really, but if you lie on the couch long enough, something's bound to happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|