|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 8:46 am Post subject: 'Kyoto' Is Pointless, say phd's |
|
|
Kyoto is pointless, say 60 leading scientists
4 Apr 2006 - In an open letter to Canada 's new Conservative prime minister,
Stephen Harper, more than 60 leading international climate change experts have
asked him to review the global warming policies he inherited from his center-left
predecessor.
"Much of the billions of dollars earmarked for implementation of the protocol in
Canada will be squandered without a proper assessment of recent developments in
climate science," they wrote in the Canadian Financial Post last week.
There is no consensus among climate scientists on the relative importance of the
various causes of global climate change, they wrote. Study of global climate
change is an "emerging science."
"'Climate change is real' is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to
convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause.
Neither of these fears is justified.
"Global climate changes all the time due to natural causes and the human impact
still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural 'noise'."
The list of brave signatories (below) looks like a list of �Who�s Who� of the
world�s scientists.
Dr. Ian D. Clark, professor, isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology,
Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa
Dr. Tad Murty, former senior research scientist, Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans,
former director of Australia's National Tidal Facility and professor of earth
sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide; currently adjunct professor,
Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa
Dr. R. Timothy Patterson, professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences (paleoclimatology),
Carleton University , Ottawa
Dr. Fred Michel, director, Institute of Environmental Science and associate
professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Carleton University , Ottawa
Dr. Madhav Khandekar, former research scientist, Environment Canada.
Member of editorial board of Climate Research and Natural Hazards
Dr. Paul Copper, FRSC, professor emeritus, Dept. of Earth Sciences,
Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ont.
Dr. Ross McKitrick, associate professor, Dept. of Economics, University of Guelph , Ont.
Dr. Tim Ball, former professor of climatology, University of Winnipeg ; environmental consultant
Dr. Andreas Prokoph, adjunct professor of earth sciences, University of Ottawa ;
consultant in statistics and geology
Mr. David Nowell, M.Sc. (Meteorology), fellow of the Royal Meteorological
Society, Canadian member and past chairman of the NATO Meteorological
Group, Ottawa
Dr. Christopher Essex, professor of applied mathematics and associate director of
the Program in Theoretical Physics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
Dr. Gordon E. Swaters, professor of applied mathematics, Dept. of Mathematical
Sciences, and member, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Research Group, University
of Alberta
Dr. L. Graham Smith, associate professor, Dept. of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
Dr. G. Cornelis van Kooten, professor and Canada Research Chair in
environmental studies and climate change, Dept. of Economics, University
of Victoria
Dr. Petr Chylek, adjunct professor, Dept. of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University , Halifax
Dr./Cdr. M. R. Morgan, FRMS, climate consultant, former meteorology advisor
to the World Meteorological Organization. Previously research scientist in
climatology at University of Exeter , U.K.
Dr. Keith D. Hage, climate consultant and professor emeritus of Meteorology, University of Alberta
Dr. David E. Wojick, P.Eng., energy consultant, Star Tannery, Va. , and Sioux
Lookout, Ont.
Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, principal consultant,
Pacific Phytometric Consultants, Surrey , B.C.
Dr. Douglas Leahey, meteorologist and air-quality consultant, Calgary
Paavo Siitam, M.Sc., agronomist, chemist, Cobourg, Ont.
Dr. Chris de Freitas, climate scientist, associate professor, The University of Auckland, N.Z.
Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology, Dept. of Earth,
Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Dr. Freeman J. Dyson, emeritus professor of physics, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton , N.J.
Mr. George Taylor, Dept. of Meteorology , Oregon State University; Oregon
State climatologist; past president, American Association of State Climatologists
Dr. Ian Plimer, professor of geology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences,
University of Adelaide; emeritus professor of earth sciences, University of
Melbourne, Australia
Dr. R.M. Carter, professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University , Townsville , Australia
Mr. William Kininmonth, Australasian Climate Research, former Head National
Climate Centre, Australian Bureau of Meteorology; former Australian delegate to
World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology, Scientific and
Technical Review
Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, former director of research, Royal Netherlands
Meteorological Institute Dr. Gerrit J. van der Lingen, geologist/paleoclimatologist,
Climate Change Consultant, Geoscience Research and Investigations, New
Zealand
Dr. Patrick J. Michaels, professor of environmental sciences, University of Virginia
Dr. Nils-Axel Morner, emeritus professor of paleogeophysics & geodynamics, Stockholm University , Stockholm , Sweden
Dr. Gary D. Sharp, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas , Calif.
Dr. Roy W. Spencer, principal research scientist, Earth System Science Center ,
The University of Alabama, Huntsville
Dr. Al Pekarek, associate professor of geology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Dept., St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minn.
Dr. Marcel Leroux, professor emeritus of climatology, University of Lyon , France ;
former director of Laboratory of Climatology, Risks and Environment, CNRS
Dr. Paul Reiter, professor, Institut Pasteur, Unit of Insects and Infectious Diseases,
Paris , France . Expert reviewer, IPCC Working group II, chapter 8 (human health)
Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, physicist and chairman, Scientific Council of Central
Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw , Poland
Dr. Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, reader, Dept. of Geography, University of Hull ,
U.K. ; editor, Energy & Environment
Dr. Hans H.J. Labohm, former advisor to the executive board, Clingendael
Institute (The Netherlands Institute of International Relations) and an economist
who has focused on climate change
Dr. Lee C. Gerhard, senior scientist emeritus, University of Kansas , past director
and state geologist, Kansas Geological Survey
Dr. Asmunn Moene, past head of the Forecasting Centre, Meteorological Institute, Norway
Dr. August H. Auer, past professor of atmospheric science, University of
Wyoming ; previously chief meteorologist, Meteorological Service (MetService)
of New Zealand
Dr. Vincent Gray, expert reviewer for the IPCC and author of The Greenhouse
Delusion: A Critique of 'Climate Change 2001,' Wellington , N.Z.
Dr. Howard Hayden, emeritus professor of physics, University of Connecticut
Dr Benny Peiser, professor of social anthropology, Faculty of Science,
Liverpool John Moores University , U.K.
Dr. Jack Barrett, chemist and spectroscopist, formerly with Imperial College
London, U.K.
Dr. William J.R. Alexander, professor emeritus, Dept. of Civil and Biosystems
Engineering, University of Pretoria , South Africa . Member, United Nations
Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, 1994-2000
Dr. S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences, University of
Virginia ; former director, U.S. Weather Satellite Service
Dr. Harry N.A. Priem, emeritus professor of planetary geology and isotope
geophysics, Utrecht University; former director of the Netherlands Institute for
Isotope Geosciences; past president of the Royal Netherlands Geological &
Mining Society
Dr. Robert H. Essenhigh, E.G. Bailey professor of energy conversion, Dept.
of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University
Dr. Sallie Baliunas, astrophysicist and climate researcher, Boston , Mass.
Douglas Hoyt, senior scientist at Raytheon (retired) and co-author of the book
The Role of the Sun in Climate Change; previously with NCAR, NOAA,
and the World Radiation Center, Davos, Switzerland
Dipl.-Ing. Peter Dietze, independent energy advisor and scientific climate and
carbon modeller, official IPCC reviewer, Bavaria , Germany
Dr. Boris Winterhalter, senior marine researcher (retired), Geological Survey
of Finland, former professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki , Finland
Dr. Wibjorn Karlen, emeritus professor, Dept. of Physical Geography and
Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University , Sweden
Dr. Hugh W. Ellsaesser, physicist/meteorologist, previously with the Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory, Calif. ; atmospheric consultant.
Dr. Art Robinson, founder, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, Cave Junction, Ore.
Dr. Arthur Rorsch, emeritus professor of molecular genetics, Leiden University,
The Netherlands; past board member, Netherlands organization for applied
research (TNO) in environmental, food and public health
Dr. Alister McFarquhar, Downing College , Cambridge , U.K. ; international
economist
Dr. Richard S. Courtney, climate and atmospheric science consultant, IPCC expert reviewer, U.K. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, big battle in Canada now over the direction of Canada's environmental policy right now. As you have pointed out, there many scientists who decry the bad science in Kyoto (scientists don't like politics, but politics are inevitable if you hope to acheive a multi-national agreement).
On the other hand, there is distrubing news about Canada's complete inability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as per its Kyoto accord obligations:
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/05/10/canada.kyoto.reut/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sundubuman, you didn't post a link to the article. I googled it but was unable to come up with it.
Interestingly enough, here's the article I was able to find:
Quote: |
Act now on climate change, scientists tell Canada
Staff and agencies
19 April, 2006
By David Ljunggren 40 minutes ago
OTTAWA - Unless Canada�s new government moves quickly to tackle global warming the country�s economy and quality of life will increasingly suffer in decades to come, 90 top environmental experts told Prime Minister Stephen Harper in an open letter.
Harper, whose Conservatives won the January 23 election, is openly unenthusiastic about the Kyoto accord on climate change and says there is no way Canada can meet its targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions.
"We urge you and your government to develop an effective national strategy to deal with the many important aspects of climate that will affect both Canada and the rest of the world in the near future," said the letter, which was delivered to Harper�s office late on Tuesday.
"There will be increasing impacts of climate change on Canada�s natural ecosystems and on our socioeconomic activities," it added, saying side effects could include more extreme events such as floods and droughts.
Under Kyoto, Canada is committed to cutting its emissions by 6 percent below 1990 levels by 2008-12. The latest data show emissions are running 24.4 percent above 1990 levels and these are set to soar as Canada continues to develop the oil-rich tar sands in the western province of Alberta.
Harper is from Alberta, which is also a Conservative power base. The government says it wants a made-in-Canada approach to tackling climate change and last week scrapped 15 research programs related to the Kyoto protocol .
A spokesman for Harper said the prime minister would respond to the letter in due course.
Gordon McBean, the University of Western Ontario scientist who organized the letter, said Harper has to tackle climate change quickly.
"We need an adaptation strategy and we need a long-term strategy to address the emissions of greenhouse gases," he told Reuters by phone on Wednesday.
"In the last five years we have seen more scientific information come out that leads me to be more concerned than I ever was before," said McBean, who chairs the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences.
The scientists said Canada had warmed faster than almost any other region on the globe in the last 50 years, particularly in the Arctic, which could be ice free in summer before the end of the century.
The letter was in part designed as a response to an open letter from 60 climate change skeptics, who wrote to Harper in early April to say "global climate changes all the time due to natural causes."
McBean and his colleagues said other possible results of climate change in Canada would be inadequate supplies of water for western and central grain-growing regions as well as for hydroelectric power stations. |
http://www.heraldnewsdaily.com/stories/news-00178137.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
cute......
your need to reference the past.
intellecual straitjackets need not be permanent....btw....... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pull your head out of your arse for once- If you weren't so lazy I wouldn't have had to bring the point up. Unlike you I'm not wedded to one side of the argument- I want to find out wtf is going on with climate change. If climatologists can't agree then I sure as hell don't know who is right, nor do politicians. It's not my fault I went looking for your article and found a rebuttal to it, but there it is, nonetheless.
And your quip about the past... well, are you that stupid, or what?
Both sides of the issue constantly refer to the past, and past data! I realize you're just trying to be snide about my insistance on sources, but talk about a case of foot in mouth! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whose head needs to be pulled out of one's ass?
The media has been endorsing global warming as not just a cause du jour, but A cause of our lives......
clear thinking on the issue requires total distance from mass media........ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
WTF? Are you on drugs? We're talking about articles on 2 groups of opposing climatology scientists, and now you want to go off on a rant about the media?!? Because I asked for your source? And because, well, the media reported that a group of scientists have put forward a rebuttal letter?!?
Time to put you in the loony file alongwith IGTG and ddeubel. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
if you were creative in your thinking, you might have tried typing in the 3-letter phrase....Kyoto is Pointless....
which would have resulted in the following
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=%22kyoto+is+pointless%22&sa=N&tab=nw
Kyoto is pointless, say 60 leading scientists
By Philip Sherwell
(Filed: 09/04/2006)
Canada's new Conservative prime minister, Stephen Harper, has been urged by more than 60 leading international climate change experts to review the global warming policies he inherited from his centre-Left predecessor.
In an open letter that includes five British scientists among the signatories, the experts praise his recent commitment to review the controversial Kyoto protocol on reducing emissions harmful to the environment.
Stephen Harper
Stephen Harper has been urged to review his policies
"Much of the billions of dollars earmarked for implementation of the protocol in Canada will be squandered without a proper assessment of recent developments in climate science," they wrote in the Canadian Financial Post last week.
They emphasised that the study of global climate change is, in Mr Harper's own words, an "emerging science" and added: "If, back in the mid 1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary." Despite claims to the contrary, there is no consensus among climate scientists on the relative importance of the various causes of global climate change, they wrote.
"'Climate change is real' is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause. Neither of these fears is justified.
"Global climate changes all the time due to natural causes and the human impact still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural 'noise'."
The letter is the latest effort by climate change sceptics to counter claims that there is a consensus that human activity is causing global warming.
Print this page as text onlyPrint
Email this storyEmail this story |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
and......
your response to leading scientists.........
claiming the whole thing is a bunch of baloney..................
is?????????????????????????? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sundubuman
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
global warming is just soooo real and happening and we all just have to do exactly what ???? to mitigate the effects of our selfish actions...???,,,???
I'm sure you have a long list of suggestions/COMMANDS that should be implemented to reduce this whole global warming threat.
Maybe you should appoint yourself our beneficient overlord.......
and save us all from the non-existent calamity you are so worked up over............ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Debate on global warming is silly. We should move away from fossil fuels as quick as possible because 1) it hurts our health and stinks, and 2) it frees us from dependence on countries that we may or may not be able to rely on.
And, if global warming is true, well that's reason #3. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sundubuman wrote: |
if you were creative in your thinking, you might have tried typing in the 3-letter phrase....Kyoto is Pointless....
|
I entered the entire title- as you entered it in your op- into Google news and it did not come up with this. I also tried the entire first sentence and still did not find it.
Stop being lazy and post a link or at least mention the source next time so we can avoid this in the future. It's not too much to expect, nor too much to ask. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sundubuman wrote: |
and......
your response to leading scientists.........
claiming the whole thing is a bunch of baloney..................
is?????????????????????????? |
Time to grab a clue and realize I've already answered this- I don't know and am looking for all info, for and against.
Meanwhile you seem to be stuck on numbers "60 Scientists! 60 Scientists!" without noticing the rebuttal article I found... should I be yelling "90 scientists!!! 90 Scientists!! Ha! Take that, Sundubuman!!!"?
No.
But [what] I would like to know is [why] are 150 experts on the subject so bitterly divided?
I think that's a question worth asking, and trying to find the answer to.
Meanwhile, you can continue to dig up articles which reflect only one side of the debate- that's okay, because Rapier does exactly the same thing on the other side.
I'll continue to read both sides of the argument.
Last edited by Bulsajo on Sat May 13, 2006 12:44 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sundubuman wrote: |
global warming is just soooo real and happening and we all just have to do exactly what ???? to mitigate the effects of our selfish actions...???,,,???
I'm sure you have a long list of suggestions/COMMANDS that should be implemented to reduce this whole global warming threat.
Maybe you should appoint yourself our beneficient overlord.......
and save us all from the non-existent calamity you are so worked up over............ |
How ridiculous, Sundubuman.
You cannot seem to separate two different questions:
1. Is humanity causing a global warming?
That's the big one, and seems to be the crux of dessention between our two groups of scientists. I understand you are firmly on the 'no' side.
But there is a second question
2. Is global warming occuring?
See, this is where I don't understand people like you- regardless of whether you answer 'yes' or 'no' to question 1, there are still the effects of global warming to deal with- weather patterns are changing, seas are rising, people and animals and vegetation WILL be affected.
But the people who say 'no' to number 1 also seem to say "we need do nothing and spend no money nor make no preparations with regard to global warming".
This seems to me to be ignorance, or insanity.
I understand that if you do not think humanity is causing global warming then you probably want to pass on Kyoto, and you'll probably want to continue to live in a fossil fuel economy (even though that brings so many other problems with which have nothing to do with greenhouse gas emissions, but I'll leave that out for now).
But why are you so intent on shutting down research and funding on global warming?
We still have a long way to go towards understanding the earth and what sorts of changes are in the future.
So yeah, I think you've got your head pretty deep up your arse. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[deleted]
Last edited by Gopher on Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|