Korean Job Discussion Forums

[some waygug-in]

http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/003394.html


The NY Times, Judy Miller and 9/11: The most stunning failure yet?


Because just now, some 56 months after the fact, we are learning that both Judy Miller and her editors at the New York Times had information that foretold the 9/11 terror attacks and elected not to publish it. Reading the new story carefully, it does seem that a decision to publish the article in the summer of 2001 was not a "slam dunk,' that there were legitimate questions whether Miller's tip was enough to hang a story on. But the episode does raise a couple of other serious questions -- surely about the pre-attack ineptitude of the Bush White House, but also over the Times' handling of this explosive info both before and after 9/11.



Actually, I'm not surprised by this. As the Bush regime sinks, I think we will see more and more stories like this coming out of the woodwork.

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

The US has lots of info and lots of intel on this and that.

However it is very difficult to organize it and it is very difficult to select what is good quality and what is of poor quaility .

To make matters worse US intel agencies don't work together.