Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Adult classes - Never talk about religion!!!!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
diablo3



Joined: 11 Sep 2004

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, religion is not really a problem to talk about. I think the sensitive issue is "Da Vinci Code" which hit a few nerves with some religious groups in Korea.

Anyway, religion is not interesting to talk about, that might be the other problem. Politics is so boring for the Koreans also.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the title says it all.

It is kind of a traditional maxim to avoid politics and religion in 'polite' society. I think that was developed for a good reason. These are essentially private belief systems with very strong emotional attachments.

The 'rules' have broken down lately, which is too bad. They are very important topics, but are best discussed with friends in a more private setting.

Since we are in a language teaching situation, there are ways to teach the vocabulary for these situations without actually discussing people's beliefs.


Last edited by Ya-ta Boy on Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FUBAR



Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Location: The Y.C.

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:31 am    Post subject: Re: Adult classes - Never talk about religion!!!! Reply with quote

Aussiekimchi wrote:


Today I got to class finding that 4 students (3 adjumas and 1 older bloke) had left and asked the director for a refund.
Obviously I got the "please explain?"
I won't bring up religion in a discussion class again.
What are some other tabu subjects in Korean discussion classes?


Are you new to Korea? if so... u can get a free pass.. Otherwise, that's your own fault. Prior to the Davinci Code coming out, it was all over the newspapers that the Christian groups were trying to get Davinci banned from theaters. Seeing that there its about 45% Christian in this country, you should assume that at least some of the students would hate this topic and blame you for it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dreaming_saturn



Joined: 26 May 2004

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:


It is kind of a traditional maxim to avoid politics and religion in 'polite' society. I think that was developed for a good reason. These are essentially private belief systems with very strong emotional attachments.


Don't forget Ya-ta that these are very culture bound, but I still think it's a good general rule to avoid them. Sounds like religion is also a bad topic for Korea. it would be nice to have a good general list of what NOT to discuss and what students particularly enjoy discussing. I had one given to me before I statred in China (number 1 was Taiwan, ha ha) and we were given instuctions not to bring up politics if it could be avoided.

For example, the Dutch are quite happy to talk about politics in all areas - I worked for preping EU hopefuls who had to do a test to be admitted, and NGO workers and they specifically asked to learn vocabulary for and debate political issues such as racial discrimination. But I think that falls under a specialist course.

Shoild we develop a list? In China I found that anything that was slightly controversial and really got high school students talking in Canada was boring or not interesting (anything political) but they could debate love vs. money ad naseum and be completely happy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
The Lemon



Joined: 11 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Topics that always got me in trouble with Korean adult classes:

1. fan death
2. those two girls and the tank thing
3. North Korea
4. IMF
5. why Korean-made products cost 300 percent more in Korea than in stores on the other side of the world
6. why there are almost no foreign cars on Korean roads (but plenty of Korean cars on North American roads.. fair trade?)
7. *anything* that might be taken to be negative about Korea (see 1-6, above)
8. Sex
9. World events that don't directly involve Korea (in general, a total, mindnumbing lack of curiosity or knowledge about the outside world)
10. Interracial relations
11. Japan

I enjoyed adult classes, but found them to be highly weird in ways kids aren't. Some classes would latch on to me and keep requesting me semester after semester - and I'm not boasting about this, because I really do run out of tricks after 4-6 months with the same people and would have rathered they moved on to someone else.

But other classes would start off with 10 students and through the semester would drop down to 3 (they got bored? I offended them? fickle? who knows.. I stopped caring and learned to not let that bother me)

I also had a real problem with the mentality that the students should only discuss "safe" topics, which quickly run out as the months pass.

To the OP: consider pair discussion, at least to start the class. Get the students to discuss the topic in pairs and have them report on their conversations later to the whole group. Among the benefits this offers is an increase in time they each spend speaking in class, as opposed to the usual way, where everyone waits their turn to talk one at a time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aussiekimchi



Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Location: SYDNEY

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[i]1. fan death
2. those two girls and the tank thing
3. North Korea
4. IMF
5. why Korean-made products cost 300 percent more in Korea than in stores on the other side of the world
6. why there are almost no foreign cars on Korean roads (but plenty of Korean cars on North American roads.. fair trade?)
7. *anything* that might be taken to be negative about Korea (see 1-6, above)
8. Sex
9. World events that don't directly involve Korea (in general, a total, mindnumbing lack of curiosity or knowledge about the outside world)
10. Interracial relations
11. Japan [/i]

Ok that's just scary.
I have had problems with all of these apart from IMF and interracial relationships.
Fan death is an interesting one.
I always thought that the danger was electricution or the fan falling on you or something, but no. The danger that spooked all of the koreans was hypothermia! In the middle of those hot July/August nights, Koreans are petrified of leaving their little 30 watt fan on because they might freeze to death! Unbelievable.
So I quickly found out that some people do not like discussing how they were all made out to be idiots because they threw away their fans and bought an air conditioner at 100 times the cost!
I was teaching adults here when the tank thing happened. We couldn't get through much other than the Koreans wanted the Americans to say sorry. It was a real dicey subject.

North Korea....well like us, South Koreans really just do not know much about the place. Some students may parrot something they heard on the news which sounded ok to them, " We must have reunification!" but really do not know why they are saying it.

The IMF subject I have found to be ok as I simply ask what happened to the average joe in the street at that time. e.g. selling jewelery etc. they can talk about this but always end up chanting that it is all USA's fault.

Sex, well you have to have some level of maturity to discuss this, so this was quickly forgotten.

World events, well I am Australian so I have no idea either. We are as isolated and as nonchalant as the Koreans. I would not know where to start...and if any American can talk about a world event that does not involve America I would be all ears!

Interracial relationships, most students are curious about my love life and would throw gasoline on themselves if their own daughter brought home an Aussie...but at least we can talk about it.

Japan, well they know they hate them, but do not like talking about why.

For 5 years I have simply tried to get away from the topics of:
1. Children's education
2. Mother inlaws
3. husbands/wives

These can get a little boring day in day out.
But you know, all of the above topics are potentially interesting, but if I was a student, I might think they are a little heavy to be discussing at 7am each morning. Maybe I should plan lessons on cereal or sleep deprivation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
The Lemon



Joined: 11 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The IMF subject I have found to be ok as I simply ask what happened to the average joe in the street at that time. e.g. selling jewelery etc. they can talk about this but always end up chanting that it is all USA's fault.

Ok. Let me rant. This is what I restrained myself from saying in class, so here's my big chance.

The first thing about the "IMF crisis" that's all wrong is the name.

A brief, obscenely simplified review of 1997: The modern Korean economy was built on a corrupt and shadowy tangle of relations between the government, the banking system, and the chaebol. Their system of never-ending credit, guaranteed by each other, worked super until a couple collapsed because of the crash in SE Asia, and the collapse of Hanbo Steel. The mutual-guarantee system then collapsed like a house of cards. The IMF loaned Korea billions of dollars on the condition that they restructure the country's banking and industry, as well as open up Korea's markets to the outside world. Which Korea did - to their long-term gain - but it was painful for them.

So.. what do Koreans call it? The "Chaebol Crisis"? The "Corrupt Adjoshis" crisis? No, the "IMF Crisis"- that's the IMF that bailed the country out. That's like driving your car into a wall and then forever referring to your accident as the "Ambulance Crisis".

Also, your students aren't telling you about the very serious anti-foreigner bent that the Korean public went on in late 97-early 98 - spitting at Westerners on the subways, open season of vandalism on those Koreans who dared drive foreign cars.. Koreans were told/wanted to believe that the problems of the country were caused by foreigners, with predictable results. it was an ugly time that rivalled the "candlelight vigil" 2002 period.

But the IMF topic was tiny-time compared to "fan death". That one was radioactive. I tried to be non-judgmental, I tried to hear "the other side". But that meant having to sit through all kinds of crap about "Korean bodies are different" and "a vacuum is created around the nose", and I'm just not good enough of a person to be able to do that.


Last edited by The Lemon on Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aussiekimchi



Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Location: SYDNEY

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah funnily enough, these points are never raised...go figure!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
jacl



Joined: 31 Oct 2005

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also, if you don't want to teach the class, those are great topics to bring up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChopChaeJoe



Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As far as I know, my job is to provide quality English instruction, not raise consciousnesses. If i can provoke thought in an area, well that's a bonus. But I see no reason to involve controversey when there are thousands upon thousands of topics at hand.

I certainly wouldn't make students watch a divivsive and illegally produced movie and then attack each others opinions about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dreaming_saturn



Joined: 26 May 2004

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChopChaeJoe wrote:
As far as I know, my job is to provide quality English instruction, not raise consciousnesses. If i can provoke thought in an area, well that's a bonus. But I see no reason to involve controversey when there are thousands upon thousands of topics at hand.

I certainly wouldn't make students watch a divivsive and illegally produced movie and then attack each others opinions about it.


I think you've got a good point. Our job is to have the students learn something. Though I think the OP had good intentions. For example:

igotthisguitar I'll talk about whatever i want, consequences be damned.

Well, talking about the differences between men and women for the 1000th time might be boring for us teachers, but let's remember that it's a job and we're really not teaching to entertain ourselves. In my current job I've seen a telephoning video at least 22 times, students love it. I have to keep myself from bolting from the room when it gets played. Colleagues can all quote the entire thing, and we did it one night during drinks. Do we enjoy using this resource? No. Does it work? Yes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
jajdude



Joined: 18 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just depends on who the students are. I taught ajumma/mother classes before and no topic was really off limits because they liked each other and got used to me, and would often talk about personal things in English. If a man joined the class it might have been awkward.

I liked that woman class. They were all older than me, and had good English. They were mostly well-educated, or travelled or sophisticated enough to understand various perspectives. I revealed personal things too. It was a good class. It may not have been typical of adult classes in Korea though.

Teaching adults who are beginners at English: now that is a drag.

I think it just depends on who the students are. Some, from college age and older, are quite intelligent and sophisticated, and can talk about just about anything. Sure "Japan" or whatever might raise some emotions, but still there are many adults willing to speak intelligently no matter the subject.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WorldWide



Joined: 28 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe it was the fact you spent 2 days discussing a movie, instead of teaching them. I tend to limit discussion time to no more than 15 minutes because students realize that its not really work on the teachers part. Adults like to be lectured to and see that a teacher is working for them. Not just sitting back and chatting to pass the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Lemon



Joined: 11 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Adults like to be lectured to and see that a teacher is working for them. Not just sitting back and chatting to pass the time.

Welcome to the mystical world of "free conversation classes".

There are structures and activities that the effective teacher sets up (pair work, pyramid/parachute debates). But the classes are not a "stand up and lecture to the class" format. In fact, the success of a teacher is measured by how much talking time the students get in the period, and how little talking the teacher does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aussiekimchi



Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Location: SYDNEY

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adults like to be lectured to and see that a teacher is working for them. Not just sitting back and chatting to pass the time.


Would you not consider the perfect class is where the teacher creates a situation for student interraction and then merely has to correct and lead in certain directions?
The teacher should be aiming to speak as little as possible. The first mistake many teachers here make is this. They do not know when to be quiet and listen to what the students have to say.
In fact in a class discussion where all students are active, the teacher should be working harder to ensure the objective is met.
The idea of discussion is to hopefully have the students thinking in English rather than just regurgitating grammar sentences.
If the teacher simply stands there and lectures, how are the oral skills of the students improving?
You are simply helping their listening skills and maybe simply making parrots of your students.
Actually for a week prior to these two lessons, we were practicing skills that would aid their discussion techniques.
In my opinion
What do you think about
Have you considered
I heard that
I have read
We also went through a lot of vocabulary and wrote predictions or critiques.
There are different teachers in the school and I am the only foreigner. The other classes are straight out grammar classes using reading and writing. The students come to my class for discussion and to learn about western culture if only through the mind and eyes of a simple Aussie.

Again I stand by my decision to use the class style because I knew it would create emotion. By doing this, I hoped that the students would want to speak and would want to put forth their opinions when challenged because this is real life situation. They are passed "What is your hobby?" "I am fine thankyou and you?"

I was hoping for an adult conversation and got it. It seems though I just misjudged the maturity level of some of my students or the passion they had for their own beliefs, or maybe the fear they have of their own beliefs.
Because let's face it, how many classes have you participated in as a student or teacher where someone else had a different opinion to yours?
If you discussed various viewpoints, did you or the other quit?
Probably not.
So in hindsight, I admit that I made a mistake with the content, (religion just is too dangerous) but I stand by the style of class, the result of the class and the interraction it created.
I just wish I could get the same result using the topic of what you like to do in your free time.
Oh yeah and by the way, the students are coming back to class but my boss simply wants me to teach the grammar in the text book from now on. No more controversial classes. He has promised the students that.
He told me that if I want to have a discussion class, please use topics that the students "want to talk about". His words.
Sometimes ya just gotta tow the line.
Ok the rant is over. I'll just step down off this box now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International