Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Transcript - 3 month limit
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
seoul101



Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:27 am    Post subject: Transcript - 3 month limit Reply with quote

Hello,

I've recently become aware that transcripts cannot be more than 3 months old when applying for a new visa (can they make things any more difficult?!).
I just checked one of the open transcripts I have and, unsurprisingly, it is not dated when it was printed off by my University. Only with the date I received my degree.

Is this a problem? Does anyone have experience with this, or would care to comment?

Many thanks for any help!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alabamaman



Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:33 am    Post subject: YO Reply with quote

Immigration propaganda comming down the pipes again Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seoul101



Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

alabamaman, just telling it how it is! Or at least how I've been told...

What's the score on this one?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr Crowley



Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Location: Suwon

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Someone is giving you wrong info. I got my visa 3 weeks ago with transcripts that my university sent me last year. Although, immigration is known to change their mind, or "policy" on things from one day to the next.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alabamaman



Joined: 25 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've used transcripts that were over three months old. The seal was still in tact. You are hearing a grotesque rumor from some individual who hasn't been to the concerned Korean Immigration Office himself/herself. You can always walk down to your closest Immigration Office and ask the exact same question youre asking us. They probably won't have a clue. They don't have a clue as to what a Letter of Release is sometimes. What matters is that it's the real McCoy, and that the seal isn't broken.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seoul101



Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks guys, those are positive responses.

It's funny, why would a recruiter give this info? Are you sure it's not something that's came out in the last few days?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
prairieboy



Joined: 14 Sep 2003
Location: The batcave.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, 2 weeks ago, this happened to a teacher at my company. Immgration rejected the transcripts because they were more than 3 months old.

We were informed that this is the policy now. Transcripts must be no more than 3 months old.

The teacher had to order new transcripts to submit.

It might be someone at immigration doesn't know what the policy and is handing one of us a line.

That's the nature of immigration. New policy today, abandoned tomorrow only to be picked up again the day after, etc. etc. etc.

I said it before...it's retarded.

It's sealed, stamped, mailed direct from the university...how could it not be a proper, true, original and legitimate transcript? Immigration... Rolling Eyes and the E-2 visa... Rolling Eyes Thank god I don't have to deal with that anymore, the F2-1 is much better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
own_king



Joined: 17 Apr 2004
Location: here

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your transcript will be fine as long as the information on it is current. That rule only applies, if you have taken courses in the last three months. It just means that the information on it can't be outdated. Most of us finished school more than three months ago, so don't worry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuckistan
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Location: Training future GS competitors.....

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

prairieboy wrote:
Actually, 2 weeks ago, this happened to a teacher at my company. Immgration rejected the transcripts because they were more than 3 months old.

We were informed that this is the policy now. Transcripts must be no more than 3 months old.

The teacher had to order new transcripts to submit.

It might be someone at immigration doesn't know what the policy and is handing one of us a line.

That's the nature of immigration. New policy today, abandoned tomorrow only to be picked up again the day after, etc. etc. etc.

I said it before...it's retarded.

It's sealed, stamped, mailed direct from the university...how could it not be a proper, true, original and legitimate transcript? Immigration... Rolling Eyes and the E-2 visa... Rolling Eyes Thank god I don't have to deal with that anymore, the F2-1 is much better.


If Immigration is going to change the rules at will (which is their prerogative), why don't they have an English/Korean webpage specifically for English teachers/schools with regular updates of these Immigration rule changes instead of people having to find out the (disappointing) surprise way. It jams up the schools too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dimnd



Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Western USA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:41 pm    Post subject: transcripts Reply with quote

My transcripts are two years old and the ones used for my job last year were a year old. They were degree transcripts that corroborated my diploma. Maybe that is also a difference. Also, no other courses were taken as the sealed transcripts which I turned in were ..as I said...degree transcripts. I have 2 more dated 2004 but think they are fine also along with 3 more diplomas I ordered.

Any comments?
Peg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EdInstead



Joined: 20 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This time limit thing is nothing more than an attempt to control the teacher as much as possible. They do not want teachers to be able to leave contracts easily, or quickly. They are doing as much as possible in order to deter this. They don't want you to have sealed legal copies of your transcripts sitting around, ready for immediate use. Thus the 3 month rule. As far as "dated" is concerned, they're often looking for a mailing date, as I've heard.

Those of you who live here long enough (and are actually teaching here) will learn that Korea is all about control and hierarchy. Korean employees are also treated like servants, and cannot easily go from job-to-job. It's their way. If a Korean leaves a job quickly, that record follows them for the rest of their lives.

Bosses have always counted on that fact, and can easily mistreat their workers for at least a year (which is often the minimum Korean employees will put up with hell). It truly is an owner-slave mentality. Rarely will a Korean leave a job in under a year, or even two. They will endure it, just so they don't have it on their record that they left early. Bosses play this for all it's worth. Bosses even want control over that employee after they have left (release letters, recommendations, etc.). It's all about power-tripping and confucist ego.

Foriegners are different. We don't care, can get another teaching job the same day, and will quickly go elsewhere if mistreated. This disrupts the whole system, and quite frankly, is not something Koreans are mentally prepared to deal with. The realization that they don't have control over the employee is just too much for their pride to handle.

It's the same with immigration. And quite frankly, if they allowed you to come and go from jobs as you pleased, they would have to increase their staff ten-fold due to all of the sucky employers here, and people leaving.

So what is the result of all of this? We now have an estimated 20,000+ waygooks here working illegally on tourist visas. Koreans have no control over them, unless caught. Lost tax revenue, etc... all because of a big ego trip.

Way to go immigration. Perfect illustration of the flawed confucist mentality still at large.

The funny thing that you know drives them absolutely insane is the fact that they can do nothing about the illegals, unless the illegals are caught. If they do, then they know the Koreans who are richer and more powerful than they will shit razors, because their families will encounter visa difficulties in Canada, etc., when they begin clamping down on Koreans living/working over there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lastat06513



Joined: 18 Mar 2003
Location: Sensus amo Caesar , etiamnunc victus amo uni plebian

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's why when I return to Korea, I will not apply for a visa and instead work part-time.

Yep, you've heard it from me, lastat, the TRUE devil's advocate has gone renegade.

And screw all of you who say it is illegal!!!
I am an ESL vet, I've earned the right to do privates!!!!!
And I will bet I will thrive on it, you'll see Wink

Guys and Gals..........see all of you next year~!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seoul101



Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems this 3 month thing is turning out to be true - lets hope it gets trashed sooner rather than later. This sort of thing is what makes me look to another country, so Korea will just lose out on qualified, legal teachers and make do with illegal ones.

So the postage stamp is what they go by - mine is just in a plain envelope with the University stamp. Would it work just to send it home in an envelope then get someone to post the transcript envelope with a postage stamp on it (thus leaving a recent date on there)?
Hopefull that's not too confusing.

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seoul101



Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lastat, I don't blame you. If I were you, I'd call myself an 'English Mercenary'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lastat06513



Joined: 18 Mar 2003
Location: Sensus amo Caesar , etiamnunc victus amo uni plebian

PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If I were you, I'd call myself an 'English Mercenary'.


In the end, that is all it boils down to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International